- My wisdom of today.. - 1 Update
- What is the essence of morality ? - 1 Update
- About the essence of political philosophy.. - 1 Update
- Can China build a US$145 million superconducting computer that will change the world? - 1 Update
- More political philosophy.. - 1 Update
| Sky89 <a@a.a>: Aug 31 05:33PM -0700 Hello... Read this: My wisdom of today.. How to be able to be successful ? You have to think bigger ! you have to cease to think smaller ! USA for example wants to think "big" to be able to be succcessful ! And when you start to think bigger and bigger you will start to set correctly the requirements like wanting to think "efficiently" by being more technical and more science and more math and more political philosophy and more operational research etc. This is my way of doing.. So i invite you to listen to this video of this more serious computer programmer like me to understand better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7bG3D8JQig&t=127s Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Sky89 <a@a.a>: Aug 31 04:09PM -0700 Hello,, Read this: I have to do more political philosophy in front of you so that you be able to understand me better, so i will do more political philosophy now, and now about the essence of morality, so i will start it by asking the following question: What is the essence of morality ? You have to understand deeply my thoughts to understand better what is the essence of morality, first you have to be able to define better what is morality, so notice with me that morality can not be called morality if it is not a "decent" morality ! this is the constrain over morality, because if laws(that is morality) are not "decent" laws, so it is "failure" of morality, so the essence of morality is a social contract that sets morality as being a decent morality, because morality is a "set" that contains: the political system and the laws etc. but you have to know how to be not extremist at defining what is a "decent" morality, here again there can be extremism that is too violent, so as you are noticing that the base of the internal political system of USA and China and all the other countries is that it has to be compatible with a decent morality, so as you are noticing the social contract is clear , and now comes the question of: is political correctness a fascism ? here again you have to notice that to be able to be a decent morality you have to know how to be political correctness and symbolism of political correctness, and now you are feeling more the fact that political correctness is part of morality and it is a "necessary" requirement. Read again the rest of my thoughts to understand better: About the essence of political philosophy.. I am a white arab, but i am not a muslim As you have noticed i am not wasting my time with Islam, because Islam is very inefficient as a system and as an economic system, and as you have noticed i am doing more political philosophy here, and why am i doing more political philosophy ? because political philosophy permits us to transcend our living conditions and permits us to be awareness that is more "efficient", so here again you are noticing that i am giving much more importance to efficiency, i give you an example: If i ask you a question of what is the best way to succeed in life ? If you understand the essence of this question, you will understand better the "essence" of political philosophy, because political philosophy is morality that is reliability as i have explained, so since morality is constrained by reliability, thus it must be a decent morality so that to be able to call it morality or reliability, so as you have noticed political correctness and symbolism of political correctness is part of morality, because being political "correctness" is being correctness that is "measured" by morality that has to be maximization at best of reliability and it must be "decent" morality to be able to call it morality so that to not cause desorder and violence inside the system, so as you are noticing political philosophy permits us to be more successful as a system, by doing political philosophy i am discovering the architectural ideas and the steps that permit us to construct a more successful political system, so as you have noticed i have spoken in my political philosophy about: 1- Hierarchy 2- Richness 3- Efficiency 4- And about economy 5- And about morality etc. Read my following thoughts to understand better(And i will post to you my other thoughts of my political philosophy): More political philosophy.. You have seen me talking about USA and about communism.. How do you think people around the world are judging communism and are judging USA ? Philosophically we know that we have the strong and the weak, but if the weak just want to be equal to the strong , is it acceptable by logic ? i don't think so because the weak is also "inefficiency" and he has the "tendency" to be more "corrupt" or more "desorder" ! and from philosophy we can say that "hierarchy" by the the fact that nature and culture wants the strong to be strong and want him to guide people and to give quality and want him to give efficiency ! so from this we can say that this "hierarchy" is allowed by logic ! but political philosophy gives a "great" priority to the fact that we have to know how to "nuance" to be able to judge ! so we have for example to know that USA has its "advantages". This is why i said that: About the essence of USA... USA is meritocracy that has choosen to be "efficiency", and it has allowed the rich to be rich to attract more economic investment and to attract more smart people so that to become rich and to be at the forefront of technology and science. But can we ask ourselves an important question? what will be the world without USA ? this is the important question to ask ! and now you are starting to be "pragmatic" by asking this question ! and now you are starting to see the nuances and be capable of nuancing ! because one of the advantages of USA is that USA is in the forefront of technology and science and it is helping the world to advance in technology and science ! and since USA has become powerful so USA has wanted and wants to play a role of a policeman of the world to bring more order to the world ! so as you have noticed we have to be capable to see the advantages of USA ! this is how we will be capable of nuancing in politics ! And yet more about political philosophy.. And you saw me writing above about "hierarchy", so what about "richness" ? Read all my following thoughts to understand more: Yet more political philosophy about morality.. I said that morality is reliability. And look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is the "state" of being reliable. But there is still a question that remains: Why not say that morality is maximization at best of reliability ? Because if morality can not be viewed as morality because of failure of the system , so this can not be called reliability or morality, so this is why i am approximating with the word reliability, because if we call a system a decent morality that means that it can be called reliability, thus we can not say that morality is maximization at best of reliability because if maximization at best of reliability is not "sufficient" to give "decent" morality, so that's not reliability and that's not morality. Read the rest of my thoughts: I will yet get into more political philosophy.. This time about political correctness and symbolism that is part of political correctness.. You will notice that communism has used also symbolism that is part of political correctness to govern and for example national socialism of Algeria today uses political correctness and "symbolism" of political correctness to govern the people, so what do we have to think about political correctness and about this kind of symbolism that is part of political correctness that is used by such governance? i think that when we say political correctness, as you have noticed this contains the word "correctness", so i think that political correctness is also the way because correctness of political correctness is defined by measuring it by morality that is "reliability", because as i said that the essence of reliability is solving problems and reliability(thus morality) is pushed towards solving all our problems that is absolute reliability or absolute happiness, so correctness of political correctness has to be measured by reliability , this is why when we say that we have to be political correctness this is "logical" and this is a "truth", so from now you are able to understand that being political correctness is part of morality. Read the rest of my thought to understand better: I have to be more smart.. I said that morality is reliability. But look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is the "state" of being reliable, but here again you have to understand the essence of reliability, reliability is a balance of tolerance and efficiency and performance etc. that gives a "maximization" that we can call reliability, so here again you are feeling the essence of morality that is reliability, and i am choosing to say that morality is reliability to show a more correct "abstraction" that permit us to show that the essence of reliability is "solving" problems, so when we are the right tolerance in the system , we are also this "tolerance" to be able to avoid violence inside the system that causes problems to the system, so this solves problems, and this is the essence of reliability. Read the rest to understand better my thoughts: More political philosophy about economy.. I have to be smart, i explained before that performance and efficiency are "inherent" to reliability, this shows us on what have we to base our society and what have to be the conception of our society, because by my explanations you are "feeling" the essence of "reliability" and how it is related to morality, by "analogy" with economy and richness, security is also inherent to economy and to richness because they are related to reliability, because morality is reliability(as i have proved it to you in my previous posts), so when i say being rich is compatible with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you have to be rich, you have to understand that economy too is economy of today and economy of the future, and richness is richness of today and richness of the future, so "responsability"(that is security) is inherent to richness and to economy. So as you are noticing there is no "contradiction" in my affirmation, and you are noticing that this must includes the requirements that we have to know how to wisely "protect" the "environment" and how to wisely protect our planet from exploitation and from pollution too. Read the rest to understand better my thoughts: About populism of today.. I think there is a "duality", USA is a "meritocracy" type of system, but "populism" that has voted for Donald Trump is "less" educated and "less" awareness and was not capable to adapt efficiently to "globalisation", so they were fearing "globalisation", so i think that they have to become more skilled and more educated to be more aware of globalisation and to be capable to understand more correctly globalisation and to be more capable to adapt to globalisation, thus the way is to be efficient thinking and more efficiency to be able to adapt. I will continu to do more political philosophy.. I think the most important thing today is that we have to construct a new "spirit", i think the new spirit must also be that we have to go from economy and see economy as an important tool to attain a civilization and to construct a new man that is more civilized, because notice with that when you are a rich country it is much "easier" for the people to become civilized(thus to become order etc.), so we have to give a great importance to economy today, for example China has a weakness that it is more centralized government that is lacking efficiency(read bellow to notice it), so they have to decentralize and to specialize more the parts of the government so that to be more "professionalism" that knows how to invest "efficiently" abroad, and i think we have to be more efficient thinking and more efficiency by investing more in technology and science to be able to enhance much more our living conditions. Read the rest of my previous thoughts: About the essence of communism Communism has tried to construct a new "man", but how can you construct a new man that is civilized or how can you construct a civilization if you remain more poor and your economy is not a good economy ? this is what we call pragmatism ! because as i said before being rich is compatible with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you have to be rich, if your country is not rich so it will be less "order" and more "insecurity" and more "corruption" ! this is why in my following writing i am speaking about efficiency and about reliability and about economy. Read all my following thoughts to understand better: What is the exceptionalism of USA ? You have to do more political philosophy to understand better USA.. If you are immature in politics you will say that USA is porno, so USA is bad, but this is childish thinking.. because we have to transcend with political philosophy to understand better USA.. As you have noticed i said that "reliability" is important and "efficiency" is important, and i have explained that efficiency is like performance, and since the essence of reliability is solving problems, and when we solve all problems we say that we are absolute reliability or absolute happiness that is the goal that guides morality towards its goal that is solving all our problems, so reliability pushes morality towards absolute reliability or absolute happiness, and since being performance is a problem to solve , so efficiency and performance are inherent to reliability, now there is something important that remains, you have to be able to feel the essence of civilization to be able to understand USA, USA wanted and want to be "rich" to be able to be a leader and to be able to be a leader in technology and science and to be able to be a policeman of the world that brings order, and so that to benefit the world with its high quality products and high quality services, not only that but you will notice that in philosophy the fact that USA has become rich has caused that USA has become less "corrupt", so this richness of USA makes USA be less corrupt than third world countries or less corrupt than China or than Russia etc. so this is the advantage of being rich, because being rich is compatible with "civilization", because you have to be rich to be able to be a civilization, and i think that this is also what we call the exceptionalism of USA. So USA has not to fail, and USA has to eliminate its "deficit" and to reduce its debt so that to be more capable as a country. More philosophy about efficiency.. We have to be more smart , you have seen me talking about efficiency, and i said that you have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed and to be able to be responsability and success you have to give much more importance to "efficiency", but there is a problem that remains, it is how will you "interpret" "efficiency" ? USA will interpret efficiency as being more decentralization of the government that specializes the decentralized parts of the governement to be able to be "efficiency", but China will interpret efficiency to be more "centralized" government, but this more centralized government of China is causing problems to efficiency and we are noticing it by the fact that many of the huge investments abroad of China is inefficiency that causes more debt and problems to China(please read bellow to notice it), and i think that the cause of this inefficiency of China is the fact that efficiency is interpreted as being more "centralization" of government of China and this centralization has caused a lack of "professionalism" that has caused problems to China. How to be responsability ? First step you have to prioritize to be able to succeed ! And to wich would you give much more |
| Sky89 <a@a.a>: Aug 31 03:05PM -0700 Hello.... Read this: About the essence of political philosophy.. I am a white arab, but i am not a muslim As you have noticed i am not wasting my time with Islam, because Islam is very inefficient as a system and as an economic system, and as you have noticed i am doing more political philosophy here, and why am i doing more political philosophy ? because political philosophy permits us to transcend our living conditions and permits us to be awareness that is more "efficient", so here again you are noticing that i am giving much more importance to efficiency, i give you an example: If i ask you a question of what is the best way to succeed in life ? If you understand the essence of this question, you will understand better the "essence" of political philosophy, because political philosophy is morality that is reliability as i have explained, so since morality is constrained by reliability, thus it must be a decent morality so that to be able to call it morality or reliability, so as you have noticed political correctness and symbolism of political correctness is part of morality, because being political "correctness" is being correctness that is "measured" by morality that has to be maximization at best of reliability and it must be "decent" morality to be able to call it morality so that to not cause desorder and violence inside the system, so as you are noticing political philosophy permits us to be more successful as a system, by doing political philosophy i am discovering the architectural ideas and the steps that permit us to construct a more successful political system, so as you have noticed i have spoken in my political philosophy about: 1- Hierarchy 2- Richness 3- Efficiency 4- And about economy 5- And about morality etc. Read my following thoughts to understand better(And i will post to you my other thoughts of my political philosophy): More political philosophy.. You have seen me talking about USA and about communism.. How do you think people around the world are judging communism and are judging USA ? Philosophically we know that we have the strong and the weak, but if the weak just want to be equal to the strong , is it acceptable by logic ? i don't think so because the weak is also "inefficiency" and he has the "tendency" to be more "corrupt" or more "desorder" ! and from philosophy we can say that "hierarchy" by the the fact that nature and culture wants the strong to be strong and want him to guide people and to give quality and want him to give efficiency ! so from this we can say that this "hierarchy" is allowed by logic ! but political philosophy gives a "great" priority to the fact that we have to know how to "nuance" to be able to judge ! so we have for example to know that USA has its "advantages". This is why i said that: About the essence of USA... USA is meritocracy that has choosen to be "efficiency", and it has allowed the rich to be rich to attract more economic investment and to attract more smart people so that to become rich and to be at the forefront of technology and science. But can we ask ourselves an important question? what will be the world without USA ? this is the important question to ask ! and now you are starting to be "pragmatic" by asking this question ! and now you are starting to see the nuances and be capable of nuancing ! because one of the advantages of USA is that USA is in the forefront of technology and science and it is helping the world to advance in technology and science ! and since USA has become powerful so USA has wanted and wants to play a role of a policeman of the world to bring more order to the world ! so as you have noticed we have to be capable to see the advantages of USA ! this is how we will be capable of nuancing in politics ! And yet more about political philosophy.. And you saw me writing above about "hierarchy", so what about "richness" ? Read all my following thoughts to understand more: Yet more political philosophy about morality.. I said that morality is reliability. And look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is the "state" of being reliable. But there is still a question that remains: Why not say that morality is maximization at best of reliability ? Because if morality can not be viewed as morality because of failure of the system , so this can not be called reliability or morality, so this is why i am approximating with the word reliability, because if we call a system a decent morality that means that it can be called reliability, thus we can not say that morality is maximization at best of reliability because if maximization at best of reliability is not "sufficient" to give "decent" morality, so that's not reliability and that's not morality. Read the rest of my thoughts: I will yet get into more political philosophy.. This time about political correctness and symbolism that is part of political correctness.. You will notice that communism has used also symbolism that is part of political correctness to govern and for example national socialism of Algeria today uses political correctness and "symbolism" of political correctness to govern the people, so what do we have to think about political correctness and about this kind of symbolism that is part of political correctness that is used by such governance? i think that when we say political correctness, as you have noticed this contains the word "correctness", so i think that political correctness is also the way because correctness of political correctness is defined by measuring it by morality that is "reliability", because as i said that the essence of reliability is solving problems and reliability(thus morality) is pushed towards solving all our problems that is absolute reliability or absolute happiness, so correctness of political correctness has to be measured by reliability , this is why when we say that we have to be political correctness this is "logical" and this is a "truth", so from now you are able to understand that being political correctness is part of morality. Read the rest of my thought to understand better: I have to be more smart.. I said that morality is reliability. But look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is the "state" of being reliable, but here again you have to understand the essence of reliability, reliability is a balance of tolerance and efficiency and performance etc. that gives a "maximization" that we can call reliability, so here again you are feeling the essence of morality that is reliability, and i am choosing to say that morality is reliability to show a more correct "abstraction" that permit us to show that the essence of reliability is "solving" problems, so when we are the right tolerance in the system , we are also this "tolerance" to be able to avoid violence inside the system that causes problems to the system, so this solves problems, and this is the essence of reliability. Read the rest to understand better my thoughts: More political philosophy about economy.. I have to be smart, i explained before that performance and efficiency are "inherent" to reliability, this shows us on what have we to base our society and what have to be the conception of our society, because by my explanations you are "feeling" the essence of "reliability" and how it is related to morality, by "analogy" with economy and richness, security is also inherent to economy and to richness because they are related to reliability, because morality is reliability(as i have proved it to you in my previous posts), so when i say being rich is compatible with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you have to be rich, you have to understand that economy too is economy of today and economy of the future, and richness is richness of today and richness of the future, so "responsability"(that is security) is inherent to richness and to economy. So as you are noticing there is no "contradiction" in my affirmation, and you are noticing that this must includes the requirements that we have to know how to wisely "protect" the "environment" and how to wisely protect our planet from exploitation and from pollution too. Read the rest to understand better my thoughts: About populism of today.. I think there is a "duality", USA is a "meritocracy" type of system, but "populism" that has voted for Donald Trump is "less" educated and "less" awareness and was not capable to adapt efficiently to "globalisation", so they were fearing "globalisation", so i think that they have to become more skilled and more educated to be more aware of globalisation and to be capable to understand more correctly globalisation and to be more capable to adapt to globalisation, thus the way is to be efficient thinking and more efficiency to be able to adapt. I will continu to do more political philosophy.. I think the most important thing today is that we have to construct a new "spirit", i think the new spirit must also be that we have to go from economy and see economy as an important tool to attain a civilization and to construct a new man that is more civilized, because notice with that when you are a rich country it is much "easier" for the people to become civilized(thus to become order etc.), so we have to give a great importance to economy today, for example China has a weakness that it is more centralized government that is lacking efficiency(read bellow to notice it), so they have to decentralize and to specialize more the parts of the government so that to be more "professionalism" that knows how to invest "efficiently" abroad, and i think we have to be more efficient thinking and more efficiency by investing more in technology and science to be able to enhance much more our living conditions. Read the rest of my previous thoughts: About the essence of communism Communism has tried to construct a new "man", but how can you construct a new man that is civilized or how can you construct a civilization if you remain more poor and your economy is not a good economy ? this is what we call pragmatism ! because as i said before being rich is compatible with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you have to be rich, if your country is not rich so it will be less "order" and more "insecurity" and more "corruption" ! this is why in my following writing i am speaking about efficiency and about reliability and about economy. Read all my following thoughts to understand better: What is the exceptionalism of USA ? You have to do more political philosophy to understand better USA.. If you are immature in politics you will say that USA is porno, so USA is bad, but this is childish thinking.. because we have to transcend with political philosophy to understand better USA.. As you have noticed i said that "reliability" is important and "efficiency" is important, and i have explained that efficiency is like performance, and since the essence of reliability is solving problems, and when we solve all problems we say that we are absolute reliability or absolute happiness that is the goal that guides morality towards its goal that is solving all our problems, so reliability pushes morality towards absolute reliability or absolute happiness, and since being performance is a problem to solve , so efficiency and performance are inherent to reliability, now there is something important that remains, you have to be able to feel the essence of civilization to be able to understand USA, USA wanted and want to be "rich" to be able to be a leader and to be able to be a leader in technology and science and to be able to be a policeman of the world that brings order, and so that to benefit the world with its high quality products and high quality services, not only that but you will notice that in philosophy the fact that USA has become rich has caused that USA has become less "corrupt", so this richness of USA makes USA be less corrupt than third world countries or less corrupt than China or than Russia etc. so this is the advantage of being rich, because being rich is compatible with "civilization", because you have to be rich to be able to be a civilization, and i think that this is also what we call the exceptionalism of USA. So USA has not to fail, and USA has to eliminate its "deficit" and to reduce its debt so that to be more capable as a country. More philosophy about efficiency.. We have to be more smart , you have seen me talking about efficiency, and i said that you have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed and to be able to be responsability and success you have to give much more importance to "efficiency", but there is a problem that remains, it is how will you "interpret" "efficiency" ? USA will interpret efficiency as being more decentralization of the government that specializes the decentralized parts of the governement to be able to be "efficiency", but China will interpret efficiency to be more "centralized" government, but this more centralized government of China is causing problems to efficiency and we are noticing it by the fact that many of the huge investments abroad of China is inefficiency that causes more debt and problems to China(please read bellow to notice it), and i think that the cause of this inefficiency of China is the fact that efficiency is interpreted as being more "centralization" of government of China and this centralization has caused a lack of "professionalism" that has caused problems to China. How to be responsability ? First step you have to prioritize to be able to succeed ! And to wich would you give much more importance ? You have to give much more importance to "efficiency" ! You have to think efficiently and be more efficient and this has some requirements ! For example easy thinking will ask for love and compassion.. But what do you think is also compassion and love ? Look at USA , why some of you in USA are not happy and become more violent ? It is because of efficiency ! Because survival and quality need efficiency ! And because love and compassion need efficiency ! But you have not to be like fools because USA is capable to adapt quickly to efficiency and to efficient thinking ! So you have to be more patience with USA and to give a chance to USA ! Because USA knows about efficiency and USA can adapt quickly ! So we have not to be pessimistic about USA ! Read the rest: What is to be primitive ? I am a white arab and you know me more that i am not primitive as ISIS or Al Qaida, i am a more sophisticated white arab, and what is it to be primitive ? i am not primitive because i am saying to myself that "efficiency" is of a great importance ! so i am trying to be more and more efficient ! ISIS and Al Qaida are inferior thinking that is not efficient and also because it is causing a mess to muslims ! the best way to fight ISIS and Al Qaida is to be efficient thinking and to be efficiency ! i don't like to be like primitive ! because it is risky and dangerous and it is not dignity ! so this is why i am talking "rules" and "laws" to be more efficiency and to be more efficient thinking , because order is "primordial", without laws and rules there is no order |
| Sky89 <a@a.a>: Aug 31 01:28PM -0700 Hello.... Read this: Can China build a US$145 million superconducting computer that will change the world? Read this new interesting news from China: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2161390/can-china-build-us145-million-superconducting-computer-will Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Sky89 <a@a.a>: Aug 31 01:09PM -0700 Hello... More political philosophy.. You have seen me talking about USA and about communism.. How do you think people around the world are judging communism and are judging USA ? Philosophically we know that we have the strong and the weak, but if the weak just want to be equal to the strong , is it acceptable by logic ? i don't think so because the weak is also "inefficiency" and he has the "tendency" to be more "corrupt" or more "desorder" ! and from philosophy we can say that "hierarchy" by the the fact that nature and culture wants the strong to be strong and want him to guide people and to give quality and want him to give efficiency ! so from this we can say that this "hierarchy" is allowed by logic ! but political philosophy gives a "great" priority to the fact that we have to know how to "nuance" to be able to judge ! so we have for example to know that USA has its "advantages". This is why i said that: About the essence of USA... USA is meritocracy that has choosen to be "efficiency", and it has allowed the rich to be rich to attract more economic investment and to attract more smart people so that to become rich and to be at the forefront of technology and science. But can we ask ourselves an important question? what will be the world without USA ? this is the important question to ask ! and now you are starting to be "pragmatic" by asking this question ! and now you are starting to see the nuances and be capable of nuancing ! because one of the advantages of USA is that USA is in the forefront of technology and science and it is helping the world to advance in technology and science ! and since USA has become powerful so USA has wanted and wants to play a role of a policeman of the world to bring more order to the world ! so as you have noticed we have to be capable to see the advantages of USA ! this is how we will be capable of nuancing in politics ! And yet more about political philosophy.. And you saw me writing above about "hierarchy", so what about "richness" ? Read all my following thoughts to understand more: Yet more political philosophy about morality.. I said that morality is reliability. And look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is the "state" of being reliable. But there is still a question that remains: Why not say that morality is maximization at best of reliability ? Because if morality can not be viewed as morality because of failure of the system , so this can not be called reliability or morality, so this is why i am approximating with the word reliability, because if we call a system a decent morality that means that it can be called reliability, thus we can not say that morality is maximization at best of reliability because if maximization at best of reliability is not "sufficient" to give "decent" morality, so that's not reliability and that's not morality. Read the rest of my thoughts: I will yet get into more political philosophy.. This time about political correctness and symbolism that is part of political correctness.. You will notice that communism has used also symbolism that is part of political correctness to govern and for example national socialism of Algeria today uses political correctness and "symbolism" of political correctness to govern the people, so what do we have to think about political correctness and about this kind of symbolism that is part of political correctness that is used by such governance? i think that when we say political correctness, as you have noticed this contains the word "correctness", so i think that political correctness is also the way because correctness of political correctness is defined by measuring it by morality that is "reliability", because as i said that the essence of reliability is solving problems and reliability(thus morality) is pushed towards solving all our problems that is absolute reliability or absolute happiness, so correctness of political correctness has to be measured by reliability , this is why when we say that we have to be political correctness this is "logical" and this is a "truth", so from now you are able to understand that being political correctness is part of morality. Read the rest of my thought to understand better: I have to be more smart.. I said that morality is reliability. But look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is the "state" of being reliable, but here again you have to understand the essence of reliability, reliability is a balance of tolerance and efficiency and performance etc. that gives a "maximization" that we can call reliability, so here again you are feeling the essence of morality that is reliability, and i am choosing to say that morality is reliability to show a more correct "abstraction" that permit us to show that the essence of reliability is "solving" problems, so when we are the right tolerance in the system , we are also this "tolerance" to be able to avoid violence inside the system that causes problems to the system, so this solves problems, and this is the essence of reliability. Read the rest to understand better my thoughts: More political philosophy about economy.. I have to be smart, i explained before that performance and efficiency are "inherent" to reliability, this shows us on what have we to base our society and what have to be the conception of our society, because by my explanations you are "feeling" the essence of "reliability" and how it is related to morality, by "analogy" with economy and richness, security is also inherent to economy and to richness because they are related to reliability, because morality is reliability(as i have proved it to you in my previous posts), so when i say being rich is compatible with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you have to be rich, you have to understand that economy too is economy of today and economy of the future, and richness is richness of today and richness of the future, so "responsability"(that is security) is inherent to richness and to economy. So as you are noticing there is no "contradiction" in my affirmation, and you are noticing that this must includes the requirements that we have to know how to wisely "protect" the "environment" and how to wisely protect our planet from exploitation and from pollution too. Read the rest to understand better my thoughts: About populism of today.. I think there is a "duality", USA is a "meritocracy" type of system, but "populism" that has voted for Donald Trump is "less" educated and "less" awareness and was not capable to adapt efficiently to "globalisation", so they were fearing "globalisation", so i think that they have to become more skilled and more educated to be more aware of globalisation and to be capable to understand more correctly globalisation and to be more capable to adapt to globalisation, thus the way is to be efficient thinking and more efficiency to be able to adapt. I will continu to do more political philosophy.. I think the most important thing today is that we have to construct a new "spirit", i think the new spirit must also be that we have to go from economy and see economy as an important tool to attain a civilization and to construct a new man that is more civilized, because notice with that when you are a rich country it is much "easier" for the people to become civilized(thus to become order etc.), so we have to give a great importance to economy today, for example China has a weakness that it is more centralized government that is lacking efficiency(read bellow to notice it), so they have to decentralize and to specialize more the parts of the government so that to be more "professionalism" that knows how to invest "efficiently" abroad, and i think we have to be more efficient thinking and more efficiency by investing more in technology and science to be able to enhance much more our living conditions. Read the rest of my previous thoughts: About the essence of communism Communism has tried to construct a new "man", but how can you construct a new man that is civilized or how can you construct a civilization if you remain more poor and your economy is not a good economy ? this is what we call pragmatism ! because as i said before being rich is compatible with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you have to be rich, if your country is not rich so it will be less "order" and more "insecurity" and more "corruption" ! this is why in my following writing i am speaking about efficiency and about reliability and about economy. Read all my following thoughts to understand better: What is the exceptionalism of USA ? You have to do more political philosophy to understand better USA.. If you are immature in politics you will say that USA is porno, so USA is bad, but this is childish thinking.. because we have to transcend with political philosophy to understand better USA.. As you have noticed i said that "reliability" is important and "efficiency" is important, and i have explained that efficiency is like performance, and since the essence of reliability is solving problems, and when we solve all problems we say that we are absolute reliability or absolute happiness that is the goal that guides morality towards its goal that is solving all our problems, so reliability pushes morality towards absolute reliability or absolute happiness, and since being performance is a problem to solve , so efficiency and performance are inherent to reliability, now there is something important that remains, you have to be able to feel the essence of civilization to be able to understand USA, USA wanted and want to be "rich" to be able to be a leader and to be able to be a leader in technology and science and to be able to be a policeman of the world that brings order, and so that to benefit the world with its high quality products and high quality services, not only that but you will notice that in philosophy the fact that USA has become rich has caused that USA has become less "corrupt", so this richness of USA makes USA be less corrupt than third world countries or less corrupt than China or than Russia etc. so this is the advantage of being rich, because being rich is compatible with "civilization", because you have to be rich to be able to be a civilization, and i think that this is also what we call the exceptionalism of USA. So USA has not to fail, and USA has to eliminate its "deficit" and to reduce its debt so that to be more capable as a country. More philosophy about efficiency.. We have to be more smart , you have seen me talking about efficiency, and i said that you have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed and to be able to be responsability and success you have to give much more importance to "efficiency", but there is a problem that remains, it is how will you "interpret" "efficiency" ? USA will interpret efficiency as being more decentralization of the government that specializes the decentralized parts of the governement to be able to be "efficiency", but China will interpret efficiency to be more "centralized" government, but this more centralized government of China is causing problems to efficiency and we are noticing it by the fact that many of the huge investments abroad of China is inefficiency that causes more debt and problems to China(please read bellow to notice it), and i think that the cause of this inefficiency of China is the fact that efficiency is interpreted as being more "centralization" of government of China and this centralization has caused a lack of "professionalism" that has caused problems to China. How to be responsability ? First step you have to prioritize to be able to succeed ! And to wich would you give much more importance ? You have to give much more importance to "efficiency" ! You have to think efficiently and be more efficient and this has some requirements ! For example easy thinking will ask for love and compassion.. But what do you think is also compassion and love ? Look at USA , why some of you in USA are not happy and become more violent ? It is because of efficiency ! Because survival and quality need efficiency ! And because love and compassion need efficiency ! But you have not to be like fools because USA is capable to adapt quickly to efficiency and to efficient thinking ! So you have to be more patience with USA and to give a chance to USA ! Because USA knows about efficiency and USA can adapt quickly ! So we have not to be pessimistic about USA ! Read the rest: What is to be primitive ? I am a white arab and you know me more that i am not primitive as ISIS or Al Qaida, i am a more sophisticated white arab, and what is it to be primitive ? i am not primitive because i am saying to myself that "efficiency" is of a great importance ! so i am trying to be more and more efficient ! ISIS and Al Qaida are inferior thinking that is not efficient and also because it is causing a mess to muslims ! the best way to fight ISIS and Al Qaida is to be efficient thinking and to be efficiency ! i don't like to be like primitive ! because it is risky and dangerous and it is not dignity ! so this is why i am talking "rules" and "laws" to be more efficiency and to be more efficient thinking , because order is "primordial", without laws and rules there is no order ! so there is no country and no society and no civilization ! so it is primitiveness that i don't want at all ! you have to understand my way of thinking ! i am for example saying to myself that i want my society to be efficient economy to be able to survive better , so to fulfill this requirement i need to respect efficient laws and rules ! this is a requirement for me that must be fullfilled because survival is dependent on it ! so i am not kinding with laws and rules ! and primitiveness is not dignity for me ! so i have to be more efficiency and more efficient thinking ! i am constantly focussing on efficiency and efficient thinking to be more dignity for me ! this also why i am a more serious computer programmer who has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, because i am always seeking to be more "dignity" by being more efficiency and more efficient thinking ! this is my way of doing and this is my spirit ! USA is a country of rules and laws I said before that USA is a country of laws , and i love it ! Look for example at this: Computer Programmers Get New Tech Ethics Code Read more here: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/computer-programmers-get-new-tech-ethics-code/ This article comes from Scientific American here: https://www.scientificamerican.com/tech/ So as you are noticing Computer Programmers Get New Tech Ethics Code in USA, so as you are noticing USA is a country of "rules" and "laws", this is why i love it, and you are noticing that USA is adapting quickly to efficiency and to efficient thinking. Read the rest of my thoughts: I am a white arab, and you know me better now.. About our beloved USA.. As you have noticed that i love USA because i am a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and i think i will sell some of my algorithms |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment