| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 16 07:04PM +0100 >> Maintainer: Nikki Locke - if you wish to contact me, please use the form on the website. > Feel free to add my messaging and serialization library to > your list -- https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards Or don't. The library (or its author) appears to be homophobic judging by links on its website. /Flibble |
| Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Aug 16 11:50AM -0700 On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 2:04:50 PM UTC-4, Mr Flibble wrote: > > your list -- https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards > The library (or its author) appears to be homophobic judging > by links on its website. What links? I don't see anything along those lines on the github site. Daniel |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 16 08:03PM +0100 On 16/08/2017 19:50, Daniel wrote: >> The library (or its author) appears to be homophobic judging >> by links on its website. > What links? I don't see anything along those lines on the github site. The project website is linked from github (http://webebenezer.net) and the link "Links" on that site is http://webebenezer.net/links.html and the first link on that is to some homophobic Christian website. /Flibble |
| Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>: Aug 16 07:06PM > The project website is linked from github (http://webebenezer.net) and > the link "Links" on that site is http://webebenezer.net/links.html and > the first link on that is to some homophobic Christian website. Hm, I can't see anything homophobic on that site. I even can't see that it is Christian site. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit... |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 16 10:12PM +0100 On 16/08/2017 20:06, Melzzzzz wrote: >> the first link on that is to some homophobic Christian website. > Hm, I can't see anything homophobic on that site. I even can't see that > it is Christian site. "If children don't deserve to have a father and a mother, who does?" ^^ homophobic /Flibble |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 16 10:16PM +0100 On 16/08/2017 20:06, Melzzzzz wrote: >> the first link on that is to some homophobic Christian website. > Hm, I can't see anything homophobic on that site. I even can't see that > it is Christian site. They seem to have mysteriously removed all the egregious articles and replaced it with a landing page. https://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2013/03/same-sex-marriage-opponents-link-gays-nazis-again /Flibble |
| Real Troll <Real.Troll@Trolls.com>: Aug 16 05:30PM -0400 On 16/08/2017 20:06, Melzzzzz wrote: > Hm, I can't see anything homophobic on that site. I even can't see that > it is Christian site. There is nothing wrong in being homophobic. Nature made two types of people - a man and a woman. The idea was opposites attract and procreate; Flibble and Dave Brown are homosexuals and they attract each other but they are freaks. Call me what you may but homosexuals have no place in my organization. they bring diseases and incurable illnesses like aids. By the way I don't like religious freaks either and that idiot by the name of Rick has no place in my inbox. I have not seen any of his posts for a very long time unless somebody is stupid enough to reply to him and so quote his post in full. |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 17 12:14AM +0100 On 16/08/2017 22:30, Real Troll wrote: > Flibble and Dave Brown are homosexuals and they attract each other but > they are freaks. Call me what you may but homosexuals have no place in > my organization. they bring diseases and incurable illnesses like aids. No place in your organization? Care to tell us which organization that is? Words are cheap when you hide behind anonymity "Real Troll". /Flibble |
| Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>: Aug 16 11:20PM >> Hm, I can't see anything homophobic on that site. I even can't see that >> it is Christian site. > "If children don't deserve to have a father and a mother, who does?" Depends on context. If you go to that site you will see that there is nothing homophobic there. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit... |
| kushal bhattacharya <bhattacharya.kushal4@gmail.com>: Aug 16 01:37AM -0700 On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 1:19:01 AM UTC+5:30, Paavo Helde wrote: > strings somehow? Why not small strings, for example? And why do they not > ruin the terabytes of youtube videos downloaded every day, for that > matter? Have the Sockets declared some kind of personal vendetta on you? No no i am not talking about ruining any thing as a simple transport but suppose an intermediate person somehow gets access do to this data ,then if no encoding is there there may be such that the data may get modified |
| kushal bhattacharya <bhattacharya.kushal4@gmail.com>: Aug 16 01:48AM -0700 On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 1:19:01 AM UTC+5:30, Paavo Helde wrote: > strings somehow? Why not small strings, for example? And why do they not > ruin the terabytes of youtube videos downloaded every day, for that > matter? Have the Sockets declared some kind of personal vendetta on you? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/201479/what-is-base-64-encoding-used-for Please refer to the answer of this link i think this validates my point of using an encoding format here |
| Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>: Aug 16 10:01PM +1200 On 08/16/17 08:48 PM, kushal bhattacharya wrote: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/201479/what-is-base-64-encoding-used-for > Please refer to the answer of this link i think this validates my > point of using an encoding format here The answer specifically mentions "some protocols may interpret your binary data as control characters". You said you were using a direct socket connection, no additional protocols. The introductory paragraph in the answer is wrong for many situations where data *is* transferred by just streaming the data over the wire in a raw format. -- Ian |
| kushal bhattacharya <bhattacharya.kushal4@gmail.com>: Aug 16 03:16AM -0700 On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 3:31:50 PM UTC+5:30, Ian Collins wrote: > by just streaming the data over the wire in a raw format. > -- > Ian Actually later there may be usage of some additional protocols via the sockets so this is just a preliminary test phase going on |
| "Öö Tiib" <ootiib@hot.ee>: Aug 15 11:27PM -0700 On Tuesday, 15 August 2017 23:47:33 UTC+3, R.Wieser wrote: > > Oh, sorry, David Brown explained it why it happens. > Kiddo, you do not even seem to understand the difference between a > possibility and a proven fact. Does that "Kiddo" mean that you are older than me? That may explain your bitter behavior; people even older than me usually have inveterate conditions that hurt and sometimes cause them to grizzle. Microsoft and Google tools tend to have incompatibilities that neither side will fix. So it is good for working hypothesis, can you prove it wrong? > For the rest, Good luck with your "jokes", and good luck with Alf and your > attempt to find a bystander so you can agree with each other how all you > guys did was right, and "that other" had everything wrong. I did not say that you did anything wrong. It was all your sore, patronizing and disparaging tone of communication that is joke of its own. Sorry if it makes me laugh, but it makes. Who you think you are? You demonstrate it in this post as well. > (though someone else had no problem with doing so), even though it was one > of the simpelest, most concise you could ever get. *And* it was even > accompanied with the relevant example code ! I certainly do make mistakes. Several, every day. My mistakes have made me rich. It can be that I misunderstood your question, so what? I certainly start to forget the nuances of decade old C++ compilers and 32 bit platforms. I don't use these, that's why. So sue me. Can't? Then drown everything in your bile. :D > doesn't ammount to much. And your "bedside manners" -- where you pull > stuff outof your ass ("wrappers" and "big mess") and present it as truth -- > leaves something to be desired too. Oh, you are clearly mirroring here. Is the pain of yours in the butt? Are you in bed? Do you feel being unimportant niggler? If it is so then sorry, shit happens. Realize, none of it is my fault so you are being unjust here. > I've got a nice joke for you: I went to school for free. You on the other > hand went for nothing. :-) (here, have your smiley back) Its ofcourse > nasty to say, but as I've presented it as a joke ... lolsz ? :) Good joke but not about me. I was educated by Soviet Union ages ago. It wasn't "for free", it was liability. We had obligation of youth to study. It was "To Learn, to learn, to learn!" said Lenin. Oh, I did actually like it. Whatever is up with you ... I hope it gets better. Good day. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment