- This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group - 5 Updates
- Semantics of comma operator - 6 Updates
- Inverse Transubstantiation (Buns) - 2 Updates
- The Rapture (Reprise ad infinitum) - 6 Updates
- God needs to be elevated to the front of your life [Jesus Loves You] - 2 Updates
- Peter Cheung's posts - 4 Updates
| mcheung63@gmail.com: Jan 10 07:51AM -0800 This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks |
| James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com>: Jan 10 11:55AM -0700 > This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group Filter his posts to Trash (plonk!). Ignore response threads. -- James Moe jmm-list at sohnen-moe dot com Think. |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Jan 10 07:02PM > This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks I would rather Hodgin simply stop spamming his religious vomit and post about C++ instead. /Flibble -- "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Jan 10 11:39AM -0800 On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 2:03:08 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: > > This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks > I would rather Hodgin simply stop spamming his religious vomit and post > about C++ instead. Me too, but I don't think he can stop, even if he wanted to. It's as if he's been exposed to a severe demonic molestation which manifests itself as obsessive spanning of usenet. |
| David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Jan 10 10:03PM +0100 > This post showing much we want Rick C hodgin to leave this group. If you want him to leave. Leave you name in reply. thanks Personally, I would rather /you/ left it. Rick's religious posts are annoying, but the many fakes, impersonations, and totally tasteless and inhumane comments about his mother are worse IMHO. And Rick does make some on-topic posts - you contribute nothing but your hatred. I really don't care what Rick may or may not have done to provoke you - please take your unpleasantness elsewhere. |
| red floyd <dont.bother@its.invalid>: Jan 09 04:06PM -0800 On 1/9/2018 2:09 PM, Geoff wrote: >>> What is your opinion? >> while( (c = fgetc(in)) != EOF ) > Thanks. I like this better than maintaining the idiomatic use. I always thought that *WAS* idiomatic use. Going back to K&R. |
| Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>: Jan 10 07:39AM > The first loop is idiomatic and correct. Why would anybody write while ((c = fgetc (in)), c != EOF) when they could write while ((c = fgetc (in)) != EOF) |
| asetofsymbols@gmail.com: Jan 10 01:44AM -0800 "idiomatic use" is not while ((c = fgetc (in)) && c != EOF) It is while((c=fgetc(in))!= EOF)... |
| "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com>: Jan 10 11:20AM +0100 On 1/10/2018 8:39 AM, Juha Nieminen wrote: > while ((c = fgetc (in)), c != EOF) > when they could write > while ((c = fgetc (in)) != EOF) The way you write it is by far more common; I've never seen the comma operator separation of side effect and checking before this thread. But they do the same, as opposed to the OP's variation it's just notation this, and some might regard the first as more clear. I think maybe such person might write `s[i] = f(); ++i;`, while you and probably also I would write `s[i++] = f();`. Still I have written the former, because of fear of enticing reader into the world of side-effect expressions. It depends on who one imagines one communicates to I guess. Cheers!, - Alf |
| "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net>: Jan 10 07:12AM -0500 On 01/09/2018 05:09 PM, Geoff wrote: >>> What is your opinion? >> while( (c = fgetc(in)) != EOF ) > Thanks. I like this better than maintaining the idiomatic use. To the best of my knowledge, this IS the idiomatic use. Using the comma operator, which forces you to repeat the 'c', is not idiomatic. |
| legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard): Jan 10 09:02PM [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup] "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> spake the secret code >> while ((c = fgetc (in)), c != EOF) >> when they could write >> while ((c = fgetc (in)) != EOF) Nit: I object to the space after fgetc because it disrupts visual flow. -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com> |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 10 07:07PM When Jesus Christ takes a dump his shit undergoes inverse transubstantiation turning into hot cinnamon buns. This should be proof enough of his divine nature. -- Thank you, Rick C. Hodgin |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 10 12:40PM -0800 On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 2:07:47 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > -- > Thank you, > Rick C. Hodgin Why do you mock me, Leigh? You write the most vile things at times. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Jan 09 04:03PM -0800 On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 4:39:52 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > standing in your arrogance and pride believing you are correct I think that applies to you, Rick :-) And I think the members of your church realize that too. Stuff may be materializing inside your head, illusions of being a great teacher, but I don't share that experience, I can't relate to it, just as I don't share the great mathematician John Nash's experience that aliens were trying to communicate with him through the New York Times classifieds. These are things, I'm afraid, that are highly unlikely to be true, even if they seem real to you. |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 09 04:27PM -0800 On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 7:03:33 PM UTC-5, Daniel wrote: > it, just as I don't share the great mathematician John Nash's experience that > aliens were trying to communicate with him through the New York Times > classifieds. These are things, I'm afraid, that are highly unlikely to be true, even if they seem real to you. As Jesus said: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+7%3A21-23&version=KJV 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. Satan has entered the church and has people wrapped up in churchiosity, and religion, and people move by rote in their own power, and not by the spirit of God ... so much so that when men and women like me show up teaching to really obey and teach about Jesus, we appear so far out of the norm that we are shunned, mistreated, berated, called names, cast out of circles, beaten, mocked, and more: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+5%3A11-12&version=KJV 11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you. It has always been that way for the true servants of God. Even Jesus Himself was rejected and accused of working by demon power, killed by the very people He came to save. Someday you will know the truth. I pray it's sooner rather than later. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Jan 10 12:40AM On 10/01/2018 00:27, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > Himself was rejected and accused of working by demon power, killed by > the very people He came to save. > Someday you will know the truth. I pray it's sooner rather than later. Daniel, please don't reply again as it would be the same as hitting your head against a brick wall. The stubborn unmovable obtuseness of Hodgin is too great to comprehend. /Flibble -- "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Jan 09 04:48PM -0800 On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 7:28:13 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > Satan has entered the church ... Rick, your sentences remind me of Old Betsy, who lived in a small village and said that if god had meant there to be gay people, he would have made Adam and Steve rather than Adam and Eve. It was hard to argue with Old Betsy :-) But we live in the modern world, where arguments matter, reasons matter, research matters, and religious traditions are the subject of scholarly study. |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 09 05:01PM -0800 On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 7:48:32 PM UTC-5, Daniel wrote: > Rick, your sentences remind me of Old Betsy, who lived in a small village > and said that if god had meant there to be gay people, he would have made Adam > and Steve rather than Adam and Eve. It was hard to argue with Old Betsy :-) But we live in the modern world, where arguments matter, reasons matter, research matters, and religious traditions are the subject of scholarly study. It's about your sin and Jesus on the cross, Daniel. You've been taught the truth. You will receive it or reject it. Make it a wise choice. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Jan 10 11:11AM -0800 On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 8:02:07 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > and said that if god had meant there to be gay people, he would have made Adam > > and Steve rather than Adam and Eve. It was hard to argue with Old Betsy :-) But we live in the modern world, where arguments matter, reasons matter, research matters, and religious traditions are the subject of scholarly study. > It's about your sin You probably read my snippet about Old Betsy, and thought to yourself, "Old Betsy makes sense." Just like one or two of the old villagers, with knowing looks on their faces, nodding sagely to themselves. It's a way of thinking that's past and done, there's new thinking pushing through, has been for a few centuries. But there'll always be an Old Betsy, and I suppose, an Old Rick. I still think you should listen to your pastor and the fellowship in your faith community. It seems to me your mind, perhaps like Old Betsy's, is fundamentally binary, either the old texts are in totality inerrant, or they're a complete hoax. Not being able to countenance the latter, you choose the former. But I think you'll find that most Christians have a more subtle and sophisticated, a more nuanced, a more modern, interpretation of the texts, as, of course, do many non-believers. Not everyone, of course, the proof of being Old Betsy. |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 10 08:18AM -0800 The primary teaching here is that we all have an appointment with death. When will that death come? By what form? An accidental trip down a staircase? A slippery patch of ice? A health issue like a heart attack or stroke? Or a car accident? Hit by a bolt of lightning? None of us know when we will die ... but all of us know we WILL die. ----- The enemy tries to get us to focus only on this world, and the things here in this world. But the things here in this world are temporal, and fleeting, and they do not endure, and they are draped in sin and hate and death and war and greed and all that goes with it. What Jesus teaches us at the cross is that WE HAVE VALUE. That WE ARE MORE THAN OUR FLESH. That HE LOVES US and WANTS US TO BE WITH HIM IN HEAVEN. ----- God is who God is: the author and finisher of all things. Until each of us is looking up to Him in that recognition, knowing truly that He is God and we are His creation ... then there is still work to be done to educate the people of this fact ... because ... their eternal soul is riding on that information. ----- For those who are Christians, God needs to be elevated to the absolute front of your life. He needs to be out ahead of every decision, every action, every thought, every deed. We cannot go our own way and have a correct and proper relationship with God. He must be the primary and concluding factor in each of our choices, each of our goals. He must be the reason why we breathe, the reason why we move, the reason why we decide any thing. Until that day comes there is work for each of us (Christians) to do. And if the one to my right or my left falls down in so doing, then I will pick up that flag and keep going. And if I fall down in so doing, may my brother and sister take up the flag after I am gone and continue on. ----- Jesus Christ offers us everything. For free. Just for the asking. And until people place value on that offer, our work here is not done. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| mcheung63@gmail.com: Jan 10 09:41AM -0800 fuck off asshole |
| bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net>: Jan 10 09:13AM -0500 On 01/08/2018 01:23 PM, Daniel wrote: > Tell that to Anne Askew, who was tortured in the Tower of London and burned at the stake because she wasn't convinced by the doctrine of transubstantiation. Or Servetus, because he wasn't convinced by the doctrine of the trinity, or in favour of infant baptism. > But I digress. Jesus doesn't want you to spam usenet, Rick. > Daniel To be fair they probably did that because England spent a lot of time under the rule of psychopaths who just enjoyed executing people. Religion was merely pretext - psychopaths tend to use whatever is convenient/expedient to "explain" motives and actions which at their core don't have any motivation beyond "cuz executing people I don't like is fun and I wanna." "We have to execute you because ah...transubstantiation! Yeah, transubstantiation. That's the ticket" |
| mcheung63@gmail.com: Jan 10 07:47AM -0800 bitrex於 2018年1月10日星期三 UTC+8下午10時14分07秒寫道： > is fun and I wanna." > "We have to execute you because ah...transubstantiation! Yeah, > transubstantiation. That's the ticket" Rick C. Hodin's mother got cancer and is dead. Thanks god |
| mcheung63@gmail.com: Jan 10 07:49AM -0800 Juha Nieminen於 2018年1月9日星期二 UTC+8下午2時19分36秒寫道： > Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: > > Peter became very upset with my posts in alt.os.development. > Because you are a fucking spammer and an asshole. Just shut up. Yes, he is a fucking spammer. God punished him by killed his fucking mother. |
| mcheung63@gmail.com: Jan 10 07:50AM -0800 Ian Collins於 2018年1月9日星期二 UTC+8上午2時48分46秒寫道： > Please go away. > -- > Ian. Ian, he is a fucking spammer, he goes to hell soon. He imagine he can save us, but in fact, we treat him as a fucking idiot. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment