- More philosophy about being rigorous in mathematics.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about logic in philosophy and mathematics.. - 1 Update
- More about DNS-based DDoS attacks and more.. - 1 Update
- How to protect organizations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures and web server.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about the human free will and more.. - 1 Update
- A Famous Argument Against Free Will Has Been Debunked - 1 Update
- There's no Such thing as Free Will - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 03 05:52PM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about being rigorous in mathematics.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I am thinking about mathematics but i think that the books of mathematics are "lacking", since i think that they have to know how to abstract and how to be rigorous so that to be efficient, so i have looked at how many books are teaching mathematics, but i think that they are lacking, since i think you have also to understand the essence of things in mathematics like we are doing it in philosophy of mathematics and you have to have an efficient abstract global view of mathematics. More philosophy about logic in philosophy and mathematics.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i will continu to invent ideas from my brain, so I think logic in mathematics is really interesting and there is something happening in logic in mathematics that looks like the real numbers in mathematics, since i think that from the general truth table of all the cases of the logical implication we are getting a general law or general formula that is: (p implies q) is equivalent to ((not p) or q) And p and q are logical variables. And here is the truth table of the logical implication: p q p -> q 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 So i think by logically inferring the general rule of: (p implies q) is equivalent to ((not p) or q), is like making the general "concept" that applies to all the "particular" cases, so it also applies to causality since this general rule is like a general concept that permits to "model" all the cases in the truth table of the logical implication, so i think this way of doing by generalizing and making like a general concept is really powerful, this is why i think that real numbers in mathematics are like a concept that was made to model all the cases of the reality(read my below thoughts about it), so now we are understanding more that logic in mathematics permits to verify the logical consistency, so it is good for "reliability", and it also permits to optimize since for example one logical proof can be more "practical" or "faster" than another logical proof. More of my philosophy about the human free will and more.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so if we ask the following philosophical question: Is there any free will ? I think humans have no free will, since they have the strong tendency with there smartness to act by being more and more perfection since they have to adapt and to survive and they want to be great perfection so that to solve most of humans problems and it is the goal of morality to be this "perfection" at best, so i think that since humans have this strong tendency so i think it is like there is no free will. Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo More philosophy about the real numbers in mathematics.. I will ask the following philosophical question: Can we know more about real numbers in mathematics? Notice that real numbers in mathematics is like a general "concept" that permits to generally represent quantities or such, so you are then noticing that this general concept has an independent life from the reality, since notice that we can find some parts of the real numbers in mathematics that are not real in reality but they are general and they ensure that real numbers in mathematics work in all the cases in reality, but notice that the real numbers in mathematics are also inferred from reality, it is like a concept that is also inferred from the reality, so when we say "1", i think that the "1" in real numbers is inferred from the reality, but we can find other real numbers that are not real and that generalize. It is like the concept of a "cat" or "dog", if we look carefully at those concepts you will notice that they are both the reality and not the reality, since a concept of a dog is an abstraction that is not the reality, but it is also a generalization that is the reality, so we are abstracting the concept so that to generalize. More philosophy about relativity of time and relativity.. I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that there Einstein special relativity that determines that time is relative, but i say that the zero in the axis of real numbers in mathematics that represents a meaning is also "relative", i mean we can say that we have zero "of" a thing, so you are then noticing that the axis of real numbers is like a general "concept", i mean it is like a general concept that permits to represent like a quantity or such, but since as i made you understand (read my thoughts below) that the law of causation doesn't apply to some things such as the wide space of the universe, so we can not say there is "zero" thing, since for example things such as the wide space of our universe or multiverse have always existed, read my thoughts below of philosophy so that to understand it. More philosophy about time and space and matter and our universe.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart and now i will ask a philosophical question of: From where come time and space and matter of our universe and why our universe is fine-tuned for consciousness? First you can read the following about science: "The laws of thermodynamics say they always existed. Matter is created by energy. All matter consists of energy. This energy is electromagnetic. Light is electromagnetic energy when it decays it creates a background radiation to the universe. Energy cannot be created from nothing or destroyed to nothing, it mutates into another form. Without time there would be infinite space and without space there would be infinite time. Spacetime is a fabric with dimensions and is part of the physical universe. Space and time are inseparable. Everything that exists inside of it is part of it. Time has always existed with space the proportions are all that have changed. Science is trying to explain when the proportions changed." And read the following that says that there is a Multiverse from where has formed our fine-tuned universe: Our Improbable Existence Is No Evidence for a Multiverse https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LGP8A8s6N9c So i think that there is something really important to notice, since i think that for example the wide "space" of our universe or the multiverse has always existed, so we can then say that there is no cause that has created the wide "space" of our universe or multiverse, so then we can then say that we can not give a meaning by the law of causation in such case, since the law of "causation" doesn't apply to some things such as the wide space of the universe, so then we can logically infer that there is some things such as God or the wide space of the universe that have no cause that has created them, so then we can logically infer that we humans have the tendency to think things by using the law of causation, but i think it is a big logical mistake, because there is things such as the wide space of the universe that have no cause. And here is the logical proof that God exist: Read the following of outer body experiences and you will notice that the soul from God exists: More proof of the existence of God.. You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read especially the outer body experience of the 57-year old man below, it is the proof that the soul from God exists): "A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops beating. The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who have all suffered a cardiac arrest. The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after being pronounced clinically dead. One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy while he was technically dead." Read more here: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven And read the following: Does God exists ? You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read especially about the following study where two per cent exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body ) Read more here: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html Yet more philosophy about the essence of God.. As you have just noticed, i have just explained that the nature of God is that he is greatly arrogant(read my thoughts below), so he likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such, so in my new monotheistic religion we have to "glorify" God and it means to give glory to Him, so look in the following muslim video how muslim white people are glorifying God: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3xjz4nxzGQ&list=RDBXBdyJitlRk&index=10 More philosophy about the nature of God.. I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is: "Who is an arrogant person? Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the one who acts as if they're superior, more worthy, and more important than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down. At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They want to be appreciated for the great things they've done and for their special qualities and abilities." And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and fear him and ask him for help. More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that God has let prophet Muhammad writes and talks as a human in many of the parts of the Qur'an with his human defects, and God has also let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God with his human defects, I mean God had programmed prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talks and writes in the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there human defects, so God is the greatest, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that look like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also come from the curse from God, and the facts also prove that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali.. https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context": More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man.. So look at the following video of Jesus Christ: Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will explain my new monotheistic religion: You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus Christ was living over this earth. Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi: Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it (it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 03 05:12PM -0700 Hello... More philosophy about logic in philosophy and mathematics.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i will continu to invent ideas from my brain, so I think logic in mathematics is really interesting and there is something happening in logic in mathematics that looks like the real numbers in mathematics, since i think that from the general truth table of all the cases of the logical implication we are getting a general law or general formula that is: (p implies q) is equivalent to ((not p) or q) And p and q are logical variables. And here is the truth table of the logical implication: p q p -> q 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 So i think by logically inferring the general rule of ((not p) or q) is like making the general "concept" that applies to all the "particular" cases, so it also applies to causality since this general rule is like a general concept that permits to "model" all the cases in the truth table of the logical implication, so i think this way of doing by generalizing and making like a general concept is really powerful, this is why i think that real numbers in mathematics are like a concept that was made to model all the cases of the reality(read my below thoughts about it), so now we are understanding more that logic in mathematics permits to verify the logical consistency, so it is good for "reliability", and it also permits to optimize since for example one logical proof can be more "practical" or "faster" than another logical proof. More of my philosophy about the human free will and more.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so if we ask the following philosophical question: Is there any free will ? I think humans have no free will, since they have the strong tendency with there smartness to act by being more and more perfection since they have to adapt and to survive and they want to be great perfection so that to solve most of humans problems and it is the goal of morality to be this "perfection" at best, so i think that since humans have this strong tendency so i think it is like there is no free will. Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo More philosophy about the real numbers in mathematics.. I will ask the following philosophical question: Can we know more about real numbers in mathematics? Notice that real numbers in mathematics is like a general "concept" that permits to generally represent quantities or such, so you are then noticing that this general concept has an independent life from the reality, since notice that we can find some parts of the real numbers in mathematics that are not real in reality but they are general and they ensure that real numbers in mathematics work in all the cases in reality, but notice that the real numbers in mathematics are also inferred from reality, it is like a concept that is also inferred from the reality, so when we say "1", i think that the "1" in real numbers is inferred from the reality, but we can find other real numbers that are not real and that generalize. It is like the concept of a "cat" or "dog", if we look carefully at those concepts you will notice that they are both the reality and not the reality, since a concept of a dog is an abstraction that is not the reality, but it is also a generalization that is the reality, so we are abstracting the concept so that to generalize. More philosophy about relativity of time and relativity.. I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that there Einstein special relativity that determines that time is relative, but i say that the zero in the axis of real numbers in mathematics that represents a meaning is also "relative", i mean we can say that we have zero "of" a thing, so you are then noticing that the axis of real numbers is like a general "concept", i mean it is like a general concept that permits to represent like a quantity or such, but since as i made you understand (read my thoughts below) that the law of causation doesn't apply to some things such as the wide space of the universe, so we can not say there is "zero" thing, since for example things such as the wide space of our universe or multiverse have always existed, read my thoughts below of philosophy so that to understand it. More philosophy about time and space and matter and our universe.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart and now i will ask a philosophical question of: From where come time and space and matter of our universe and why our universe is fine-tuned for consciousness? First you can read the following about science: "The laws of thermodynamics say they always existed. Matter is created by energy. All matter consists of energy. This energy is electromagnetic. Light is electromagnetic energy when it decays it creates a background radiation to the universe. Energy cannot be created from nothing or destroyed to nothing, it mutates into another form. Without time there would be infinite space and without space there would be infinite time. Spacetime is a fabric with dimensions and is part of the physical universe. Space and time are inseparable. Everything that exists inside of it is part of it. Time has always existed with space the proportions are all that have changed. Science is trying to explain when the proportions changed." And read the following that says that there is a Multiverse from where has formed our fine-tuned universe: Our Improbable Existence Is No Evidence for a Multiverse https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LGP8A8s6N9c So i think that there is something really important to notice, since i think that for example the wide "space" of our universe or the multiverse has always existed, so we can then say that there is no cause that has created the wide "space" of our universe or multiverse, so then we can then say that we can not give a meaning by the law of causation in such case, since the law of "causation" doesn't apply to some things such as the wide space of the universe, so then we can logically infer that there is some things such as God or the wide space of the universe that have no cause that has created them, so then we can logically infer that we humans have the tendency to think things by using the law of causation, but i think it is a big logical mistake, because there is things such as the wide space of the universe that have no cause. And here is the logical proof that God exist: Read the following of outer body experiences and you will notice that the soul from God exists: More proof of the existence of God.. You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read especially the outer body experience of the 57-year old man below, it is the proof that the soul from God exists): "A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops beating. The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who have all suffered a cardiac arrest. The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after being pronounced clinically dead. One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy while he was technically dead." Read more here: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven And read the following: Does God exists ? You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read especially about the following study where two per cent exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body ) Read more here: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html Yet more philosophy about the essence of God.. As you have just noticed, i have just explained that the nature of God is that he is greatly arrogant(read my thoughts below), so he likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such, so in my new monotheistic religion we have to "glorify" God and it means to give glory to Him, so look in the following muslim video how muslim white people are glorifying God: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3xjz4nxzGQ&list=RDBXBdyJitlRk&index=10 More philosophy about the nature of God.. I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is: "Who is an arrogant person? Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the one who acts as if they're superior, more worthy, and more important than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down. At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They want to be appreciated for the great things they've done and for their special qualities and abilities." And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and fear him and ask him for help. More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that God has let prophet Muhammad writes and talks as a human in many of the parts of the Qur'an with his human defects, and God has also let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God with his human defects, I mean God had programmed prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talks and writes in the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there human defects, so God is the greatest, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that look like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also come from the curse from God, and the facts also prove that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali.. https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context": More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man.. So look at the following video of Jesus Christ: Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will explain my new monotheistic religion: You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus Christ was living over this earth. Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi: Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it (it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can be logically inferred from the first). More philosophy about what is an idea and more.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I will ask a philosophical question of: What is an idea ? I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and in my philosophy i say that an idea can be an idea that doesn't exist in the physical reality, and we can notice it in mathematics that we can have constructions of ideas that don't exist |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 03 02:45PM -0700 Hello, More about DNS-based DDoS attacks and more.. Here is the ultimate guide to preventing DNS-based DDoS attacks: The ultimate guide to preventing DNS-based DDoS attacks Read more here: https://www.infoworld.com/article/2612835/the-ultimate-guide-to-preventing-dns-based-ddos-attacks.html And read my following previous writing: How to protect organizations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures and web server.. I invite you to read the following article about how to protect organiations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures, i think it needs tools dedicated to mitigating DDoS attacks on the infrastructure. These detect the unusually high volume of traffic generated by an attack, then eliminate the threat using intelligent "routing" to control the DDoS threat, read the following article so that to notice it: How to protect organizations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsecurite.developpez.com%2Factu%2F315475%2FComment-proteger-les-organisations-face-aux-attaques-DDoS-visant-les-infrastructures-DNS-par-Philippe-Alcoy-specialiste-de-la-Securite-chez-Netscout%2F And read the following: How ransomware players are adding DDoS attacks to their arsenal "According to Cyber security firm NETSCOUT, by combining file encryption, data theft and DDoS attacks, cybercriminals have essentially developed three-pronged ransomware designed to increase payment possibilities. SunCrypt and Ragnor Locker ransomware are said to be the first to use this tactic. But since then, other operators have also followed, including Avaddon and Darkside, the perpetrator of the Colonial Pipeline incident. From the perspective of threat actors, adding DDoS attacks to the list of ransomware services is a smart business move" Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsecurite.developpez.com%2Factu%2F315711%2FComment-les-acteurs-des-ransomwares-ajoutent-des-attaques-DDoS-a-leur-arsenal-pour-augmenter-la-pression-sur-les-victimes%2F More philosophy about Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks.. I invite you to read the following interesting article: Businesses blame rivals for DDoS attacks https://www.computerweekly.com/news/450414239/Businesses-blame-rivals-for-DDoS-attacks And here is also how to prevent your Web Server from Denial-of-Service attack: You have to limit requests to the server by for example doing this: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19146-01/819-2629/gdhhn/index.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 03 01:52PM -0700 Hello, How to protect organizations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures and web server.. I invite you to read the following article about how to protect organiations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures, i think it needs tools dedicated to mitigating DDoS attacks on the infrastructure. These detect the unusually high volume of traffic generated by an attack, then eliminate the threat using intelligent "routing" to control the DDoS threat, read the following article so that to notice it: How to protect organizations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsecurite.developpez.com%2Factu%2F315475%2FComment-proteger-les-organisations-face-aux-attaques-DDoS-visant-les-infrastructures-DNS-par-Philippe-Alcoy-specialiste-de-la-Securite-chez-Netscout%2F And read the following: How ransomware players are adding DDoS attacks to their arsenal "According to Cyber security firm NETSCOUT, by combining file encryption, data theft and DDoS attacks, cybercriminals have essentially developed three-pronged ransomware designed to increase payment possibilities. SunCrypt and Ragnor Locker ransomware are said to be the first to use this tactic. But since then, other operators have also followed, including Avaddon and Darkside, the perpetrator of the Colonial Pipeline incident. From the perspective of threat actors, adding DDoS attacks to the list of ransomware services is a smart business move" Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsecurite.developpez.com%2Factu%2F315711%2FComment-les-acteurs-des-ransomwares-ajoutent-des-attaques-DDoS-a-leur-arsenal-pour-augmenter-la-pression-sur-les-victimes%2F More philosophy about Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks.. I invite you to read the following interesting article: Businesses blame rivals for DDoS attacks https://www.computerweekly.com/news/450414239/Businesses-blame-rivals-for-DDoS-attacks And here is also how to prevent your Server from Denial-of-Service attack: You have to limit requests to the server by for example doing this: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19146-01/819-2629/gdhhn/index.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 03 11:53AM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about the human free will and more.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so if we ask the following philosophical question: Is there any free will ? I think humans have no free will, since they have the strong tendency with there smartness to act by being more and more perfection since they have to adapt and to survive and they want to be great perfection so that to solve most of humans problems and it is the goal of morality to be this "perfection" at best, so i think that since humans have this strong tendency so i think it is like there is no free will. Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo More philosophy about the real numbers in mathematics.. I will ask the following philosophical question: Can we know more about real numbers in mathematics? Notice that real numbers in mathematics is like a general "concept" that permits to generally represent quantities or such, so you are then noticing that this general concept has an independent life from the reality, since notice that we can find some parts of the real numbers in mathematics that are not real in reality but they are general and they ensure that real numbers in mathematics work in all the cases in reality, but notice that the real numbers in mathematics are also inferred from reality, it is like a concept that is also inferred from the reality, so when we say "1", i think that the "1" in real numbers is inferred from the reality, but we can find other real numbers that are not real and that generalize. It is like the concept of a "cat" or "dog", if we look carefully at those concepts you will notice that they are both the reality and not the reality, since a concept of a dog is an abstraction that is not the reality, but it is also a generalization that is the reality, so we are abstracting the concept so that to generalize. More philosophy about relativity of time and relativity.. I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that there Einstein special relativity that determines that time is relative, but i say that the zero in the axis of real numbers in mathematics that represents a meaning is also "relative", i mean we can say that we have zero "of" a thing, so you are then noticing that the axis of real numbers is like a general "concept", i mean it is like a general concept that permits to represent like a quantity or such, but since as i made you understand (read my thoughts below) that the law of causation doesn't apply to some things such as the wide space of the universe, so we can not say there is "zero" thing, since for example things such as the wide space of our universe or multiverse have always existed, read my thoughts below of philosophy so that to understand it. More philosophy about time and space and matter and our universe.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart and now i will ask a philosophical question of: From where come time and space and matter of our universe and why our universe is fine-tuned for consciousness? First you can read the following about science: "The laws of thermodynamics say they always existed. Matter is created by energy. All matter consists of energy. This energy is electromagnetic. Light is electromagnetic energy when it decays it creates a background radiation to the universe. Energy cannot be created from nothing or destroyed to nothing, it mutates into another form. Without time there would be infinite space and without space there would be infinite time. Spacetime is a fabric with dimensions and is part of the physical universe. Space and time are inseparable. Everything that exists inside of it is part of it. Time has always existed with space the proportions are all that have changed. Science is trying to explain when the proportions changed." And read the following that says that there is a Multiverse from where has formed our fine-tuned universe: Our Improbable Existence Is No Evidence for a Multiverse https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LGP8A8s6N9c So i think that there is something really important to notice, since i think that for example the wide "space" of our universe or the multiverse has always existed, so we can then say that there is no cause that has created the wide "space" of our universe or multiverse, so then we can then say that we can not give a meaning by the law of causation in such case, since the law of "causation" doesn't apply to some things such as the wide space of the universe, so then we can logically infer that there is some things such as God or the wide space of the universe that have no cause that has created them, so then we can logically infer that we humans have the tendency to think things by using the law of causation, but i think it is a big logical mistake, because there is things such as the wide space of the universe that have no cause. And here is the logical proof that God exist: Read the following of outer body experiences and you will notice that the soul from God exists: More proof of the existence of God.. You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read especially the outer body experience of the 57-year old man below, it is the proof that the soul from God exists): "A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops beating. The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who have all suffered a cardiac arrest. The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after being pronounced clinically dead. One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy while he was technically dead." Read more here: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven And read the following: Does God exists ? You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read especially about the following study where two per cent exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of "seeing" and "hearing" events – or out-of-body ) Read more here: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html Yet more philosophy about the essence of God.. As you have just noticed, i have just explained that the nature of God is that he is greatly arrogant(read my thoughts below), so he likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such, so in my new monotheistic religion we have to "glorify" God and it means to give glory to Him, so look in the following muslim video how muslim white people are glorifying God: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3xjz4nxzGQ&list=RDBXBdyJitlRk&index=10 More philosophy about the nature of God.. I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is: "Who is an arrogant person? Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the one who acts as if they're superior, more worthy, and more important than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down. At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They want to be appreciated for the great things they've done and for their special qualities and abilities." And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and fear him and ask him for help. More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions.. I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ, so i think that God has let prophet Muhammad writes and talks as a human in many of the parts of the Qur'an with his human defects, and God has also let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God with his human defects, I mean God had programmed prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talks and writes in the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there human defects, so God is the greatest, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that look like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also come from the curse from God, and the facts also prove that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali.. https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context": More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man.. So look at the following video of Jesus Christ: Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will explain my new monotheistic religion: You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus Christ was living over this earth. Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi: Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it (it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book): https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can be logically inferred from the first). More philosophy about what is an idea and more.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I will ask a philosophical question of: What is an idea ? I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and in my philosophy i say that an idea can be an idea that doesn't exist in the physical reality, and we can notice it in mathematics that we can have constructions of ideas that don't exist in the physical reality or that also can not be applied to the physical reality, so now we can say that an idea can have an independent life from the physical world or can be not be independent from the physical world, so an idea can be both physical and not physical, and the not physical of it can look like the "software" in a computer and the physical of it can look like the "hardware" of a computer. And in my philosophy(read it below) i also say that an idea can be both smartness and meaning, and why i am saying so? because you can use a mathematical formula without its meaning and you can also know about its meaning. I also think mathematics describes reality or theory with a great precision, this is also why we can "abstract" and/or "model" and/or "simulate" reality or theory with mathematics, also i think that mathematics can be independent of reality when we are working in mathematical theory, but the mathematical theory that is independent of reality can then be applied to reality, also i think that mathematics permits to optimize and verify, and we can also know about it by for example asking a philosophical question of: What is logic in mathematics? , so i think logic in mathematics maps logical expressions to logical variables and to logical operators and from that it permits to logically model with those logical variables and the logical operators and it permits to solve and verify the logical model, i will give an example so that you understand: Take as an example in logic in |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 03 11:23AM -0700 Hello... I invite you to read the following most new article about Free Will: A Famous Argument Against Free Will Has Been Debunked Read more here: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/09/free-will-bereitschaftspotential/597736/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 03 10:22AM -0700 Hello, I invite you to read the following interesting article: There's no Such thing as Free Will Read more here: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/theres-no-such-thing-as-free-will/480750/ And i invite you to look at the following interesting video about Free Will: Closer To Truth - Big Questions in Free Will https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uRTjfhIf4M Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment