- More philosophy about the creativity and innovation.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about China and Globalization and semiconductors.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about understanding K-means Clustering in Machine Learning and more.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about cyber security.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about my thoughts and writing.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 07 04:49PM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about the creativity and innovation.. The most important is to notice that a country such as USA can not lead in every or most areas of technology, because it is not a practical model, so what is doing USA is being "strategic", so it is leading in some "very" important areas of technology. Let's take a quick example: For example USA wants to lead in 3D Chips, read the following so that to notice it: I invite you to read how USA Intel company invented an entirely new insulation material to help dissipate heat in there new 3D packaging technology that stacks logic chips atop one another and we call the new Intel CPU "Lakefield" 3D Chip, read more here to notice it: https://www.wired.com/story/intel-lakefield/ And Taiwan's TSMC company and Japan want to do the same and there research will focus in particular on tech for 3D chip assembly, allowing the creation of components and chips that are more dense but still small, read carefully the following news so that to notice it: Japan approves chip development project with Taiwan's TSMC Read more here: https://techxplore.com/news/2021-06-japan-chip-taiwan-tsmc.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 07 04:06PM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about China and Globalization and semiconductors.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video, that make you understand that the model of European Union or USA that is an expert in most components of technology or such is not a practical model, since it is for example really really hard to invest in most areas of technology and be an expert on most areas of technology, so you have to understand the main advantages of globalization by looking at the following interesting smart video: Can China catch up with US on semiconductors? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghQ7Xq3m0k4 Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 07 02:26PM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about understanding K-means Clustering in Machine Learning and more.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just read about The K-means clustering algorithm, and i think it is also for grouping similar data points together and discover underlying patterns, it is why it is used in machine learning, i have just quickly understood it, so i invite you to read about it in the following interesting article: Understanding K-means Clustering in Machine Learning https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-k-means-clustering-in-machine-learning-6a6e67336aa1 And to be more smart, i invite you to look in the following at how K-means Clustering algorithm is used smartly in a delivery store optimization that optimizes the process of good delivery using truck drones by using a combination of k-means to find the optimal number of launch locations and a genetic algorithm to solve the truck route as a traveling salesman problem. And here is a paper from the journal of industrial engineering and management on the subject, you have to read it carefully, since i am reading it and understanding it and i think that i will implement it soon in Delphi and Freepascal using a Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for the Traveling Salesman Problem: Optimization of a Truck-drone in Tandem Delivery Network Using K-means and Genetic Algorithm https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/88986/1929-8707-1-pb.pdf?sequence=1&isallowed=y More precision about more philosophy about human smartness and about artificial intelligence.. I have to be more precision, so here is the definition in the dictionary of "pattern" that i am using in my thoughts of my philosophy below: Pattern is a particular way in which something is done, is organized, or happens. Read here in the dictionary to notice it: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pattern I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask the following philosophical question: What is human smartness or intelligence ? I will answer it by saying the following: I think we call it human smartness because it discovers "useful" patterns in the reality, so reality can contain static systems or dynamic systems that contain smartness in form of useful patterns etc., so human smartness uses its smartness to "discover" those useful patterns so that to become more and more smart, and by discovering the useful patterns i also means knowing about there meanings of those useful patterns so that to understand them, it is by logical analogy like discovering the rules so that to become smart, so for example when we are doing mathematics we can discover the useful rules or useful patterns like the theorems in mathematics by using deductive logic and inductive logic, so i can go further and say that Swarm intelligence like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is a self-organization, and Self-organization, also called (in the social sciences) spontaneous order, is a process where some form of overall order arises from local interactions between parts of an initially disordered system. The process can be spontaneous when sufficient energy is available, not needing control by any external agent, so then Swarm intelligence like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is self-organization since notice that the exploration mechanism of PSO that is the global optimization is "collaborating" with the exploitation mechanism of PSO that is the local optimization so that to self-organize by finding the global optimum , so then we can call Swarm intelligence like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) a form of intelligence, this is why we call it artificial intelligence. Also you can read more about my thoughts of my philosophy about human smartness in the following web link: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs Read my following thoughts about artificial intelligence and PSO so that understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/BKGvkTI5FY4 More philosophy about Markov chains and invariants and Petri nets.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I am also working with Petri Nets and Markov chains in mathematics and structural analysis of Petri nets in mathematics, so i will talk about it now: About Markov chains in mathematics and more.. In mathematics, many Markov chains automatically find their own way to an equilibrium distribution as the chain wanders through time. This happens for many Markov chains, but not all. I will talk about the conditions required for the chain to find its way to an equilibrium distribution. If in mathematics we give a Markov chain on a finite state space and asks if it converges to an equilibrium distribution as t goes to infinity. An equilibrium distribution will always exist for a finite state space. But you need to check whether the chain is irreducible and aperiodic. If so, it will converge to equilibrium. If the chain is irreducible but periodic, it cannot converge to an equilibrium distribution that is independent of start state. If the chain is reducible, it may or may not converge. So i will give an example: Suppose that for the course you are currently taking there are two volumes on the market and represent them by A and B. Suppose further that the probability that a teacher using volume A keeps the same volume next year is 0.4 and the probability that it will change for volume B is 0.6. Furthermore the probability that a professor using B this year changes to next year for A is 0.2 and the probability that it again uses volume B is 0.8. We notice that the matrix of transition is: | 0.4 0.6 | | | | 0.2 0.8 | The interesting question for any businessman is whether his market share will stabilize over time. In other words, does it exist a probability vector (t1, t2) such that: (t1, t2) * (transition matrix above) = (t1, t2) [1] So notice that the transition matrix above is irreducible and aperiodic, so it will converge to an equilibrum distribution that is (t1, t2) that i will mathematically find, so the system of equations of [1] above is: 0.4 * t1 + 0.2 * t2 = t1 0.6 * t1 + 0.8 * t2 = t2 this gives: -0.6 * t1 + 0.2 * t2 = 0 0.6 * t1 - 0.2 * t2 = 0 But we know that (t1, t2) is a vector of probability, so we have: t1 + t2 = 1 So we have to solve the following system of equations: t1 + t2 = 1 0.6 * t1 - 0.2 * t2 = 0 So i have just solved it with R, and this gives the vector: (0.25,0.75) Which means that in the long term, volume A will grab 25% of the market while volume B will grab 75% of the market unless the advertising campaign does change the probabilities of transition. So notice that in my previous post i have talked about invariants of the system, here is my previous post read it carefully: About Turing completeness and parallel programming.. You have to know that a Turing-complete system can be proven mathematically to be capable of performing any possible calculation or computer program. So now you are understanding what is the power of "expressiveness" that is Turing-complete. For example i am working with the Tool that is called "Tina"(read about it below), it is a powerful tool that permits to work on Petri nets and be able to know about the boundedness and liveness of Petri nets, for example Tina supports Timed Petri nets that are Turing-complete , so the power of there expressiveness is Turing-complete, but i think this level of expressiveness is good for parallel programming and such, but it is not an efficient high level expressiveness. But still Petri nets are good for parallel programming. About deadlocks and race conditions in parallel programming.. I have just read the following paper: Deadlock Avoidance in Parallel Programs with Futures https://cogumbreiro.github.io/assets/cogumbreiro-gorn.pdf So as you are noticing you can have deadlocks in parallel programming by introducing circular dependencies among tasks waiting on future values or you can have deadlocks by introducing circular dependencies among tasks waiting on windows event objects or such synchronisation objects, so you have to have a general tool that detects deadlocks, but if you are noticing that the tool called Valgrind for C++ can detect deadlocks only happening from Pthread locks , read the following to notice it: http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/hg-manual.html#hg-manual.lock-orders So this is not good, so you have to have a general way that permits to detect deadlocks on locks , mutexes, and deadlocks from introducing circular dependencies among tasks waiting on future values or deadlocks you may have deadlocks by introducing circular dependencies among tasks waiting on windows event objects or such synchronisation objects etc. this is why i have talked before about this general way that detects deadlocks, and here it is, read about it in my following thoughts: Yet more precision about the invariants of a system.. I was just thinking about Petri nets , and i have studied more Petri nets, they are useful for parallel programming, and what i have noticed by studying them, is that there is two methods to prove that there is no deadlock in the system, there is the structural analysis with place invariants that you have to mathematically find, or you can use the reachability tree, but we have to notice that the structural analysis of Petri nets learns you more, because it permits you to prove that there is no deadlock in the system, and the place invariants are mathematically calculated by the following system of the given Petri net: Transpose(vector) * Incidence matrix = 0 So you apply the Gaussian Elimination or the Farkas algorithm to the incidence matrix to find the Place invariants, and as you will notice those place invariants calculations of the Petri nets look like Markov chains in mathematics, with there vector of probabilities and there transition matrix of probabilities, and you can, using Markov chains mathematically calculate where the vector of probabilities will "stabilize", and it gives you a very important information, and you can do it by solving the following mathematical system: Unknown vector1 of probabilities * transition matrix of probabilities = Unknown vector1 of probabilities. Solving this system of equations is very important in economics and other fields, and you can notice that it is like calculating the invariants , because the invariant in the system above is the vector1 of probabilities that is obtained, and this invariant, like in the invariants of the structural analysis of Petri nets, gives you a very important information about the system, like where market shares will stabilize that is calculated this way in economics. About reachability analysis of a Petri net.. As you have noticed in my Petri nets tutorial example (read below), i am analysing the liveness of the Petri net, because there is a rule that says: If a Petri net is live, that means that it is deadlock-free. Because reachability analysis of a Petri net with Tina gives you the necessary information about boundedness and liveness of the Petri net. So if it gives you that the Petri net is "live" , so there is no deadlock in it. Tina and Partial order reduction techniques.. With the advancement of computer technology, highly concurrent systems are being developed. The verification of such systems is a challenging task, as their state space grows exponentially with the number of processes. Partial order reduction is an effective technique to address this problem. It relies on the observation that the effect of executing transitions concurrently is often independent of their ordering. Tina is using "partial-order" reduction techniques aimed at preventing combinatorial explosion, read more here to notice it: http://projects.laas.fr/tina/papers/qest06.pdf About modelizations and detection of race conditions and deadlocks in parallel programming.. I have just taken further a look at the following project in Delphi called DelphiConcurrent by an engineer called Moualek Adlene from France: https://github.com/moualek-adlene/DelphiConcurrent/blob/master/DelphiConcurrent.pas And i have just taken a look at the following webpage of Dr Dobb's journal: Detecting Deadlocks in C++ Using a Locks Monitor https://www.drdobbs.com/detecting-deadlocks-in-c-using-a-locks-m/184416644 And i think that both of them are using technics that are not as good as analysing deadlocks with Petri Nets in parallel applications , for example the above two methods are only addressing locks or mutexes or reader-writer locks , but they are not addressing semaphores or event objects and such other synchronization objects, so they are not good, this is why i have written a tutorial that shows my methodology of analysing and detecting deadlocks in parallel applications with Petri Nets, my methodology is more sophisticated because it is a generalization and it modelizes with Petri Nets the broader range of synchronization objects, and in my tutorial i will add soon other synchronization objects, you have to look at it, here it is: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/how-to-analyse-parallel-applications-with-petri-nets You have to get the powerful Tina software to run my Petri Net examples inside my tutorial, here is the powerful Tina software: http://projects.laas.fr/tina/ Also to detect race conditions in parallel programming you have to take a look at the following new tutorial that uses the powerful Spin tool: https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/perfbook/perfbook.html Here is how to install Spin Model Checker on windows: I invite you to look at this video to learn how to install Spin model checker and iSpin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGzmtWi4Oq0 I have installed them and configured them correctly and i am working with them in parallel programming to detect race conditions etc. This is how you will get much more professional at detecting deadlocks and race conditions in parallel programming. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 07 12:50PM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about cyber security.. Many Fortune 500 tech companies use extremely weak passwords Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsecurite.developpez.com%2Factu%2F315820%2FDe-nombreuses-entreprises-technologiques-du-Fortune-500-utilisent-des-mots-de-passe-extremement-faibles-selon-les-resultats-d-une-enquete%2F More about DNS-based DDoS attacks and more.. Here is the ultimate guide to preventing DNS-based DDoS attacks: The ultimate guide to preventing DNS-based DDoS attacks Read more here: https://www.infoworld.com/article/2612835/the-ultimate-guide-to-preventing-dns-based-ddos-attacks.html And read my following previous writing: How to protect organizations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures and web server.. I invite you to read the following article about how to protect organiations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures, i think it needs tools dedicated to mitigating DDoS attacks on the infrastructure. These detect the unusually high volume of traffic generated by an attack, then eliminate the threat using intelligent "routing" to control the DDoS threat, read the following article so that to notice it: How to protect organizations from DDoS attacks targeting DNS infrastructures https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsecurite.developpez.com%2Factu%2F315475%2FComment-proteger-les-organisations-face-aux-attaques-DDoS-visant-les-infrastructures-DNS-par-Philippe-Alcoy-specialiste-de-la-Securite-chez-Netscout%2F And read the following: How ransomware players are adding DDoS attacks to their arsenal "According to Cyber security firm NETSCOUT, by combining file encryption, data theft and DDoS attacks, cybercriminals have essentially developed three-pronged ransomware designed to increase payment possibilities. SunCrypt and Ragnor Locker ransomware are said to be the first to use this tactic. But since then, other operators have also followed, including Avaddon and Darkside, the perpetrator of the Colonial Pipeline incident. From the perspective of threat actors, adding DDoS attacks to the list of ransomware services is a smart business move" Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsecurite.developpez.com%2Factu%2F315711%2FComment-les-acteurs-des-ransomwares-ajoutent-des-attaques-DDoS-a-leur-arsenal-pour-augmenter-la-pression-sur-les-victimes%2F More philosophy about Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks.. I invite you to read the following interesting article: Businesses blame rivals for DDoS attacks https://www.computerweekly.com/news/450414239/Businesses-blame-rivals-for-DDoS-attacks And here is also how to prevent your Web Server from Denial-of-Service attack: You have to limit requests to the server by for example doing this: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19146-01/819-2629/gdhhn/index.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jun 07 10:15AM -0700 Hello, More philosophy about my thoughts and writing.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I just said yesterday the following; "I think i am smart, and i will explain my way of thinking and i think it is genetical in me, i am thinking the other humans like interesting smart games that i need to play smartly, but i don't mean that i am a bad person, since i am a gentleman type of person, but so that to advance smartly, i need to view the others like interesting smart games that i have to play smartly, so our world is for me like full of those interesting smart games like Democracy and humans etc. that i need to play smartly. So our world is for me like an engine that pushes me forward with more and more perfection." I also want to make rational decisions based on outcome, and not thinking in terms of gains and losses using mental heuristics that often led them to sub-optimal choices, so i also want to make optimal decisions, and i am like abstracting, so when i am saying: "I am thinking the other humans like interesting smart games that i need to play smartly", so it is an abstraction of what i want to be, since i want to be smart and play it smartly and i need to be good emotional intelligence and of course i am a gentleman type of person. More philosophy about our world.. I think our world is a very interesting world, since look for example at Democracy , it is a smart game, so it appeals to our smartness, and it is like an engine that brings more and more perfection, and it brings a kind of "joy" of playing it smartly, and i think that our world is full of those very interesting smart games that appeal to our smartness, this is why i think our world is like an engine that pushes us forward with more and more smartness, so i am very positive about our world. More philosophy about Democracy and beautiful poetry.. Being a good democratic player in Democracy is like playing smartly at a game of chess, it is smartness in action, it is a smart proactivity, Democracy is a beautiful smart game and it is a very interesting game, but you have to know the rules of the game of Democracy, that democracy is not exactness of morality, but it needs to be exactness of morality, so it needs proactivity and it needs an well educated society and it needs competitive elections and free press and it needs to forbid extremism like neo-nazism or communism or the political far-right or white supremacism and such extremist behaviors. So being a good democratic player is like writing beautiful poetry, so here is one of my beautiful poems of Love, read it carefully: I will explain more my new poem of Love below that is called: "Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ?" So i am starting my new poem of Love by saying the following: "Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? Since is it not so fun to be as someone who has just won? Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? Since as you notice i want to be as the interesting one !" So if you are smart, you will notice that: is the the beautiful heat of the Sun by chance or not by chance ? so as you notice that we have gotten this "beautiful" heat of the Sun in our universe by chance, so then we have won this beautiful heat of the Sun by chance, so it is like in human life that we can also win by chance, since when you are genetically smart or such you have also won it by chance too etc. so now you are understanding better my new poem of Love, since when i a say: "Since as you notice i want to be as the interesting one !" Since it means that i want to be a winner like we humans have won the beautiful heat of the Sun in this universe, and i want to win the hearts of the people or to win the heart of my Love. So read all my poems below to understand: More of my philosophy about Love and about my poetry of Love... Now you have to understand me, you are seeing me writing my poems of Love, but you have to understand my personality, so i will ask again the question of: What is Love? You have to understand, if i say: I love you very much. So as you are noticing that this sentence is expressing Love, but this sentence follows an organized "plan" , and it is that this sentence is organized correctly so that the others understand the sentence, so i think that so that to express love this needs to be "organized" correctly, so then i think that so that to be Love that is not handicaped, it needs smartness and it needs from us to be organized correctly and it needs from us to organize Love correctly. More philosophy about my poetry of Love.. You have to notice that my poetry of Love are like "management", because i am thinking them fast and writing them fast, so i have to give them a more beautiful rhythm and i have to manage them so that they look more beautiful, and i think that this needs a good emotional intelligence and social intelligence too, so now more philosophy on emotional intelligence and social intelligence (or interpersonal intelligence): Now I'm going to ask a smart question and it is the following: What is emotional intelligence and social intelligence (or interpersonal intelligence)? I answer this: When I give you 5 words which are the following: love, very, much, I, you So notice that for intelligence you need a plan to compose the following sentence from the above words: "I love you very much" So the intelligence of emotional intelligence and social intelligence is also "like" "management", since they make it possible to organize it and to make it order that is I believe the most "important" part of management, but to make it order or to organize it needs a "plan", but the plan to follow in order to be order (order in general or order in love to be able to to be love) is also intelligence including emotional intelligence and social intelligence, So emotional intelligence and social intelligence are also a plan that organize it or make it order, since they organize or regulate our behaviors so that to be order, and order is so important to achieve the necessary perfection. More philosophy on love. You have noticed that I am a white Arab, and you have also noticed that I have written several poems of Love in front of you, but now I am going to like to ask a smart question: What is love ? I think that expressing love is an intelligence like an emotional intelligence and social intelligence (or interpersonal intelligence) that I believe is so "important", because I believe that love is also emotional intelligence and social intelligence which organize or manage or regulate our behaviors so that to be order, and order is so important to achieve the necessary perfection. Here is my new poem of Love that is called: "Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ?" I invite you to listen to the following beautiful music and reading at the same time my new poem of Love below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nU9tJwltsMs Here is my new poem of Love: -- Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? Since is it not so fun to be as someone who has just won? Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? Since as you notice i want to be as the interesting one ! Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? Since i also don't want our beautiful Love to be undone ! Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? Since i am also not coming to you with the war and the gun ! Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? So stay near me since we are like a lovely atom and its lovely electron Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? So am i the human living in Montreal or in London ? Look at this beautiful heat of the Sun, is it not so fun ? So i say that i am like an Angel and i am not like a Demon And our beautiful Love is like the so beautiful ascension ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. --- More philosophy about democracy and about dictatorship.. I think i am smart, and i am understanding the objections of white supremacism and neo-nazism, but i think that neo-nazism and white supremacism want to be dictatorship like communism of China, but i think there is a misunderstanding of Democracy, Democracy is not exactness of morality, since when you want to be exactness of morality you will require to be dictatorship, but when you want to be dictatorship, dictatorship has the tendency to be corruption of morality, and i also define corruption of morality as lack of efficiency, so i think that Democracy is better than dictatorship since i think that the requirements of democracy is also to not be "extremism" of politics, like being the political far-right or the neo-nazism or white supremacism or communism and such, and it is an important requirement of democracy. And here is more of what my philosophy says about democracy: Here is what my political philosophy says about Democracy.. More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality.. And now i will start by asking a philosophical question: Is Democracy morality ? I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive", read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to know that they have to be progressive: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4 And we can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy.. Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ? When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also we can logically prove it by saying the following: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical question, and it is the following: Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has: From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and a country can become a more global world like European union or such. More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy.. I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012: ---- More about China and Russia and other such countries education system.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, read the following: "Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education is no exception," Mr. Li said. A Chinese Education, for a Price Read more here: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i don't think it is meritocratic ! It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it: Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass examinations and obtain a diploma. RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities Read more here: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are. ---- And also i have just posted about the today China after the anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following: --- I invite you to read the following interesting article: China's Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/ --- So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt the education system and when education system is corrupt then the Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press, read my following thoughts to understand more: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. Now why to be Democracy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment