| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 25 11:31AM -0800 Hello.. More political philosophy about how to manage complexity and more.. In software engineering you can by good code refactoring manage efficiently "complexity", since potential advantages of code refactoring may include improved code readability and reduced complexity; these can improve the source code's maintainability and create a simpler, cleaner, or more expressive internal architecture or object model to improve extensibility. But to know more about how to manage complexity, i invite you to read the following very interesting article: Learning to Live with Complexity https://hbr.org/2011/09/learning-to-live-with-complexity Now more political philosophy about specialization and survival.. Look at the following video of DINOSAURS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIX_Pr9ufR8 So what are you noticing ? So if you are smart you will quickly notice that DINOSAURS have not survived since they were too specialized ! so now you are understanding one of the most important rule in political philosophy and it is that you have to know that being good at adaptability is also knowing how to not be too specialized ! I give you a quick example: Today you have to know how to diversify economy so that to be good at adaptability, and this diversification is also not being too specialized ! (read below my thoughts about Colombia that wanted and is wanting to diversify its economy so that to be much more efficient and much better at adaptability) I give you another example about being too specialized: Also lack of decentralization is also being too specialized, this is why i said about nationalism the following: I think that nationalism is also like too much "centralization", since this too much centralization of nationalism is like a too much monopolize that also hurts quality, and also i think nationalism is too much competition that lacks collaboration and this causes that it hurts quality too, but you have to also understand that the tendency of our today world is to decentralize for better efficiency, not to become nationalism, read my following thoughts to notice: Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. I give you another example of being too specialized: So in "philosophy" we have to ask such the following very important question that is: Is working in a higher level of abstraction better than working on a lower level abstraction? I think that civilization has gone and is going forward towards the future by needing from us to also be "specialization", so i think that both the working at the high level of abstraction and at low level of abstraction are specializations, we can easily notice it by noticing that software engineering works at a higher level of abstraction, and i think it is like a specialization, so i think that computer science is much appropriate way of understanding, since computer science works both at a higher level of abstraction and at the lower level of abstraction , because computer science understand the how it is made and how to build it to a higher level of abstraction, so computer science is both working at a higher level of abstraction and working at a lower level of abstraction, so it "generalizes" better and it is better for adaptability. Read more in all my following thoughts to understand better: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/XgEvO1E9kIU More political philosophy about the smart game that we call human life.. Look at the following video from Colombia: Colombia's booming tech scene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxPySfuQO_c So as you are noticing that the spirit of the Colombian person that is speaking in the above video is positive(he is positive like me), so as you are noticing that he is playing at the game of human life that is also to diversify the economy, and he is giving a great importance to tech industry and he is giving a great importance to economic integration with other countries, so as you are noticing it is part of the Global optimization since we have to be this optimization so that to become efficient worldwide, so i think that we have to be optimistic since i think that with the exponential progress of our humanity we will become much much more efficient in the near future of 2030. Tech giants' anticompetitive practices investigation - US lawmakers report their findings "In recent years, each company has expanded and exploited their power of the marketplace in anticompetitive ways." "Our investigation leaves no doubt that there is a clear and compelling need for Congress and the antitrust enforcement agencies to take action that restores competition, improves innovation, and safeguards our democracy." Read more here: https://www.computing.co.uk/news/4021278/tech-giants-anticompetitive-practices-investigation-us-lawmakers-report-findings EU targets big tech with tighter target list and rules I have just read the following article, i invite you to read it: Large platforms are invasive, they pay little tax and they destroy competition. This is not the Internet that we wanted, "said another source with direct knowledge of Brussels plans. EU targets big tech with tighter target list and rules https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.developpez.com%2Factu%2F309621%2FL-UE-vise-les-grandes-technologies-avec-une-liste-cible-et-des-regles-plus-strictes-Bruxelles-elargit-la-recherche-de-pouvoirs-supplementaires-pour-limiter-la-puissance-des-plateformes-numeriques%2F I invite you to read all my following thoughts to understand more: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/XgEvO1E9kIU About my thoughts of my political philosophy.. I just want to say that notice that when you read my thoughts of political philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/gyQROkO_yRo You will notice that the text is not formatted properly in the above link, so what you can do is just go down the page in the above link and click on "forward" to send it to your email and it will be formatted properly when it is sent to your email. You can do the same to my other links inside the above link when they are not formatted properly. More philosophy about my next PDF book about my political philosophy.. As you have just noticed, i have just written the following: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Don't worry, so that to easy the job for you, i have noticed that my thoughts of my political philosophy that i have posted are above 200 pages, so i will soon convert them to a PDF book in english that will be formatted properly, and i will also translate it fast to a PDF book in french that will be formatted properly. And i will put my two PDF books in my website and you will be able to download them and read them. And after that i will translate fast my book to modern arabic(since i am a white arab) and to other languages. I speak and write french and english and arabic. So stay tuned ! --------------------------------------------------------------------- But i think i am smart, so i will provide you with the first version of my book that will be free for downloading and reading. And after that i will enhance my PDF book much more and i will sell it for 9.99$ or 19.99$, but my much more enhanced book will be powerful, since it will be much more inventive and creative, and it will also organize much more efficiently the democratized information on internet. And as you have noticed i have just said the following: More philosophy on how to be successful and rich.. I think that there is not only technology and science where you can make big money and be successful, but you can also become really successful and rich in the area of "abstraction", what i mean is that we are in a era of globalization that is characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, but you have to be smart and notice that the democratization of information is not enough, since the information has to be organized smartly and efficiently, this is where you can become successful and rich by "abstracting" this complexity by organizing the information or the democratized information in such a way that it minimizes efficiently the time to learn and to become efficient, and of course you have to sell this organized information that abstract complexity. And about my new software products and about my books.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I just want to say that i have invented four software products, they are powerful software products, and i think that i will become a Billionaire by selling them. So stay tuned and you will notice that i am not joking, because it is all the truth. But you have to know that i will give almost all the money that i will earn from my above software products to the poors, because i don't need all this money. And here is my next books that i will write and sell: - First book is about parallelism and concurrency, and it will also contain explanation of some of my scalable algorithms and algorithms that i have invented. - Second book is about sophisticated artificial intelligence programming, and it will contain some of my inventions of scalable algorithms that will be used to make it scalable. - Third book is about my efficient methodology of thinking and acting that has permitted me to become smart and successful. And here is how i am becoming very smart: I am also thinking and acting very efficiently like the following artificial intelligence, read the following about it: How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/ So i will write three books that i will sell and on one of my book i will explain my efficient methodology of how i have become successful. So stay tuned ! More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and i think i am a philosopher, so now i will do political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy, first i will start it by asking the following question: Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ? When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also we can logically prove it by saying the following: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical question, and it is the following: Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has: From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and a country can become a more global world like European union or such. More political philosophy about what is the goal of philosophy.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and i think that i am also a philosopher, so now i will talk about an important subject in philosophy and it is: What is the goal of philosophy ? I think there is a difference between doing philosophy like i am doing and the goal of philosophy, and doing philosophy is getting more efficiently into the "details" by being inventive and by more efficiently understanding, but the goal of philosophy is also, first, to know how to be an efficient higher level "abstraction" that abstract complexity so that people do understand efficiently your philosophy, so that people be efficient in this life, and, second, the goal of philosophy is also the following: I have just read the following article: How to Live Better, According to Nietzsche https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/10/nietzsches-guide-to-better-living/568375/ And it says the following: "More recently, in his Philosophical Investigations (1953), Ludwig Wittgenstein suggested that the aim of philosophy is not to seek the truth but rather to provide relief—"to show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle." " I think i am smart and i think i am a philosopher and i am not in accordance with the above saying of Ludwig Wittgenstein, because i think that it is by logical analogy like knowing the difference between boolean logic and fuzzy logic, i mean the goal of philosophy is to seek the truth, but philosophy is like Democracy that gives you a certain level of liberty under the "laws" of the society that permits you to think and write your philosophy and it can be philosophy that is the truth or that is a certain level of truth, so it is like fuzzy logic, since we want to let people in democracy diversify there thinking on philosophy(but they have to respect the laws), and the goal of philosophy is that from this philosophical diversity we have to choose what is the best philosophy. So i will give a good example so that you efficiently understand me, here is the example: Please read my following thoughts about Turing completeness and parallel |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment