Thursday, August 17, 2017

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 4 topics

Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 17 12:26AM +0100

On 17/08/2017 00:20, Melzzzzz wrote:
 
>> "If children don't deserve to have a father and a mother, who does?"
 
> Depends on context. If you go to that site you will see that there is
> nothing homophobic there.
 
The article to which that quote refers to has been removed. It was
homophobic.
 
/Flibble
"Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com>: Aug 17 02:43AM +0200

On 8/16/2017 8:04 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> your list -- https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards
 
> Or don't. The library (or its author) appears to be homophobic judging
> by links on its website.
 
I think it's all right to /be/ homophobic, or whatever.
 
But it's another matter to argue for discrimination of homosexuals.
 
I think very different psychological mechanisms are involved in the
phobia case and the discrimination case. A person who is phobic about
something doesn't necessarily discriminate on that basis. A person who
discriminates (or argues for it) doesn't necessarily have a phobia.
 
 
Cheers!,
 
- Alf (very off-topic)
woodbrian77@gmail.com: Aug 16 05:50PM -0700

On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 1:04:50 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> > your list -- https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards
 
> Or don't. The library (or its author) appears to be homophobic judging
> by links on its website.
 
I'm a bopper -- biblically oriented programmer.
 
In spite of a lot of anti-religious bigotry from
people here, I'm doing fine and the company is doing
fine.
 
 
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - "You are the light of the world.
A city on a hill cannot be hidden." Matthew 5:14
 
http://webEbenezer.net
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Aug 17 09:43AM +0200

On 17/08/17 01:14, Mr Flibble wrote:
 
> No place in your organization? Care to tell us which organization that
> is? Words are cheap when you hide behind anonymity "Real Troll".
 
> /Flibble
 
Look at his posting name - he is /trolling/ ! It was not one of his
best efforts, which are much more subtle. In fact, it was so blatant
that I think it was just his way of condemning homophobia with sarcasm.
 
Of course, we hit Poe's law here:
 
<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law>
Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>: Aug 17 09:00PM +1200


> In spite of a lot of anti-religious bigotry from
> people here, I'm doing fine and the company is doing
> fine.
 
Bigotry? Pot, kettle.
 
--
Ian
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Aug 17 12:14PM +0200

On 17/08/17 02:43, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
 
>> Or don't. The library (or its author) appears to be homophobic judging
>> by links on its website.
 
> I think it's all right to /be/ homophobic, or whatever.
 
That would depend on what is meant by "homophobic", I think. As a
strict psychological term, it would mean having an irrational fear of
homosexuals or homosexuality. This, I think, would be a very rare
condition. For real phobias, the sufferer knows it is irrational and
sees it as a disadvantage - just ask anyone with arachnophobia or
claustrophobia, for example.
 
The common use of the term is for people who /choose/ to dislike
homosexuals and/or homosexuality. It is still irrational, of course,
but they do not see it as irrational - they rationalise it to themselves
(by claims about their religion, or that it is "destroying families", or
"unhealthy" or "unnatural").
 
> But it's another matter to argue for discrimination of homosexuals.
 
Absolutely agreed - like other discrimination, it is to be abhorred.
 
Somewhere in the middle we are left people who dislike homosexuals
and/or homosexuality, but do not discriminate on it. These are not
psychologically homophobic - their dislike is a choice or a product of
choices, such as their interpretation of their religious beliefs. If it
is possible for them to put those dislikes aside and not act on or
promote them, then I it is fine - it becomes just personal preference.
 
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Aug 17 12:18PM +0200


> In spite of a lot of anti-religious bigotry from
> people here, I'm doing fine and the company is doing
> fine.
 
I think most people have nothing against people being religious or
believing in whatever supernatural entities they want. Most of us do,
however, have something against the bigotry and other evils that some
people perpetrate using their religion as an excuse.
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 17 04:57PM +0100


> In spite of a lot of anti-religious bigotry from
> people here, I'm doing fine and the company is doing
> fine.
 
Bigotry is using religion or "God" as an excuse to spread hatred about
minority groups.
 
/Flibble
woodbrian77@gmail.com: Aug 17 10:42AM -0700

On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 10:58:04 AM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> > fine.
 
> Bigotry is using religion or "God" as an excuse to spread hatred about
> minority groups.
 
I started Ebenezer Enterprises because I think marriage
(a man and a woman) is important. Why is it important?
Because children are important and they deserve to have
both a father and a mother.
 
Another defender of conservative beliefs is Ben Shapiro
over at Dailywire.com
. His podcasts and articles are examples of American
exceptionalism.
 
 
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - Enjoy programming again.
http://webEbenezer.net
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 17 06:59PM +0100

> (a man and a woman) is important. Why is it important?
> Because children are important and they deserve to have
> both a father and a mother.
 
So the rapist must marry his victim so the child can have a father and
mother? You are fucking bigoted idiot Brian.
 
/Flibble
woodbrian77@gmail.com: Aug 17 11:21AM -0700

On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 12:59:28 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> > both a father and a mother.
 
> So the rapist must marry his victim so the child can have a father and
> mother?
 
 
If the victim is single, she could give the baby up
for adoption. I support castration for rapists.
 
Please don't swear here.
 
 
Brian
red floyd <dont.bother@its.invalid>: Aug 17 11:28AM -0700


> Please don't swear here.
 
Fuck off.
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 17 07:42PM +0100

>> mother?
 
> If the victim is single, she could give the baby up
> for adoption. I support castration for rapists.
 
Either the victim doesn't want the child in which case abortion is
preferable or she wants the child in which case who the fuck are you to
say she can't be a single mum?
 
YOU ARE A FUCKING BIGOT BRIAN.
 
/Flibble
Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se>: Aug 17 07:07PM

On Thu, 2017-08-17, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
...
> (a man and a woman) is important. Why is it important?
> Because children are important and they deserve to have
> both a father and a mother.
 
I normally stay out of these offtopic threads, but that makes no sense
to me at all, and I'm curious:
 
/Why/ is that important? A lot more children grow up with only one
parent, or one sane parent and one who's impaired by insanity or drug
abuse, or who's beating his partner, or the child has no real parent
at all. A lot of those children grown up okay. So why is it a
problem if both parents are men, or women? After all, parenting
doesn't involve using your genitals.
 
"Blind guides, who strain out the gnat but gulp down the camel" comes
to mind.
 
I'm not PC, and I am saddened by Leigh's endless trolling, which may
have provoked you to write things you really don't believe much -- but
this is obvious to me. It's also obvious to Christian friends of
mine. Why isn't it obvious to you?
 
/Jorgen
 
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 17 03:34PM -0400

On 8/17/2017 3:07 PM, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> have provoked you to write things you really don't believe much -- but
> this is obvious to me. It's also obvious to Christian friends of
> mine. Why isn't it obvious to you?
 
You are in error, Jorgen.
 
The Bible is absolutely clear that marriage was intended by God to
be only between a man a woman. If you look at the Law of Moses, it
contains death for homosexuals. If you look at the destruction of
Sodom and Gomorrah you see that God destroyed those cities before
the day of judgment as a warning to the rest of them.
 
In the New Testament, Paul calls homosexuality a vile affection,
an error, and states that those who engage in such things have
turned against God and nature and are doing things which are
inconvenient and are of a reprobate mind (Romans 1:26-27):
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+1&version=KJV
 
We also have the direct passage which states that homosexuality
will literally keep someone out of Heaven, and that includes all
who agree with homosexuality even if they do not actively engage
in it with their own bodies:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+6%3A9-10&version=KJV
 
You'll note the quote there: "abusers of themselves with
mankind." This was the term for homosexuality when the King
James Bible was written in the early 1600s. More modern
translations have it written in our words:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+6%3A9-10&version=ISV
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+6%3A9-10&version=NIV
 
And in general Biblical philosophy you have God creating them
male and female, stating it was not good for the man to be alone
when He had only at that time made Adam. He put Adam to sleep
and brought him someone to keep him from being alone, and it was
Eve. The Bible records that for this reason will a man leave
his mother and father and go and be united to his wife and the
two shall no longer be twain, but shall be one flesh.
 
And then there is the bride of Christ (the church) being married
in eternity to the Bridegroom (Jesus), such that we are going to
receive all He has through this marriage, as He receives all we
have, just as our marriages here on Earth.
 
Gay marriage is a complete abomination against God. It is
literally Satan's teaching regarding a false form of "love" that
is used to describe that type of relationship. Satan is trying
to grant to the meaning of "love" an abomination before God,
trying to deceive us through our flesh-based reasoning mind,
such that we will buy into the concept that "love is love" and
the like.
 
-----
The truth remains solidly given to mankind by God, and nobody
who embraces homosexuality will enter into Heaven, unless they
repent and ask forgiveness for their sin ... and this remains
true no matter what percentage of the population says, "No, it
is okay to be gay."
 
It never is okay to be gay as it goes against everything God
has established in His creation here for the understanding of
man on the Earth.
 
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Aug 17 08:46PM +0100

On 17/08/2017 20:34, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
> It never is okay to be gay as it goes against everything God
> has established in His creation here for the understanding of
> man on the Earth.
 
Alternatively God doesn't exist and gay marriage is absolutely fine.
Your bigotry couldn't be any more egregious Rick.
 
/Flibble
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 17 03:55PM -0400

On 8/17/2017 3:46 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> Alternatively God doesn't exist and gay marriage is absolutely fine.
 
That is the teaching of Satan. It is his hope that you will believe
it to the point of your death whereby you will die in your sin and
unforgiven by Jesus for it, so that your eternal soul will be cast
into Hell.
 
> Your bigotry couldn't be any more egregious Rick.
 
It is Satan's teaching that the people who teach the things of God
are bigots and the like. It is Satan's teaching that the things
of God, which are really right and true, are "wrong" (by his false
teaching), because Satan is the enemy of God, and the enemy of man.
 
-----
You are being deceived by an enemy who wishes you destroyed, Leigh.
If you want to the know the truth, seek it for real, and God Himself
will make sure you find it. Not me. Not anyone else. But God will
know if you are truly seeking the truth or not, and He alone will
lead you to it.
 
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin
Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>: Aug 18 08:02AM +1200

On 08/18/17 07:34 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
> It never is okay to be gay as it goes against everything God
> has established in His creation here for the understanding of
> man on the Earth.
 
People are what they are, not what they chose to be.
 
Bigotry is a choice.
 
--
Ian
Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com>: Aug 17 12:48PM -0700

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 7:03:00 PM UTC+1, R.Wieser wrote:
> in the vc++ program), but have no idea about the/its side-effects.
 
> Like who is responsible for freeing the objects memory in case a virtual
> destructor is executed.
 
I think you may be confused about what a destructor is. A destructor does not kill off an object. An object can be killed off in various ways. One is if it has been created using "new" and you call "delete" on it. Another is if it is an automatic variable (a "local" variable) and the program reaches the end of the block it is in. When the object is destroyed, two things happen - the destructor is called, and the memory occupied by the object is freed. So the destructor does not kill the object, but is a chance for the programmer to specify what happens when the object is killed by some other means. For example, the destructor can be used to close any open files, or it can free some other memory that the object has allocated (but not the memory used by the object itself).
 
So, whether it's a virtual destructor or not, you do not need to worry about freeing the memory actually occupied by the object. Unless you've used "placement new".
 
 
> The same goes for the "delete(object)" command. I assume it its, apart
> from zeroing-the object variable after the method call returns, fully
> equivalent to "object->~object();", but am not at all sure of it.
 
I don't think that there's any guarantee it will zero the memory, but it will free it, yes.
 
> I have googled, but I only seem to be able to find pages talking about
> derived classes, which is most certainly not how I'm using it.
 
The only point in declaring the destructor virtual is if you are at least planning on having derived classes. The point is that you can then delete a derived class using a pointer of type "pointer to base".
 
> So, in the case of a virtual destructor, who is responsible for/does the
> releasing of the objects allocated memory ? And are there other (side)
> effects I should be aware of ?
 
No, it should all work as planned. Virtual destructors are good.
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Aug 17 11:47AM -0400

Eternity begins when we leave this world. For some that means
joy. For other it means terror.
 
All of us will spend eternity somewhere. Unless your sin has
been forgiven, for you it will be in the lake of fire writhing
in agony and torment unending. It will consume your existence
and overrun you completely. You'll never have another free
thought, a moment of contemplation, a some real consideration,
but the pain and agony and torture will consume everything about
you.
 
That is the end for all who reject the truth. Who refuse to
acknowledge their sin, and who refuse to acknowledge they are
in need of a savior.
 
What Jesus offers you is eternity in the paradise of Heaven,
face-to-face with God in a place He's prepared for you, in an
immortal body. God is offering to give you the Kingdom.
 
Total forgiveness for your sin is found only in Him. He is
willing to completely restore you to Himself in eternity.
It is even His good pleasure to give you the Kingdom. He will
do this for all who will hear the truth, who will acknowledge
their own sin, and ask Him to forgive them. There will be no
one who comes to Him who is cut off or cast out. The only souls
who will be cut off are those who who, by their hard heart, refuse
to accept Him, to come to Him and ask forgiveness. Such people
totally deny the truth, and Hell was created to hold all manner
of falseness in a fully and completely self-contained space. All
who enter in to Hell will never return, because they are a cancer
upon truth, serving only the needs of falseness ... which, like
cancer, continue to eat away at all that is good until it is
perverted and destroyed, and that God will not abide in His
Kingdom, in eternity in His House.
 
-----
Jesus has gone ahead and prepared a place for you. It is a place
in Heaven. It is beautiful and glorious. He's put your name on
it and reserved it for you. He's done this so you can go there
and be with Him where He is in all things forever. You've been
provided for. Well taken care of. Looked after. And it will
continue to go on. No more struggling. No more heartache or
trials or pains or sufferings. The old ways will have passed in
Heaven, having been resigned only to our existence here.
 
God wants us thriving and living and shining and blossoming and
doing great and wonderful things worthy of His creation in us.
He wants more than anything to forgive us and restore us to this
purposeful intent He had for us before sin entered in to this
world and your life and destroyed everything.
 
-----
All you have to do is acknowledge that you're a sinner, and ask
Him to forgive you, and believe in your heart that He is capable
of doing this. How is it possible? It is logical. Jesus went
to the cross sinless. God the Father supernaturally reached
across all time and put the sin of all who would believe on the
name of Jesus onto Him at the cross.
 
Jesus died here on Earth in the body with our sin charged to Him.
This made Him pay for sin in our place. He became our sacrifice,
so that God would pour out the punishment He demands for sin upon
His own Son, rather than upon us. In so doing, He set us free
from judgment! Jesus gets judged in our place, and we are released
from God's judgment and are not judged, but are gifted the fullness
of Christ's own righteousness. We are made spotless and perfect by
what Jesus did at the cross. Jesus is consumed of God, and we are
set free.
 
Please note: Jesus did this willingly! It was His choice to do
this for us because He loves us and wants us to be with Him. But,
He wants us to recognize our place. We are not taking advantage of
Him by receiving His offering. It is literally THE reason He came
into the world ... to save that which was lost (us) to sin. But it
comes with real knowledge, a real acknowledgement of who He is and
who we are not.
 
This pastor does an excellent job of describing this here (begins
at 34:56, at 35:50, at 38:18, at 40:13, at 40:55. I would advise
you to listen to it. What He teaches here are God's words of
life given so that we might be redeemed.
 
God doesn't want us tricked or fooled or deceived by the devil.
He wants us to follow Him and to know the truth. He wants us to
overcome the devil by our faith in Him, and by Him saving us,
and giving us the new nature which comes with salvation, that
thing which is achievable no other way, but only by His completed
work at the cross:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_x1tWGfy0&t=34m56s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_x1tWGfy0&t=35m50s
 
"In 2 Cor 5, Jesus goes from the essence of God to the
essence of sin. How far apart is that? From the
essence of God to the essence of sin? That's the
love of God. 2 Corinthians 5:17+ to the end of the
chapter."
 
"What's going on here? That we might be made the
righteousness of God in Him. He made Him to be sin,
not a sinner, but sin. It's why God turned His back
on Him. And [Jesus] cried from the cross, 'My God,
My God, why hast Thou forsaken me?' In plainer words,
from the highest possible place, the essence of God,
to the lowest possible place on this Earth. You can't
get any lower than that. When He died on the cross,
He died there as the essence of sin. 'Father, into
thy hands I commend my spirit' [Jesus said]. That's a
wonderful thing, because it tells me that He who spared
not His only Son, who offered Him up for us all..."
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_x1tWGfy0&t=38m18s
The God of the Second Chance. He instructs you. He
will chasten you go guide you as a good father would
his son whom he loves.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_x1tWGfy0&t=40m13s
He'll chasten you. He'll forgive you. He'll love you.
He'll fellowship with you. He'll walk with you. He'll
commune with you. You're His son/daughter. And all He
wants you to do is acknowledge that, come back to Him
and say, "Lord I need your strength, there's a sin that
besets me, there's a sin I'm having a hard time getting
a victory over. I need you Lord, I need your strength.
I need your forgiveness." And it'll come. It'll come.
It'll come from a gracious heart. He's a longsuffering
God. And you'll learn after years of that ... it'll
build your faith. It will strengthen your walk with God.
 
-----
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_x1tWGfy0&t=40m55s
 
"You'll begin to understand the graciousness of one who
allowed sin to come into the universe to begin with.
You gotta get that nailed down in your soul. He did
not react to the entrance of sin. Known unto God are
all of His works. And then you begin to understand
something about the one who allowed it to happen in the
beginning so that He would teach an unforgettable lesson
to His creation, because they would learn something about
God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Ghost that they
could never learn any other way. And when the day comes
that you ever stand in His presence, you'll jump up and
down and shout and glorify God and say 'Hallelujah!
Hallelujah! Hallelujah! I don't deserve to be here,
but You've been good to me. Hallelujah to God!'
Hallelujah! He's been a good God. You'll sing with the
redeemed and you'll shout and rejoice because you know
the one that's sitting on that Throne. And He is worthy!
He's worthy of our praise and our adoration. Because we
know Him. He's proven Himself to us. He's lifted us
from the dunghill to very Palace of the King."
 
-----
Ask Jesus to forgive your sin today, and enter in to eternity
as a living soul. Leave the fate of the judged and condemned.
There will be no returning from that final judgment, and that
final condemnation to the lake of fire where every soul cast
in will spend a conscious eternity in writhing agony and utter
torment because they totally rejected the truth. It is the
sufficient "prison" God created for an eternal being made in
the image and likeness of God, with the real power and authority
He affords us by our very design and nature in His creation.
On this Earth a lion is a fierce creation capable of much because
of how he's put together. We are made in the image and likeness
of God and we are powerful creations. And to constrain those in
this children-of-God form, nothing less than Hell would suffice,
and what He created as Hell is wholly sufficient to keep all evil,
all sin, all falseness out of His universe forever. Nothing that
enters in to the lake of fire will ever escape. No not ever. It
is the ongoing death that never ebbs, but is the full containment
for eternal beings who cannot die, in a place where they can do no
harm to the rest of God's creation.
 
-----
This is your salvation in Jesus Christ. He is saving from that
end. Jesus is offering you everything for free. All you have to
do is ask Him and you can be released from judgment, released from
condemnation and live forever in an angel-like body, with unlimited
resources, under the ongoing tutelage of an infinite God who has so
many more things to teach us in this vast universe He created ...
we've only scratched the surface of the surface here in this world
and in our Earthly understanding. What remains is infinite, because
the God who created it is infinite.
 
-----
Do not enter into judgment in eternity over matters of selfish and
foolish pride, or over a particular lust over some thing here in
this world that you don't want to give up. What is coming for us
in eternity is so much better than what we have today that they
could not even be weighted on the same scale.
 
Choose the way of truth, and of life. Cast off the devil's shiny
trinkets of traps and snares. Say no to his apparent nice things
which are only veils for death. Ask Jesus to forgive your sin and
feel the weight of God's eternal judgment come off of you in a way
that you can feel. And feel the new life enter in to your soul in
a way that you can feel. And feel His free gift of eternity assert
itself within your soul in a way that you can feel. What He gives
you by way of a full pardon ... it is tangible, and it's more than
a prisoner would feel when he's let go from prison, because you are
that prisoner, and you'll be let go from an eternal prison
 
I love you so much that I'm willing to teach you all of this at
the expense it will cost me ... but even with my loss to you in
the cases where there is loss, it is to my greater gain for those
who do hear. And know this: Jesus loves you far more than I do
because He is Love literally, and He is capable of loving you in
a full, complete, and eternal way even right now.
 
Ask Him to forgive your sin. Do it today. Right now. This very
second. Choose eternity. Choose life. Choose truth. And make
the choice for you, your family, your friends, your co-workers.
Lead them all to this same glorious end of living in the paradise
of Heaven with God in a body like the angels, with a home in a
place where even the streets are paved with gold, and how much
more so the beautiful things?
 
Give yourself permission to be set free from your sin. Give
yourself permission to come to Jesus and ask Him to forgive you.
Give yourself permission to receive this, His greatest gift for
you. And act on that decision right now.
 
Love you,
Rick C. Hodgin
kushal bhattacharya <bhattacharya.kushal4@gmail.com>: Aug 16 10:58PM -0700

Hi,
Is there any c++ library as such third party or built in, that dumps set of c++ code based on certain command from the main c++ program into a file (which would make a fresh c++ program by dumping c++ code based on commands passed from the main c++ program)?
Thanks
"Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com>: Aug 17 08:27AM +0200

On 8/17/2017 7:58 AM, kushal bhattacharya wrote:
> dumps set of c++ code based on certain command from the main c++
> program into a file (which would make a fresh c++ program by dumping
> c++ code based on commands passed from the main c++ program)? Thanks
 
That's easy to write, unless you have some really special requirements.
 
The main problem is if you want to automate a compiler invocation, since
there's no standard for that.
 
You can require the user to provide a script for that.
 
 
Cheers & hth.,
 
- Alf
kushal bhattacharya <bhattacharya.kushal4@gmail.com>: Aug 16 11:30PM -0700

On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 11:57:46 AM UTC+5:30, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
 
> You can require the user to provide a script for that.
 
> Cheers & hth.,
 
> - Alf
 
Could you please provide me some sample code about how to do this :) ?
kushal bhattacharya <bhattacharya.kushal4@gmail.com>: Aug 16 11:35PM -0700

On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 11:57:46 AM UTC+5:30, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
 
> You can require the user to provide a script for that.
 
> Cheers & hth.,
 
> - Alf
 
suppose from the main c++ program i pass command to write code for listening sockets then the code for listening socket would be written to the c++ program file and like this the code would be written based on the command i pass from the main c++ program
kushal bhattacharya <bhattacharya.kushal4@gmail.com>: Aug 17 01:59AM -0700

On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 11:28:32 AM UTC+5:30, kushal bhattacharya wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any c++ library as such third party or built in, that dumps set of c++ code based on certain command from the main c++ program into a file (which would make a fresh c++ program by dumping c++ code based on commands passed from the main c++ program)?
> Thanks
 
Finally, I am dumping those set of codes by calling that required bash script from the main c++ program which has those set of codes to be written on the fresh
c++ program
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: