- What is the essence of metathought in philosophy ? - 1 Update
- What is the essence of democracy ? - 1 Update
| Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 25 02:27PM -0500 Hello, Read this: What is the essence of metathought in philosophy ? Why are we thinking the thinking ? This is a good subject of philosophy.. If i ask you question of what is morality ? You will have the tendency to answer like this: That morality is about the good and bad.. But this is too much abstraction that lacks sophistication and understanding, this is too simplistic thinking.. This is why metathought of philosophy is all about, it is a sophistication of our thought or a perfection of our thought that wants to perfect our thinking, this is the essence of humanity that is perfection. And now you are really feeling the essence of philosophy that is the essence of humanity that is: perfection that comprehend ! For example metathought of philosophy is concerned by a subject like: What is the essence of logic ? Here is my answer that is also metahought of philosophy: Determinism easy for us to set the truth and sets the way of logic, and this truth and way of logic must be computed by our brain to create a consistent system that is efficient morality that is optimization that is performance and reliability. So there is some truth that hurts and some truth that is efficient morality that is optimization that we call tolerable or good, so the essence of truth is based on our essence that is our consciousness of space-time and the determinism of our empirical and physical world, and about the essence of logical consistency of the system, you can understand it by example like this: About the consistency of the system We call it consistency of the system.. When the system is: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium The system above doesn't allow to say that: A is smaller than B Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that A is smaller than B only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. And The system above doesn't allow to say that: B is smaller than C Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that B is smaller than C only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. So the system has to be consistent, so the system force you to say all at the same time: A is smaller than B B is smaller than C B is medium So that to be strict and clear to not create any contradiction. And about the essence of measure.. Philosophy is like mathematics.. Now what is the essence of measure ? I think that the reference is the consciousness of space-time as i have explained, adjoined with the senses of measure that we have, such as the sense of orientation and the sense of measuring space and saying that this is bigger than this etc. those ingredients permit us to measure, i will ask for example, what is a point (in geometry) ? to understand a point we must map it to our consciousness of space-time as i have explained, so this is rooted on the physical empirical world, even if we are using our senses of measure, so this is why i have explained that mathematical logic and the mathematical Set theory for example are also rooted on the physical and empirical world , but the space-time can be relative or general, relativeness permit also to measure the truth , but this seems to create some contradictions in the system, this has been showed in my writing and explanation of my previous post of what is the essence of love and what is love, but i have showed that this can be resolved by using the reference of the general morality of the society as the reference that permits to measure and that must be enforced by laws and police. The essence of the Truth What is a Truth ? what is the essence of the Truth ? That's an important question.. Philosophy is like mathematics, because Philosophy must be based on efficient morality and efficient morality is optimization and optimization is performance and reliability. So if you look at mathematical logic.. What is mathematical logic ? Mathematical logic is also being conscious and feeling the space-time.. Here is why: Now I will give my explanation of what is consciousness... I hope that in my previous messages you have understood my explanation of how the consciousness of time is generated by our brain, I have said that the brain has a sense of direction that makes it possible to say that one object is left or on the right and back or front etc., and the brain is also able to see space in 3 dimensions with the sense of the gaze for example, that is to say to give coordinates as cartesian or polar in three dimensions to objects in the space of reality, and also the brain by means of the sense of touch and the eye is capable of the sense of the measurement of the magnitudes in the space of reality, these are ingredients of the brain which gives birth to the consciousness of time, for consciousness of time means that for two objects that follow each other, we are able to feel the existence in space of the back of the first object (by the sens of the orientation of the brain) Which is for example "nothing", and that one also feels the existence in the space of the back of the second object which is the first object, and that we are therefore able to associate the back of the second object to the word "before", and this is how the consciousness of time is engendered ... now i come to a question even more important, but what is consciousness really? i start with an example so that you can understand what it really is: when you touch your hands with water very hot, you are able to feel the pain and to say that it is you who feel the pain, so the meaning of touch is closely linked to the consciousness of the "I", but Let us return, if you like, to the experiences of a child, you will notice that a necessary condition for the child to be able to learn and understand is to be able to ask the question of "what is", but you see this question has as a necessary condition the consciousness of the self, for when the child arises, question of "what is" is that it would mean: "I would like to know what it is", and the "I would like to know" demonstrates the presence of a consciousness of the pre-ego which guide the questioning of the child, but then what is this awareness of the pre-ego that guides the questioning that makes a consciousness too? Here is my answer: I believe that as in the case of the sense of touch which is in close relationship with the consciousness of the ego, the act of reflection is also a sens as the sens of touch that is able to make us feel that we exist and feel the space in three dimensions, as for touching the very warm water that allows us to feel that the feeling of hot water hurts us ... what would I like to say? that the sens of touch and the sens of smell for example are adjoined to space-time to give a better consciousness of space-time, that is, the ideas we have of space-time are not, for example, just rules of logic, but also are recorded with sensations of touch and other sensations to give a better consciousness, so the act of reflection is not just able to logically reason with simple rules of logic for building more complex logic rules etc. But it is also capable of associating space-time sensations with objects that are displaced in a 3-dimensional world, and therefore my theory makes us see the act of thought as also being also another sens that resembles the sens of touch , this is my explanation of how the consciousness and consciousness of the ego is engendered by the brain. When you say in mathematical logic: A or B How do you think you understand this logical rule? You must go back to your childhood when you were to learn it, you were told for example there are two balls, and you had to take just one and give it back, and the teacher made us understand for example the following: when you want to take two balls you are informed with gestures that it is NO, And when you just take one and turn the ball back, you get to know that it is YES, therefore I affirm that it is thanks to the existence of space-time which is also a consequence of our interior sensation of the space-time which gives the consciousness of space-time, I mean you are able for example with your brain to feel and understand what BEFORE or BEHIND Or LEFT or RIGHT, and you are able to feel the space and to say that it exists and what it is, so you are able to feel the space-time, and this sensation in our brain that we have of space-time helps us to understand the logical rule of: A or B, or the logical rule of: A and B. So let us return to the following theorem in mathematical logic: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. So how do you understand the: If A then B? As in my explanation above, you can not understand this rule without being conscious and without feeling space-time, because even if you are a blind person, you can feel your individuality and your singularity which is the consciousness of the ego, and this self-consciousness is a consequence of the sensation in our brain of space-time that allows us to feel that the object which is "WE" is different from other objects etc. Then what makes even the blind man feels the space-time and is capable to say that this object is before that object in time, So it is able to understand the logical rule of: If A then B, and since he is capable of doing so, he is capable, thanks to the sensation of the space-time that we have in our brain, that permit us to understand The following theorem: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. This is my evidence based on the empirical facts and this proves that mathematical logic is also a consequence of the sensation that we have in our brain of space-time, without this sensation we can not, in my opinion, understand mathematical logic, and since the machine is incapable of feeling like a human being space-time, then we can not say that artificial intelligence Is capable of achieving the emergence of consciousness. Now what is the truth ? In mathematical logic the truth is rooted on our consciousness and feeling of space-time as i have explained, so the reference is space-time, so we are capable of deducting the truth by mapping mathematical logic to our consciousness and our feeling of the space-time, this is i think the reference that permit to measure the Truth and define the Truth. And in the mathematical Set theory that's the same as logic. Also the reference is important, the reference can be general or it can be relative. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 25 01:17PM -0500 Hello... Read this: What is the essence of democracy ? This is a good subject of philosophy.. And i have to use rationality and some knowledge to answer it and to know and comprehend it. I think the essence of democracy comes from the essence of humanity that is perfection, because our past was full of defectuosities or flaws and inferiorities and it was full of corruption, so we have tried to transcend our living conditions with democracy because the process of democracy is like darwinism , because democracy present to us, we people, different actors and we have to choose the best among them, but democracy is a broader concept that include as a necessity to be more successful the presence of a good media and a good knowledge that help us to optimize best our choice among the actors of democracy, also democracy of today is tuned in such a way that it is founded on the presence of better quality tools that enhance its efficiency and that is in accordance with efficient morality, but do we have to be pessimistic about democracy ? i don't think so, because democracy is better constrained by tools that enhance better its quality, but we have to be careful and to adhere to the way of thinking of efficient morality that i have defined as Performance and reliability. What is the essence of craziness and foolishness ? We have to be smart to answer this question, and like in philosophy we have to be more rigorous.. The essence of craziness and foolishness is related to the essence of laws.. We are setting the laws, but who is setting the laws ? It is efficient morality that must set the laws, and efficient morality can not be craziness and inferiority of nazism, because being nazism is being crazy, because the essence of laws is the essence of efficient morality, and we can not necessarely authorize nazism or neo-nazism to govern, because of all my previous proofs, and you have noticed that i have defined craziness and foolishness that is related to corrruption of morality, here it is again: It is like when we are asking the questions of: What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ? I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality. How it can measure it? Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness. How can we measure the level and degree of quality ? It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way. I give you an example.. If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this corruption of morality. Please read the rest of my final post: What is the essence of philosophy ? I will ask a question: Are you feeling my writing ? What are you feeling ? You will notice that i am abstracting to the essentials, and i am also knowing the essence of different things to be able to know and to comprehend, this is also the goal of philosophy, philosophy uses mostly "rationality" and some "knowledge" to be able to know and to comprehend like science. This is what we call philosophy. I have just corrected some of my typos, and here is my final corrected post about some of my views about my political philosophy: What is the essence of abstraction ? It is a good question in philosophy.. I think the essence of abstraction is that we are also abstracting to be able to conceptualize, abstraction is abstracting to the essentials, it is like abstracting to the priorities, because also you have to prioritize to be able to succeed, for example i am a more serious programmer, and when you are doing the conception in computer programming, you are calling the process of abstraction to be able to conceptualize, and the process of abstraction do help us also to agree on the fondamentals of efficient morality to be able to transcend our living conditions, because what is also the goal of efficient morality today? it is also to abstract to the fondamentals or to the essentials that permit us to transcend nationalism, because we have to be frank that nationalism is not well tuned to be capable of governing the world, this is why you have to transcend with an efficient morality that is capable of governing our world, because our world needs it, because we have to be smarter than past ideologies and be capable to manage ourselves and manage and govern our world. About an important fact about the essence of communism You have to know more communism to talk about it, and to know communism you must know more philosophy and political philosophy, i mean that you have to be capable of thinking like in philosophy, but what is the essence of philosophy? what is the goal of philosophy ? the goal of real philosophy is like the goal of science, science is also to know and to comprehend about the essence of the parts of our intellectual world and empirical world, the goal of real philosophy is also to know and to comprehend, so it has the same essence as science.. i mean you can not set the standard of quality of philosophy as just simply talking , i mean the standard of quality of philosophy must be much higher, this is why the goal of philosophy has to be also like science: to know and to comprehend ! so now ladies and gentlemen, what is the essence of communism? i think one of the most important charcteristic of communism is also that it has tried to transcend nationalism towards a better world, because nationalism is more inferior thinking that is not as capable as efficient morality to transcend our living conditions towards a better world, this is why efficient morality comes to the rescue and dictates to maximize performance and to maximize reliability, and to do so, you can not be inferior thinking of nazism that maximizes efficiency without taking into account correctly guidance of moral that is inherent to almost all of us and that doesn't take into account reliability correctly because it is too much violence that is too extreme in maximizing efficiency. Please read the rest to understand better my views on what must be efficient morality: Futility of nazism and neo-nazism.. Nazism and neo-nazism are childish in that they want violently to maximize efficiency, this is the essence of nazism , it wants also to maximize efficiency even using violence, so we can not be confident with nazism and neo-nazism because they are like childish ideologies because they are not thought correctly. You have to know about efficient morality, i have said that efficient morality is performance and reliability, and morality is composed of a priori pure moral inferred from reason and empirical moral inferred from experience, but that's not so efficient because we have to include what i called "guidance of moral": like happiness and tolerance that is inherent to almost all of us, i think that this guidance of moral is a prerequisite to counter nazism and neo-nazism, because nazism says to maximize efficiency even with violence, but since guidance of moral that is inherent to us and a priori pure moral that takes into account reliability says that this act of nazism that maximize efficiency even with violence that it is an extremism that is too violent, because reliability sees this act of nazism as being too violent that causes violence, and guidance of moral that is inherent to almost all of us sees this act of nazism as being not acceptable , so nazism and neo-nazism is out of question and they are not accepted by efficient morality. Read the rest to understand more: The essence of Nazism.. So what is the essence of Nazism ? When we become smart we have to find the shortest path to the solution, here it is: Nazism is also racism, but this racism of nazism is a violent racism that maximizes efficiency, and this racism that maximizes efficiency is a racism towards others that are not us, and it is a violent racism towards us, this is why nazism has tried to exterminate handicaped people, but you have to be careful with nazism because it tries also to exterminate the weak members to maximize efficiency, this is inherent to nazism, so imagine that we are attaining general artificial intelligence, so nazism can say by maximizing efficiency to exterminate humans that are not needed for a best efficiency, this is why nazism or neo-nazism is violent and dangerous. The essence of communism Communism has thought itself to be a correct morality, but that was the past, And this past has the characteristic of intellectual inferiority inherent to it, so all in all we have to be conscious about it and we have to be more responsability towards morality, am i a communist by saying so ? no, i want to be efficient morality, and efficient morality is a set that includes many disciplines such as politics, morality has to be defined more clearly and more precisely, if we define morality as being just the principles etc. and not including the application of those principles as a necessity, we are falling short and we are not defining morality correctly, because we have to enlarge our view of morality and it has to be defined as an efficient morality that knows how to govern and that knows best, and to know how to govern and to know best you have to set the standard of quality of morality at a higher level , and it is then now clear that a higher standard of morality has to include a higher level of quality of rationality and logical reasoning and has to include science and technical fields as a prerequisite to be able to make morality an efficient morality, so then can we call also this high level of quality such as science and technical fields as part of efficient morality? i think yes because applying efficient morality needs science and technical fields , so because it needs them, so science and technical fields are part of the set of efficient morality, and talking about efficient morality i have said the following: I have defined efficient morality as being: Performance and reliability. But is it a correct definition? Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not reliable, this is why i have said that efficient morality is Performance and reliability. Please read the rest of my post to understand better: I will get into political philosophy.. Here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's related to the general morality.. I will first remember you about my last writing about the essence of humanity: And what is the essence of humanity ? This is a good question in political philosophy. When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important ingredients ? I think the ingredients are: Perfection and Strongness. The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are becoming more organized and less disorganized. This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection. And this brings also hope. I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity is perfection. Am i stupid to say that ? If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with "nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better survive etc. So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's "perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection. Now here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's related to the general morality: Now i have explained that the essence of humanity is "Perfection" and also Strongness, and perfection and strongness is also the essence of a group, because we are also grouping together into different groups to be more perfection and more strong, but this essence of humanity that is Perfection and strongness must adhere to the general morality that must be an efficient morality, but if it is not in accordance with the general morality, we must enforce also general morality by laws, it is why we are managing our societies by laws. But what is also an efficient morality ? About the essence of communism You have not to fear communism, because empirical moral does constrain it, it is like a general mathematical proof, communism must adhere to optimization , because optimization is efficient morality, and efficient morality is Liberty, and corruption of morality must be measured by optimization itself that knows how to be optimization, communism is finally being more conscious of itself, because it is also more conscious of empirical moral. What is the essence of philosophy ? It is a very important question: So we have to be smartness to answer this question: Efficient morality is optimization and it is Liberty. Philosophy is a magical word , like Liberty. It is a generalization, it is like a general mathematical proof, this is the essence of philosophy, philosophy must be efficient morality, because it is a generalization, the word Philosophy is like the King, it must adhere to the act of optimization, and optimization is performance and reliability, now the essence of philosophy is more clear and it shows that the essence of Beauty and the essence of Happiness are the same , they are generalizations that |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment