- Here is my political philosophy - 1 Update
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Aug 20 02:41PM -0400 Hello... Read this: I have defined efficient morality as being performance and reliability that includes security, so beauty is part of reliability because reliability is the quality of being of performing consistently well, and to perform consistently well, you have to be beauty and you have to be social etc. please read my following political philosophy to understand better my thoughts: Communism and hard socialism use Class Struggle, even with violence, as a tool, but this is not like a consistent system, because it is like a state of hate against more intelligent people, or more rich people.. and this being lack of honesty and lack of confidence. This is why you have seen me attacking this problem of Class Struggle, this is a matter of great importance, this is why i have tried to prove that all is not black and white, and this is why tolerance must apply here, but i have tried to prove also that this tolerance i am talking about is inferred from empirical moral as a constrain that enhance optimization, that means that enhance performance and reliability that includes security. Elevated consciousness.. To reach this level it would be necessary to optimize more and i have defined optimization as being performance and reliability, what allowed me to reach an elevated consciousness is that I have been in contact with philosophy and i have done mathematics and i have done operational research and i have done computer science and i have done also politics and so on. This is what makes you become an elevated consciousness, and when you reach this elevated consciousness, you begin to feel rich, it is like wealth, I can like affirm that i am rich in this elevated consciousness, but is it an elevated consciousness? I affirm it because I am able in reality to compare myself to presidents and so on. And in doing so, i am like convinced that I have reached an elevated consciousness. Here is my abstracted political model at first, i have first attacked the problem of Class Struggle of nazism and communism and after that i have showed you what it has to be world wide.. please read all the following to understand my abstracted view that is more correct: Hitler was a national socialist, and since he was also a socialist, the nature of his socialism was violent, so he has applied the tool of Class Struggle with violence against jews , because jews were superior with there intelligence etc. , and since he was a nationalist, his Class Struggle with violence against jews was also a racial Struggle with violence against jews. But read what follows to understand my thoughts: About the essence of communism and the essence of nazism Communism starts from an observation that humans are not equal from the point of view of money and intelligence performance and memory performance and speech and language articulation performance etc. then it says that to give more equal chances, we must use the tool of Class Struggle even if it uses violence. Nazism is national socialism that applies the tool of Class Struggle to fight jews, because jews are superior with there intelligence and money. Now the view of national socialism of nazism and communism is a narrow view, because even of we are high intelligence , we can be not high performance of memory or/and we can be not high performance of speech and language articulation and we can have more risk to construct and to operate and to make successful our private companies etc. so this means that even if we are high intelligence , we can still suffer more, so this tells us that all is not black and white, so from the this point of view , we can not apply Class Struggle of communism and nazism easily, because all is not black and white as i have explained, other than that allowing the rich to be rich , is because we want richness to maximize performance and reliability and security and we want richness because the one that wants to become rich can have more risk and suffers more as i have explained, but to be more fair , we have to be more helpful to the weakest members among us, and we have to be a correct social system. About discrimination and hate.. If you are still immature you will say that i am a white arab, so you will say that you can not be confident with arabs, so you will start to discriminate.. that's an inferior thinking, you have to be able to see the big picture, that means you have to be aware of the economic model of today, you will say that Donald Trump is protectionism, but Donald Trump is aware of the constrains , so he knows about the advantages of Fordism, and he knows also that we are trying to play the game of Fordism by giving the necessary wages to others to be able to buy your products and services, this is not socialism, this is part of thinking bigger in economy, the old way of thinking of racism and hate is the easy and simplistic way of thinking, we know about it , but we have to be smarter and be convinced of the game of today, protectionism must be smart, today we can not be protectionism by hating and discriminating stupidly, because arabs have to be learned how to think the advantages of Fordism and how to think Adam Smith's specialization Theory, this is part of the game of today, also having a great number of people inside the society , like is having USA, is an economic advantage that avoids extremism of the past , by avoiding extremist protectionism, so all in all you understand me more.. and related to what i am saying , i have also said: So you hear for example that: Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must constrain justice, that's not the language of love.. because that's not a correct view, because we are constrained by empirical moral that says that a kind of tolerance over responsability plays the role of an heuristic that optimizes our economic system and our social system, like when we are applying a kind of tolerance over arab immigrants that are useful to the economic system and to the social system, so usefulness is the key point also that optimizes the system and that constrain the system to be a kind of tolerance over responsbility by not saying that arab immigrants are not as beautiful as white europeans and be discrimination with them, that's not the language of love, because the language of love is also optimization that mandate a kind of tolerance over responsability, this is the same when i say that optimization is the language of love also , because we must know how to be compassion and respect and love towards arabs and africans to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index, also democracy is subjected to a constrain of financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, this is a counter-power that creates more quality and more world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility. So as you see optimization is the language of love. What is the essence of organization ? Those are the questions that we ask in courses of philosophy. Now i have to be smartness and rationality and logic to answer this question. Smartness is an important requirement that fulfill this goal. And you have to learn how to think Sir and Madam.. So how can we attack this problem ? When you start thinking it is like also abstracting to the essentials to be able to simplify our thinking.. So this process of abstraction needs also my smartness to decompose efficiently... Smartness is also a fast process that finds fast the shortest path to the solution or that finds the solution to the problem.. So my smartness will answer like this: Look at our essence, we are a composition of consciousness and physical body.. But we can try to say that we are guided by the process of survival of fittest.. But this is not good abstraction.. We have to be smartness.. So why do we need to organize ? You will say that we have to be organized because of the process survival of the fittest.. But this is a narrow view.. Because it is a definition that is pejorative and not efficient.. Because of the following question: Why we need to survive better ? It is because of our weaknesses. But i say that it is still not a correct answer , because it is too much abstraction that lacks efficiency. Because our weaknesses need to be organized by optimization. This is the magical word, it is optimization. Why do we optimize ? to be more powerful and more reliability and correctness. You will ask a question such as: Is optimization: reliability and correctness ? My answer: When you are not reliable and/or correctness you are less efficient, so efficiency is also reliability and correctness. This is why i have abstracted the essence of organization to the process of optimization. But that's lacking Abstraction. Because we have to look at the composition of optimization. Optimization is performance and reliability. So that the essence of organization is the composition of optimization that is performance and reliability. So the essence of optimization is not only performance , but it is reliability. And that's also efficient morality, and efficient morality is Liberty and Liberty is efficient morality. So now my answer is not finished: Because the optimization is constrained.. Because corruption of morality is related to optimization.. So how can we measure corruption of morality ? What is corruption of morality ? This is an interesting subject.. It's like abstracting, you have to decompose and compose.. You can say for example what are the causes of corruption of morality? You can say what is the consequences of corruption ? You can define efficiently morality to be able to know about corruption. So if you define morality you will define it as a composition of: Guidance of moral, and a priori pure moral and empirical moral. And now you see that the difficulty is how to set the reference to be able to measure corruption of morality with it. What is the reference of morality ? The reference must be optimization that knows how to be optimization. I mean that optimization can not set itself as being performance alone. And optimization can not set itself to be extreme justice that lacks optimization, like ignoring the optimization by the "heuristic" of "tolerance" that optimizes the economic system and the social system. And optimization must be an effort to maintain stableness and reliability of the system, that means reliability of the system, this is related to security, and security is also related to compassion and love and respect, because neglecting compassion , love and respect do cause extremism and violence that hurt the system. How optimization must be this effort ? because discipline and progress are inherent to Liberty, so you have to enforce them efficiently and wisely by the hard way, that means by laws and by the soft way that i talked about.. So all in all the schema seems to be more clear and seems to indicate to us more what is corruption of morality, and it indicate to us what is the essence of organization.. I was thinking more, and here is my new thinking: Determinism easy for us to set the truth and sets the way of logic, and this truth and way of logic must be computed by our brain to create a consistent system that is efficient morality that is optimization that is performance and reliability. So there is some truth that hurts and some truth that is efficient morality that is optimization that we call tolerable or good, so the essence of truth is based on our essence that is our consciousness of space-time and the determinism of our empirical and physical world, and about the essence of logical consistency of the system, you can understand it by example like this: About the consistency of the system We call it consistency of the system.. When the system is: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium The system above doesn't allow to say that: A is smaller than B Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that A is smaller than B only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. And The system above doesn't allow to say that: B is smaller than C Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that B is smaller than C only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. So the system has to be consistent, so the system force you to say all at the same time: A is smaller than B B is smaller than C B is medium So that to be strict and clear to not create any contradiction. And about the essence of measure.. Philosophy is like mathematics.. Now what is the essence of measure ? I think that the reference is the consciousness of space-time as i have explained, adjoined with the senses of measure that we have, such as the sense of orientation and the sense of measuring space and saying that this is bigger than this etc. those ingrediants permit us to measure, i will ask for example, what is a point (in geometry) ? to understand a point we must map it to our consciousness of space-time as i have explained, so this is rooted on the physical empirical world, even if we are using our senses of measure, so this is why i have explained that mathematical logic and the mathematical Set theory for example are also rooted on the physical and empirical world , but the space-time can be relative or general, relativeness permit also to measure the truth , but this seems to create some contradictions in the system, this has been showed in my writing and explanation of my previous post of what is the essence of love and what is love, but i have showed that this can be resolved by using the reference of the general morality of the society as the reference that permits to measure and that must be enforced by laws and police. The essence of the Truth What is a Truth ? what is the essence of the Truth ? That's an important question.. Philosophy is like mathematics, because Philosophy must be based on efficient morality and efficient morality is optimization and optimization is performance and reliability. So if you look at mathematical logic.. What is mathematical logic ? Mathematical logic is also being conscious and feeling the space-time.. Here is why: Now I will give my explanation of what is consciousness... I hope that in my previous messages you have understood my explanation of how the consciousness of time is generated by our brain, I have said that the brain has a sense of direction that makes it possible to say that one object is left or on the right and back or front etc., and the brain is also able to see space in 3 dimensions with the sense of the gaze for example, that is to say to give coordinates as cartesian or polar in three dimensions to objects in the space of reality, and also the brain by means of the sense of |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment