- About more philosophy about smartness.. - 1 Update
- And more about my spirit.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 29 11:39AM -0800 Hello, About more philosophy about smartness.. You will think that smartness is much more genetical, but this is a big mistake, since i think i am smart and i will explain: If you want to climb a big mountain, there is two ways: You can climb the big mountain or you can make the big mountain small in height so that to climb it, so when you are smart you will take a look at the constraints that make smartness much less expressive, and those constraints that make smartness much less expressive is like making the mountain small in height so that to climb it. More philosophy about composability.. When you are smart you will realize that you have to know how to "compose" so that to become smart, but before you know how to compose so that to be smart, you have to efficiently being "selective" of and you have to see clearly what you compose so that to be smart, and here again you will notice that being smartly inventive is also a so important thing. This is why i am thinking it smartly, so read about my following spirit so that to understand more: I am a white arab and i think i am smart, but i am also becoming much more smart and much more powerful by using "efficiently" Swarm intelligence, read about it here(and my thoughts below about it): How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/ About my body: I was a sportive guy, so i am like a sportive, and i am around 6 foot tall, and i am not doing sex because sex is an inferior thing for me, i am like sportive and I have a mania for great or grandiose intellectual performance. If you want to know more about my genetical and psychological kind, here it is: I have a mania for great or grandiose performance(especially intellectual performance). And my father was an intellectual Elite that had the same mania as me, and i think it was genetical in him too. And a "mania" is an excitement manifested by mental and physical hyperactivity. I am also genetically capable to be precise and smart. This is also why i am a white arab that is an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I am also genetically a gentleman type of person. And i think i am a wise type of person. More political philosophy about Swarm Intelligence.. Swarm intelligence can make a person much smarter, or it can make us collectively much smarter, so the best way is to know how to use it efficiently, so that also to enhance much more productivity and to enhance much more quality, this is why i am very positive, since we have to be proactive so that to make people much smarter with Swarm intelligence. More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ? So are humans smart ? I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart, since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here: How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/ So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think that you will soon notice it by following the exponential progress of our humanity. More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic.. I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ? First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is going "very" fast, look at the following video to understand it: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic. And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also comes from the following process: How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/ And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress" -- This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress So let us take together this beautiful breakfast This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance -- Also you have to read my following thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about solidarity.. I think i am a philosopher, and you have to read below my thoughts about the problem of absurdity, and you will notice that that i am "abstracting" so that you understand, and i am for example saying: "this smartness of humans gives "hope" and this pleasures of human life gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life", so as you are noticing that solidarity can also be classified as a pleasure of human life among other pleasures of human life that is important and that gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life, so i think that the abstraction is correct. And you have to read my following political philosophy about Morality: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4 And notice that i am saying in the the above web link about Morality the following about solidarity: More about compassion in political philosophy.. And what about compassion and love in political philosophy ? "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it: "When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit." So then compassion and love is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection of my abstraction of morality above, is also helping others, so then a more appropriate morality is to not neglect helping others and to know how to help others. So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping others" But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how: Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand: More political philosophy about Albert Camus and the problem of absurdity.. I am a white arab, and i think i am a philosopher, and now i will talk about an important subject in political philosophy: So read the following article about Albert Camus: Albert Camus and the problem of absurdity https://blog.oup.com/2019/05/albert-camus-problem-absurdity/ So notice that it says: "The philosopher Albert Camus asserts that we should embrace the absurdity of human existence and take on the purpose of creating value and meaning. Efforts and resilience – not suicide and despair – are the appropriate responses." So i think i am smart, and i am noticing that Albert Camus has made a big mistake by saying that human existence was or is absurd, because human existence is inherently not absurd, i can prove it easily by saying the following: Human existence inherently has an interesting purpose and it inherently comes with an interesting value that has a great weight of importance, i mean that human life inherently comes with human smartness that has a great weight of importance and human life comes with pleasures of life, and human life is both "pleasures" of life and a level of suffering, this smartness of humans gives "hope" and this pleasures of human life gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life, so this is why i say that Albert Camus was not right by saying that human existence is absurd. Read my following political philosophy about Morality to know more about my thoughts: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i think i am also a philosopher, and now i will start by asking a philosophical question: Is Democracy morality ? I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive", read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to know that they have to be progressive: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4 And we can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy.. Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ? When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also we can logically prove it by saying the following: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical question, and it is the following: Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has: From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and a country can become a more global world like European union or such. More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy.. I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012: ---- More about China and Russia and other such countries education system.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, read the following: "Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education is no exception," Mr. Li said. A Chinese Education, for a Price Read more here: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i don't think it is meritocratic ! It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it: Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass examinations and obtain a diploma. RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities Read more here: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are. ---- And also i have just posted about the today China after the anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following: --- I invite you to read the following interesting article: China's Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/ --- So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt the education system and when education system is corrupt then the Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press, read my |
| Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Dec 29 08:24PM +0100 > ..., and i am not doing sex because sex is an inferior thing for me, You're so disordered ... |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment