- About the essence of morality - 1 Update
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Sep 10 11:27AM -0700 Hello.. Read this: About the essence of morality More political philosophy now.. If you have noticed on my writing i said that: 1- Morality is reliability And i said that: 2- Morality is reliability at best And i said that: 3- Morality is perfection at best. But you will have the tendency to say that my above definitions are not correct thinking, but here is my logical proof of my above definitions: When i said that: 1- Morality is reliability Look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that: Morality is reliability that means that it can be Morality is the quality of being reliability, so it is like a "concept" of reliability, that means that it can vary from 0% to 100%, and we know that since morality is perfection at best from my following logical proof: Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system And we know that it is inherent to maximizing at best the good that it is also minimizing at best "failures", so i think my above logical proof is correct. So when i say above that: Reliability is the quality of being reliable, it means that the quality of being reliable is also measured by measuring prefection at best, because being reliability is also solving the problem to be able to be perfection at best. Also when i say Morality is reliability, it means that it is not only that reliability is the quality of being reliable, but it is also a state of being reliable, because as i said in my above logical proof: "But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" That means that reliability that is the quality of being reliable must be at least decent morality, because without being at least decent morality we can not call it morality, because there is like a constrain over morality that must be at least decent morality to be able to call it morality. Now i said also that: And i said that: 2- Morality is reliability at best And i said that: 3- Morality is perfection at best. And that can be understood by my above proof and my above writing. More political philosophy now.. I will speak about an important subject in political philosophy: As you have noticed beauty and love has been created by wildness of nature, and after that in the past since perfection was not enough to ensure a decent morality , that is a decent perfection, humans have behaved more violently with wars and by practicing slavery etc, so in that past people were suffering more desorder and violence etc, so i think we have to be wiser by looking at our actual morality that is perfection at best,and to be able to judge it more "wisely", so do we have to be pessimistic of our morality, i don't think so, because there is a also a big constrain that morality has to be at least a decent morality that is a decent perfection to avoid desorder and violence inside the system, but here comes an important question: How to judge that it is a decent morality ? here again there is also interpretations of neo-nazism that is too violent that don't know how to tune perfection correctly, because neo-nazism is racism and it is extremism of "perfection" this is why they are discriminating too much, and this is not perfection at best that is morality, because perfection(and thus morality) is also knowing how to maximize at best success by minimizing at best failures, here again to be successful at minimizing the failures you have to "prioritize", this is why neo-nazism must know how to accept the right "imperfections" to be able to be "correct" perfection, this is why countries such as Canada and other european countries are accepting arab immigrants even if some arab immigrants are less beautiful than white europeans, because beautifulness is interpreted as being less important than the fact that arab immigrants are useful for economic growth and for the the social system etc. and this is morality that prioritize to be able to be successful, this is why neo-nazism that is too violent towards immigrants is not correct morality that knows how to manage itself, so i don't agree with neo-nazism and such idelogies that contain many bugs. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment