Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 11 topics

Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 09:00PM -0500

Hello.....
 
Read this:
 
 
My proof of: Can we travel back in time?
 
I wrote before that:
 
"I have asked myself: does an idea exist ?
I think this question is really important..
I think i have to continu to prove it..
I will ask for example does a concept exist ?
Is a concept matter ?
I think that we have to distinguish between a concept and
the reality..
A concept is not the reality, because a concept is a construction
of our brain, and this construction of a concept doesn't become old
when we become really old, and this concept can escape time,
in that you can have a platonic experience of the future of someone
else as i have explained in my previous post, and this platonic
experience escape time , i mean you can travel in the future of someone
else platonically using ideas, and i have explained it to you, so this
platonic world of ideas defy time and can escape time, so this
characteristics of an idea do distinguish ideas from the empirical world
that can not escape time, so this is why we can say there is two worlds,
like the world of the spirit and the world of empirical world, this is
like an approximation that can be utilized to distinguish between the
two worlds by calling them the world of ideas and the empirical world,
this is why i have said the following, because we can travel in the
future of someone else using ideas by escaping time"
 
Here is my other proof, please read it carefully:
 
Can we travel back in time?
 
It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
and logical thinking to answer it ...
 
To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the
mathematical arithmetic series.
 
An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have to
be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the final
calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic series,
the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much bigger time
to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2 has
been reached, the time for the resolution of the arithmetic series has
greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding the resolution has
compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the future quickly, the
resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2),
it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to time travel in the
future more quickly, but understand with me that the time travel in the
future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is
relative to the time taken previously by the arithmetic series just before
the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), and thus that the
universe is computable and that ultimately it allowed a time travel and
thanks to mathematics that is something extra-ordinary in itself.
 
Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:
 
Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the
future time in which one arrives by the feet?
 
I answer this in a more logical way:
 
Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine
that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that also
predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper without
this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result that is
predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes to
theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this
mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), it
is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet invented or
used this equation and who will arrive there in its future, therefore it
is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel machine that
permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive characteristic.
 
So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.
 
Here is one of my conclusion:
 
If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
to swim and walk to Paris and give him
the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the
future,
so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to
travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other mathematical
inventions and others...
 
 
Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into
account the scientific and empirical evidence to
be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the
future..
 
If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his
life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows
him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person will
receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person will be
able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person which will be
the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice , and not only
the first person will have lived the future of the second person before
the second person, since the two will have lived the same event by the
execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we must reason as in
fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
The future of the second person and will also live the future event of the
second person, then those two theoretical and
empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by
mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the
future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy logic
rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact that the
first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second person, this
informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our way of
perceiving, for this certainty, even if
it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel
in the future.
 
Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as a
platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time machine
that permits to travel in the future, you understand that it makes us
live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also Platonist, I
affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold
on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable
advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future.
 
When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the
circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof that
I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is reified by
our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence. So this in my
opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because we feel it by our
reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher Plato.
 
It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to
call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the
future.
 
Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a
time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that
valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future,
and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because the
approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in fuzzy
logic.
 
What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?
 
In my opinion the most important aim of my political philosophy is that
as I have just explained that the idea in the Platonic sense has a very
important characteristic, it is that one can perfect it and bring it to be
more and more perfect or even perfect, then in my opinion the aim of my
political philosophy it is to perfect ideas and to make them follow by the
people, not only that, but these architectural and efficient and correct
ideas of my political philosophy should be regarded as automata that
should be executed to arrive at there efficient goals, now a question
arises from it: how to encourage the people to execute these architectural
ideas as executing automata to perfect more our world ? One of the ways to
do this is what I have done in my political philosophy is to show that
rationality and science and microprocessors and valuable advices etc. etc.
are also as time machines that permit to travel in the future , that is
the architectural ideas of my political philosophy and this architectural
ideas of my political philosophy leads the people to perceive the world
differently by giving for example more importance and high priority to
science and efficient technics and technology, the other method is also to
reinforce more these architectural ideas of my politicial philosophy to be
able to enhance and perfect, as we are enforcing laws..
 
 
Now about a philosophical problem..
 
I have explained with 2 + 2 = 4 that the "consciousness"
is the "consequence" of "understanding", then once
that you build a hierarchy of ideas and
Logical relations and by also measure, then you will be able to understand
mathematical equality Of 2 + 2 = 4, and once you understand that, at this
very precise moment that you understand mathematical equality 2 + 2 = 4,
then you will be ultimately conscious
Of the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4, that is why I have said that
the process of consciousness is much simpler than the process of
intelligence in action, so I hope that my argumentation is clear. Now
there remains something to be explained is that even if the process of
intelligence in action has not been easy for humanity, the fact that a
human being understands the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4, then this
understanding will greatly reduce complexity and let us see the "truth" as
it really is, a child who tries initially to understand the the
mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 will see this process as being
"difficult", but is that really "truth"? I do not believe because the
understanding of the essence of what is "truth" tells us that truth can
only be reached when there is complete comprehension of a process or a
thing, then the perception of the child who sees in the beginning of the
process of understanding the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 as being
"difficult" is not the truth, it is rather the perception of the one who
understood "completely" the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 and which
tells us that equality is easy which is the truth.
 
I have spoken of the understanding of the very essence of what is
the truth, for example, when you look at the door of a car, can you say
that it's a car ? I do not think, it's who looks and understands
everything that is Car that can say it's a car! do you understand ?
Then, in my opinion, it can be inferred that it is understanding of a
process or thing that greatly reduce or erase "complexity" and which
reveals to us the truth, It is like this for the mathematical equality of
2 + 2 = 4 If a child in the beginning tries to understand this equality,
he will say that the mathematical equality is "difficult", but is that the
truth? I think no, because it's like the example of the car which I have
just given you, it is once the understanding
of equality is complete that it will greatly reduce or erase the
"complexity" and will confirm that the equality is truly "easy", and
This is the truth and that is the veridic perception and this is the very
essence of truth.
 
So if you have understood what I'm trying to explain,
Is that we could say that mathematics is easy and simple, our universe is
easy and simple and any thing or process is easy and simple,
But it is because we are limited intellectually or physically that we do
not understand it, i see this as in an axis of reality, i mean that the
complexity of mathematics and knowledge of mathematics is 0.1
on a scale of 100, and we are still weaker at 0.001 on a scale of 100 ,
even though knowledge of the universe and mathematics is easy, we feel
this as difficult.
 
But my point of view is not complete, I will present my other reasoning:
 
We can say, for example, that to define what a car is, we have
to "understand" what a car is, then we
can therefore affirm that the completeness of knowledge
of the car brings us to understand in a perfect way
what is a car .. now the important question in logic is: is it possible to
state the same thing about the variable of the "complexity" of
comprehension, that is to say: perfect knowledge leads us to understand
the very nature of the complexity of knowledge, as in the case of the car i
have just given you above, because it is the one who really knows the car
who can define the car, can we say the same thing about the complexity of
understanding? does it is the one who really knows knowledge that can say
what is the complexity of the understanding of
this knowledge? Do you understand my problem that
use logic effectively to solve this problem?
As in the problem of the car, above, what can we
say about the heaviness or the size of the car which characterizes
the car, we can say that it is the one who has knowledge about the car and
who understands the car that can accurately state what the heaviness or
the size of the car, but can we say the same thing about the
characteristic which is called the "Complexity" of understanding? I mean
that by analogy, if complexity is the characteristic of the
size of the car and if comprehension is the understanding of the car, can
we say the same thing and say that the completeness of understanding can
be defined only when there is more complete understanding and that greatly
reduce or erase complexity because when you understand more fully this
leads us to say that understanding is easy? I think that to solve this
problem it is necessary to look that in
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 08:23PM -0500

Hello..
 
I correct my typos, read again
 
About platonism
 
I have asked myself: does an idea exist ?
 
I think this question is really important..
 
I think i have to continu to prove it..
 
I will ask for example does a concept exist ?
 
Is a concept matter ?
 
I think that we have to distinguish between a concept and
the reality..
 
A concept is not the reality, because a concept is a construction
of our brain, and this construction of a concept doesn't become old
when we become really old, and this concept can escape time,
in that you can have a platonic experience of the future of someone
else as i have explained in my previous post, and this platonic
experience escape time , i mean you can travel in the future of someone
else platonically using ideas, and i have explained it to you, so this
platonic world of ideas defy time and can escape time, so this
characteristics of an idea do distinguish ideas from the empirical world
that can not escape time, so this is why we can say there is two worlds,
like the world of the spirit and the world of empirical world, this is
like an approximation that can be utilized to distinguish between the
two worlds by calling them the world of ideas and the empirical world,
this is why i have said the following, because we can travel in the
future of someone else using ideas by escaping time:
 
Here is my final and perfected post about: What is the essence of
artificial intelligence ?
 
What is the essence of artificial intelligence ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy..
 
How can we answer this question?
 
I will use my smartness to find the shortest path to the solution of
the above question..
 
I think it looks like the question of what is the essence of an idea
in a platonic world.
 
I am a platonist also that think that the idea exist..
 
But it is not sufficient to affirm it, because we have to prove it.
 
To prove it, i will ask why our ideas don't become old as our body
become old? so even if we become really old , our ideas don't become
old, also when you see a circle in the empirical world
you will keep the circle in your memory and imagine or recreate the
circle with your brain from your memory and your consciousness, this is
what makes us feel that a platonic world exist, because the circle that
we imagine or create with our brain doesn't exist in reality, this
circle in our brain is like ideas that don't become old and that are not
real in the empirical world, so this circle in our brain is also ideas
that belong to the platonic world and i think this prove that the world
of ideas exist.
 
In artificial intelligence it is the same, artificial intelligence
is also like ideas, but what is the essence of those ideas? and i have
defined the essence as being:
 
The essence is the basic, real, and invariable nature of a thing or its
significant individual feature or features, like saying: Freedom is the
very essence of our democracy.
 
So what is the essence of those ideas of artificial intelligence? or
what is the essence of an idea ? i think that an idea doesn't become old
like a human and an idea doesn't suffer like a human and an idea also
can be perfected and become
perfect and i think that it can be perfected better than the process of
perfecting the empirical world.
 
So this is the essence of artificial intelligence , it is like the essence
of an idea.
 
Also Artificial intelligence is constrained by the hardware on where you
run the software (or the ideas), so that it inherit the essence of
the hardware(like the computers etc.), so since the hardware doesn't
become old as the body of a human, and since the hardware doesn't
suffer like the body of human, so artificial intelligence inherit
also the essence of the hardware (like the computers etc.), so
general morality become more clear in that since the hardware and
the software (or the ideas) don't suffer like humans and don't
become old like humans , so we have to give more priority to
humans than artificial intelligence , since we have to minimize at best
suffering of humans in our general morality.
 
Yet into philosophy and political philosophy..
 
I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.
 
Am i stupid to say that ?
 
If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.
 
So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.
 
So you have now understood me more, so please read the rest to
understand more:
 
 
What is the essence of peace ?
 
In philosophy you have not to answer this question by individualistic
morality , but by the reference that is general morality and relatively
to general morality, because strict individualistic morality is
inferiority, because of the fact that general morality knows better
about general morality and because general morality is constrained by
the essence of humanity and by the essence of human being, so it must
minimize at best evil by being all the time more perfection that knows
how to escape from weakness and from inferiority and from evil that hurt
the system, but you have also to be aware that general morality is also
constrained by empirical moral that must know how to be compassion and
respect and enough confidence to not hurt the system, so the essence of
peace is general morality that knows how to be an optimized general
morality that is always seeking to be better and that is always seeking
to minimize evil at best. Now that you know more about the essence of
peace, please read the rest of my post about the essence of evil and the
essence of humanity:
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 08:18PM -0500

Hello...
 
 
About platonism
 
I have asked myself: does an idea exist ?
 
I think this question is really important..
 
I think i have to continu to prove it..
 
I will ask for example does a concept exist ?
 
Is a concept matter ?
 
I think that we have to distinguish between a concept and
the reality..
 
A concept is not the reality, because a concept is a construction
of our brain, and this construction of a concept doesn't become old
when we become really old, and this concept can escape time,
in that you can have a platonic experience of the future of someone
else as i have explained in my previous post, and this platonic
experience escape time , i mean you can travel in the future of someone
else platonically using ideas, and i have explained it to you, so this
platonic world of ideas defy time and can escape time, so this
characteristics of an idea do distinguish ideas from the empirical world
that can not escape time, so this is why we can say there is two worlds,
like the world of the spirit and the world of empirical world, this is
like an approximation that can be utilized to distinguish between the
two worlds by calling them the world of ideas and the empirical world,
this is why i have said the following, because we can travel in the
future of someone else using ideas by escaping time:
 
Here is my final and perfected post about: What is the essence of
artificial intelligence ?
 
What is the essence of artificial intelligence ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy..
 
How can we answer this question?
 
I will use my smartness to find the shortest path to the solution of
the above question..
 
I think it looks like the question of what is the essence of an idea
in a platonic world.
 
I am a platonist also that think that the idea exist..
 
But it is not sufficient to affirm it, because we have to prove it.
 
To prove it, i will ask why our ideas don't become old as our body
become old? so even if we become really old , our ideas don't become
old, also when you see a circle in the empirical world
you will keep the circle in your memory and imagine or recreate the
circle with your brain from your memory and your consciousness, this is
what makes us feel that a platonic world exist, because the circle that
we imagine or create with our brain doesn't exist in reality, this
circle in our brain is like ideas that don't become old and that are not
real in the empirical world, so this circle in our brain is also ideas
that belong to the platonic world and i think this prove that the world
of ideas exist.
 
In artificial intelligence it is the same, artificial intelligence
is also like ideas, but what is the essence of those ideas? and i have
defined the essence as being:
 
The essence is the basic, real, and invariable nature of a thing or its
significant individual feature or features, like saying: Freedom is the
very essence of our democracy.
 
So what is the essence of those ideas of artificial intelligence? or
what is the essence of an idea ? i think that an idea doesn't become old
like a human and an idea doesn't suffer like a human and an idea also
can be perfected and become
perfect and i think that it can be perfected better than the process of
perfecting the empirical world.
 
So this is the essence of artificial intelligence , it is like the essence
of an idea.
 
Also Artificial intelligence is constrained by the hardware on where you
run the software (or the ideas), so that it inherit the essence of
the hardware(like the computers etc.), so since the hardware doesn't
become old as the body of a human, and since the hardware doesn't
suffer like the body of human, so artificial intelligence inherit
also the essence of the hardware (like the computers etc.), so
general morality become more clear in that since the hardware and
the software (or the ideas) don't suffer like humans and don't
become old like humans , so we have to give more priority to
humans than artificial intelligence , since we have to minimize at best
suffering of humans in our general morality.
 
Yet into philosophy and political philosophy..
 
I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.
 
Am i stupid to say that ?
 
If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.
 
So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.
 
So you have now understood me more, so please read the rest to
understand more:
 
 
What is the essence of peace ?
 
In philosophy you have not to answer this question by individualistic
morality , but by the reference that is general morality and relatively
to general morality, because strict individualistic morality is
inferiority, because of the fact that general morality knows better
about general morality and because general morality is constrained by
the essence of humanity and by the essence of human being, so it must
minimize at best evil by being all the time more perfection that knows
how to escape from weakness and from inferiority and from evil that hurt
the system, but you have also to be aware that general morality is also
constrained by empirical moral that must know how to be compassion and
respect and enough confidence to not hurt the system, so the essence of
peace is general morality that knows how to be an optimized general
morality that is always seeking to be better and that is always seeking
to minimize evil at best. Now that you know more about the essence of
peace, please read the rest of my post about the essence of evil and the
essence of humanity:
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 07:28PM -0500

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
Sorry, i have just perfected more my post, here is again my post:
 
Here is my final and perfected post about: What is the essence of
artificial intelligence ?
 
What is the essence of artificial intelligence ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy..
 
How can we answer this question?
 
I will use my smartness to find the shortest path to the solution of
the above question..
 
I think it looks like the question of what is the essence of an idea
in a platonic world.
 
I am a platonist also that think that the idea exist..
 
But it is not sufficient to affirm it, because we have to prove it.
 
To prove it, i will ask why our ideas don't become old as our body
become old? so even if we become really old , our ideas don't become
old, also when you see a circle in the empirical world
you will keep the circle in your memory and imagine or recreate the
circle with your brain from your memory and your consciousness, this is
what makes us feel that a platonic world exist, because the circle that
we imagine or create with our brain doesn't exist in reality, this
circle in our brain is like ideas that don't become old and that are not
real in the empirical world, so this circle in our brain is also ideas
that belong to the platonic world and i think this prove that the world
of ideas exist.
 
In artificial intelligence it is the same, artificial intelligence
is also like ideas, but what is the essence of those ideas? and i have
defined the essence as being:
 
The essence is the basic, real, and invariable nature of a thing or its
significant individual feature or features, like saying: Freedom is the
very essence of our democracy.
 
So what is the essence of those ideas of artificial intelligence? or
what is the essence of an idea ? i think that an idea doesn't become old
like a human and an idea doesn't suffer like a human and an idea also
can be perfected and become
perfect and i think that it can be perfected better than the process of
perfecting the empirical world.
 
So this is the essence of artificial intelligence , it is like the essence
of an idea.
 
Also Artificial intelligence is constrained by the hardware on where you
run the software (or the ideas), so that it inherit the essence of
the hardware(like the computers etc.), so since the hardware doesn't
become old as the body of a human, and since the hardware doesn't
suffer like the body of human, so artificial intelligence inherit
also the essence of the hardware (like the computers etc.), so
general morality become more clear in that since the hardware and
the software (or the ideas) don't suffer like humans and don't
become old like humans , so we have to give more priority to
humans than artificial intelligence , since we have to minimize at best
suffering of humans in our general morality.
 
Yet into philosophy and political philosophy..
 
I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.
 
Am i stupid to say that ?
 
If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.
 
So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.
 
So you have now understood me more, so please read the rest to
understand more:
 
 
What is the essence of peace ?
 
In philosophy you have not to answer this question by individualistic
morality , but by the reference that is general morality and relatively
to general morality, because strict individualistic morality is
inferiority, because of the fact that general morality knows better
about general morality and because general morality is constrained by
the essence of humanity and by the essence of human being, so it must
minimize at best evil by being all the time more perfection that knows
how to escape from weakness and from inferiority and from evil that hurt
the system, but you have also to be aware that general morality is also
constrained by empirical moral that must know how to be compassion and
respect and enough confidence to not hurt the system, so the essence of
peace is general morality that knows how to be an optimized general
morality that is always seeking to be better and that is always seeking
to minimize evil at best. Now that you know more about the essence of
peace, please read the rest of my post about the essence of evil and the
essence of humanity:
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 07:17PM -0500

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
I correct some typos, here is my final post about: What is the essence
of artificial intelligence ?
 
What is the essence of artificial intelligence ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy..
 
How can we answer this question?
 
I will use my smartness to find the shortest path to the solution of
the above question..
 
I think it looks like the question of what is the essence of an idea
in a platonic world.
 
I am a platonist also that think that the idea exist..
 
But it is not sufficient to affirm it, because we have to prove it.
 
To prove it, i will ask why our ideas don't become old as our body
become old? so even if we become really old , our ideas don't become
old, also when you see a circle in the empirical world
you will keep the circle in your memory and imagine or recreate the
circle with your brain from your memory and your consciousness, this is
what makes us feel that a platonic world exist, because the circle that
we imagine or create with our brain doesn't exist in reality, this
circle in our brain is like ideas that don't become old and that are not
real in the empiric world, so this circle in our brain is also ideas
that belong to the platonic world and i think this prove that the world
of ideas exist.
 
In artificial intelligence it is the same, artificial intelligence
is also like ideas, but what is the essence of those ideas? and i have
defined the essence as being:
 
The essence is the basic, real, and invariable nature of a thing or its
significant individual feature or features, like saying: Freedom is the
very essence of our democracy.
 
So what is the essence of those ideas of artificial intelligence? or
what is the essence of an idea ? i think that an idea doesn't become old
like a human and an idea doesn't suffer like a human and an idea also
can be perfected and become
perfect and i think that it can be perfected better than the process of
perfecting the empiric world.
 
So this is the essence of artificial intelligence , it like the essence
of an idea.
 
Also Artificial intelligence is constrained by the hardware on where you
run the software (or the ideas), so that it inherit the essence of
the hardware(like the computers etc.), so since the hardware doesn't
become old as the body of a human, and since the hardware doesn't
suffer like the body of human, so artificial intelligence inherit
also the essence of the hardware (like the computers etc.), so
general morality become more clear in that since the hardware and
the software (or the ideas) don't suffer like humans and don't
become old like humans , so we have to give more priority to
humans than artificial intelligence , since we have to minimize at best
suffering of humans in our general morality.
 
Yet into philosophy and political philosophy..
 
I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.
 
Am i stupid to say that ?
 
If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.
 
So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.
 
So you have now understood me more, so please read the rest to
understand more:
 
 
What is the essence of peace ?
 
In philosophy you have not to answer this question by individualistic
morality , but by the reference that is general morality and relatively
to general morality, because strict individualistic morality is
inferiority, because of the fact that general morality knows better
about general morality and because general morality is constrained by
the essence of humanity and by the essence of human being, so it must
minimize at best evil by being all the time more perfection that knows
how to escape from weakness and from inferiority and from evil that hurt
the system, but you have also to be aware that general morality is also
constrained by empirical moral that must know how to be compassion and
respect and enough confidence to not hurt the system, so the essence of
peace is general morality that knows how to be an optimized general
morality that is always seeking to be better and that is always seeking
to minimize evil at best. Now that you know more about the essence of
peace, please read the rest of my post about the essence of evil and the
essence of humanity:
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 07:06PM -0500

Hello.....
 
Read this:
 
 
What is the essence of artificial intelligence ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy..
 
How can we answer this question?
 
I will use my smartness to find the shortest path to the solution of
the above question..
 
I think it look like the question of what is the essence of an idea
in a platonic world.
 
I am a platonist also that think that the idea exist..
 
But it is not sufficient to affirm it, because we have to prove it.
 
To prove it, i will ask why our ideas doesn't become old as our body
become old? so even if we become really old , our ideas don't become
old, also when you see a circle in the empiric world
you will keep the circle in your memory and imagine or recreate the
circle with your brain from your memory and your consciousness, this is
what makes us feel that a platonic world exist, because the circle that
we imagine or create with our brain doesn't exist in reality, this
circle in our brain is like ideas that don't become old and that are not
real in the empiric world, so this circle in our brain is also ideas
that belong to the platonic world and i think this prove that the world
of ideas exist.
 
In artificial intelligence it is the same, artificial intelligence
is also like ideas, but what is the essence of those ideas? and i have
defined the essence as being:
 
The essence is the basic, real, and invariable nature of a thing or its
significant individual feature or features, like saying: Freedom is the
very essence of our democracy.
 
So what is the essence of those ideas of artificial intelligence? or
what is the essence of an idea ? i think that an idea doesn't become old
like a human and an idea doesn't suffer like a human and an idea also
can be perfected and become
perfect and i think that it can be perfected better than the process of
perfecting the empiric world.
 
So this is the essence of artificial intelligence , it like the essence
of an idea.
 
Also Artificial intelligence is constrained by the hardware on where you
run the software (or the ideas), so that it inherit the essence of
the hardware(like the computers etc.), so since the hardware doesn't
become old as the body of a human, and since the hardware doesn't
suffer like the body of human, so artificial intelligence inherit
also the essence of the hardware (like the computers etc.), so
general morality become more clear in that since the hardware and
the software (or the ideas) don't suffer like humans and don't
become old like humans , so we have to give more priority to
humans than artificial intelligence , since we have minimize at best
suffering of humans in our general morality.
 
Yet into philosophy and political philosophy..
 
I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.
 
Am i stupid to say that ?
 
If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.
 
So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.
 
So you have now understood me more, so please read the rest to
understand more:
 
 
What is the essence of peace ?
 
In philosophy you have not to answer this question by individualistic
morality , but by the reference that is general morality and relatively
to general morality, because strict individualistic morality is
inferiority, because of the fact that general morality knows better
about general morality and because general morality is constrained by
the essence of humanity and by the essence of human being, so it must
minimize at best evil by being all the time more perfection that knows
how to escape from weakness and from inferiority and from evil that hurt
the system, but you have also to be aware that general morality is also
constrained by empirical moral that must know how to be compassion and
respect and enough confidence to not hurt the system, so the essence of
peace is general morality that knows how to be an optimized general
morality that is always seeking to be better and that is always seeking
to minimize evil at best. Now that you know more about the essence of
peace, please read the rest of my post about the essence of evil and the
essence of humanity:
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 05:50PM -0500

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
I have to define what is an essence also, here is how:
 
The essence is the basic, real, and invariable nature of a thing or its
significant individual feature or features, like saying: Freedom is the
very essence of our democracy.
 
Yet into philosophy and political philosophy..
 
I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.
 
Am i stupid to say that ?
 
If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.
 
So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.
 
So you have now understood me more, so please read the rest to
understand more:
 
 
What is the essence of peace ?
 
In philosophy you have not to answer this question by individualistic
morality , but by the reference that is general morality and relatively
to general morality, because strict individualistic morality is
inferiority, because of the fact that general morality knows better
about general morality and because general morality is constrained by
the essence of humanity and by the essence of human being, so it must
minimize at best evil by being all the time more perfection that knows
how to escape from weakness and from inferiority and from evil that hurt
the system, but you have also to be aware that general morality is also
constrained by empirical moral that must know how to be compassion and
respect and enough confidence to not hurt the system, so the essence of
peace is general morality that knows how to be an optimized general
morality that is always seeking to be better and that is always seeking
to minimize evil at best. Now that you know more about the essence of
peace, please read the rest of my post about the essence of evil and the
essence of humanity:
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 05:24PM -0500

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
Yet into philosophy and political philosophy..
 
I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.
 
Am i stupid to say that ?
 
If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.
 
So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.
 
So you have now understood me more, so please read the rest to
understand more:
 
 
What is the essence of peace ?
 
In philosophy you have not to answer this question by individualistic
morality , but by the reference that is general morality and relatively
to general morality, because strict individualistic morality is
inferiority, because of the fact that general morality knows better
about general morality and because general morality is constrained by
the essence of humanity and by the essence of human being, so it must
minimize at best evil by being all the time more perfection that knows
how to escape from weakness and from inferiority and from evil that hurt
the system, but you have also to be aware that general morality is also
constrained by empirical moral that must know how to be compassion and
respect and enough confidence to not hurt the system, so the essence of
peace is general morality that knows how to be an optimized general
morality that is always seeking to be better and that is always seeking
to minimize evil at best. Now that you know more about the essence of
peace, please read the rest of my post about the essence of evil and the
essence of humanity:
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 04:11PM -0500

Hello....
 
 
What is the essence of peace ?
 
In philosophy you have not to answer this question by individualistic
morality , but by the reference that is general morality and relatively
to general morality, because strict individualistic morality is
inferiority, because of the fact that general morality knows better
about general morality and because general morality is constrained by
the essence of humanity and by the essence of human being, so it must
minimize at best evil by being all the time more perfection that knows
how to escape from weakness and inferiority and from evil that hurt the
system, but you have also to be aware that general morality is also
constrained by empirical moral that must know how to be compassion and
respect and enough confidence to not hurt the system, so the essence of
peace is general morality that knows how to be an optimized general
morality that is always seeking to be better and that is always seeking
to minimize evil at best. Now that you know more about the essence of
peace, please read the rest of post about the essence of evil and the
essence of humanity:
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 03:31PM -0500

Hello,
 
Read This:
 
 
The essence of a human..
 
What is the essence of a human being ?
 
It's like in philosophy and political philosophy, you have to be more
smart to answer this question..
 
So my smartness has to find the shortest path to the solution of the
above question..
 
The essence of a human comes from the essence of humanity, the essence
of humanity is perfection that wants also to be strong to be able to
survive, so this is why i have said that the essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, please read bellow my post to understand
more, so we can not content ourselves with "nothing" to be able to
survive, thus this "nothing" must evolve in being able to "walk" to find
food, and to evolve in being able to run faster to be able to be
perfection that is capable of being quality that transcend our living
condition towards a better life and a better world and a better future.
This is the essence of a human being, please read the rest of my post
about the essence of evil and the essence of humanity:
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Jan 15 03:01PM -0500

Hello,
 
Read this:
 
 
Here is my final extended post on the essence of humanity and the
essence of evil..
 
We have to be smarter..
 
I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature
 
So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined
relatively to the general morality of the group.
 
And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..
 
What is the essence of evil ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..
 
So you have to be smart to answer this question..
 
The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness,
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.
 
Here comes again an interesting subject..
 
I will start it by a question:
 
Above you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't
hurt the others as not an evil ?
 
This is a smart question..
 
I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others
as evil.
 
And what is the essence of humanity ?
 
This is a good question in political philosophy.
 
When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important
ingredients ?
 
I think the ingredients are:
 
Perfection and Strongness.
 
The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.
 
 
This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.
 
 
And this brings also hope.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)