| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Sep 18 08:06AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Sep 19 09:50AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Sep 19 09:50AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Sep 19 09:51AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Sep 18 01:47PM -0700 Hello, Read this: What is the essence of truth ? This is a good subject of political philosophy ! How do we measure the truth ? The truth is measured by our our senses and by our smartness and by rationalism and by empiricism ! So i think we can feel the relativeness of truth, i mean that the truth is measured by a reference of measure , but there can be many references of measure that gives different results of truth ! and thus we have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed ! i give you an example: when i said (read below) that decent morality has to be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best so that the government enforce more correctly "order", this government needs to prioritize wich of the reference of measures of the truth are more "valid" ! so there is the reference of measure that is happiness or absolute happiness , but since law enforcement of "order" that is of a "highest" priority, so the "truth" of: is it decent morality or not ? must be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best in itself so that to say that it is decent morality or not ! so here again you are noticing the relativeness of the truth since the reference of measure is choosen among many and is prioritized ! Read my following previous thoughts about the essence of smartness and the essence of morality, about the essence of smartness and the essence of morality so that you understand better: What is the essence of human smartness ? This is a good subject of political philosophy.. So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly.. Individual human smartness is composed of genetical smartness and cultural smartness.. But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct. But what is the smartness of a group of humans ? It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not a sufficient definition because it must be more understood, because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more "hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to invent new things. More about me: As you have noticed i am a white arab, and a more serious computer programmer, but you have to know more about me, my father is very smart, the genetical IQ of my father is 135, and my genetical IQ is around 120, but i have lost some IQ points because my nutrition was not so good because i was disliking many vegetables and my nutrition was not balanced so i have lost some IQ points because of this envirenmental factor, but my genetical IQ is around 120. And i invite you to read the following webpage: Raise Your Child's IQ with Multivitamins http://tipsdiscover.com/health/raise-your-childs-iq-with-multivitamins/ And here is my proof of what is morality: About the essence of morality More political philosophy now.. If you have noticed on my writing i said that: 1- Morality is reliability And i said that: 2- Morality is reliability at best And i said that: 3- Morality is perfection at best. But you will have the tendency to say that my above definitions are not correct thinking, but here is my logical proof of my above definitions: When i said that: 1- Morality is reliability Look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that: Morality is reliability that means that it can be Morality is the quality of being reliability, so it is like a "concept" of reliability, that means that it can vary from 0% to 100%, and we know that since morality is perfection at best from my following logical proof: Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system And we know that it is inherent to maximizing at best the good that it is also minimizing at best "failures", so i think my above logical proof is correct. So when i say above that: Reliability is the quality of being reliable, it means that the quality of being reliable is also measured by measuring prefection at best, because being reliability is also solving the problem to be able to be perfection at best. Also when i say Morality is reliability, it means that it is not only that reliability is the quality of being reliable, but it is also a state of being reliable, because as i said in my above logical proof: "But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" That means that reliability that is the quality of being reliable must be at least decent morality, because without being at least decent morality we can not call it morality, because there is like a constrain over morality that must be at least decent morality to be able to call it morality. So here again we have to be smart, how can we "measure" to be able to call it decent morality ? here again we have to be smart, there is "absolute" measure and "relative" measure, so you can measure morality by absolute measure that is "absolute perfection" that is like absolute happiness, or you can measure morality relatively by "happiness", or you can measure morality relatively by the actual perfection at best in itself ! and i think that we have to measure morality by the actual perfection at best and say for example that this actual perfection at best is "order" that enforce calling morality a decent morality , so the actual perfection at best can call morality a decent morality to enforce "order" that is "necessary". Also i think that the tendency of today is that Perfection at best of today is balancing perfection with "civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder. Now i also said also that: And i said that: 2- Morality is reliability at best And i said that: 3- Morality is perfection at best. And that can be understood by my above proof and my above writing. More political philosophy now.. I will speak about an important subject in political philosophy: As you have noticed beauty and love has been created by wildness of nature, and after that in the past since perfection was not enough to ensure a decent morality , that is a decent perfection, humans have behaved more violently with wars and by practicing slavery etc, so in that past people were suffering more desorder and violence etc, so i think we have to be wiser by looking at our actual morality that is perfection at best,and to be able to judge it more "wisely", so do we have to be pessimistic of our morality ? i don't think so, because there is a also a big constrain that morality has to be at least a decent morality that is a decent perfection to avoid desorder and violence inside the system, but here comes an important question: How to judge that it is a decent morality ? here again there is also interpretation of neo-nazism that is too violent that don't know how to tune perfection correctly, because neo-nazism is racism and it is extremism of "perfection" this is why they are discriminating too much, and this is not perfection at best that is morality, because perfection(and thus morality) is also knowing how to maximize at best success by minimizing at best failures, here again to be successful at minimizing the failures you have to "prioritize", this is why neo-nazism must know how to accept the right "imperfections" to be able to be "correct" perfection, this is why countries such as Canada and other european countries are accepting arab immigrants even if some arab immigrants are less beautiful than white europeans, because beautifulness is interpreted as being less important than the fact that arab immigrants are useful for economic growth and for the the social system etc. and this is morality that prioritize to be able to be successful, this is why neo-nazism that is too violent towards immigrants is not correct morality that knows how to manage itself, so i don't agree with neo-nazism and such idelogies that contain many bugs. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Sep 18 12:21PM -0700 Hello, Look at this interesting video: An Open Source CPU ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8jqGOgCy5M Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Sep 18 10:24AM -0700 Hello.. Read this: Read my following thoughts, that i enhanced more, about the essence of smartness and the essence of morality.. What is the essence of human smartness ? This is a good subject of political philosophy.. So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly.. Individual human smartness is composed of genetical smartness and cultural smartness.. But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct. But what is the smartness of a group of humans ? It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not a sufficient definition because it must be more understood, because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more "hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to invent new things. More about me: As you have noticed i am a white arab, and a more serious computer programmer, but you have to know more about me, my father is very smart, the genetical IQ of my father is 135, and my genetical IQ is around 120, but i have lost some IQ points because my nutrition was not so good because i was disliking many vegetables and my nutrition was not balanced so i have lost some IQ points because of this envirenmental factor, but my genetical IQ is around 120. And i invite you to read the following webpage: Raise Your Child's IQ with Multivitamins http://tipsdiscover.com/health/raise-your-childs-iq-with-multivitamins/ And here is my proof of what is morality: About the essence of morality More political philosophy now.. If you have noticed on my writing i said that: 1- Morality is reliability And i said that: 2- Morality is reliability at best And i said that: 3- Morality is perfection at best. But you will have the tendency to say that my above definitions are not correct thinking, but here is my logical proof of my above definitions: When i said that: 1- Morality is reliability Look at the dictionary here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability It says that: Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable. So when i say that: Morality is reliability that means that it can be Morality is the quality of being reliability, so it is like a "concept" of reliability, that means that it can vary from 0% to 100%, and we know that since morality is perfection at best from my following logical proof: Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system And we know that it is inherent to maximizing at best the good that it is also minimizing at best "failures", so i think my above logical proof is correct. So when i say above that: Reliability is the quality of being reliable, it means that the quality of being reliable is also measured by measuring prefection at best, because being reliability is also solving the problem to be able to be perfection at best. Also when i say Morality is reliability, it means that it is not only that reliability is the quality of being reliable, but it is also a state of being reliable, because as i said in my above logical proof: "But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" That means that reliability that is the quality of being reliable must be at least decent morality, because without being at least decent morality we can not call it morality, because there is like a constrain over morality that must be at least decent morality to be able to call it morality. So here again we have to be smart, how can we "measure" to be able to call it decent morality ? here again we have to be smart, there is "absolute" measure and "relative" measure, so you can measure morality by absolute measure that is "absolute perfection" that is like absolute happiness, or you can measure morality relatively by "happiness", or you can measure morality relatively by the actual perfection at best in itself ! and i think that we have to measure morality by the actual perfection at best and say for example that this actual perfection at best is "order" that enforce calling morality a decent morality , so the actual perfection at best can call morality a decent morality to enforce "order" that is "necessary". Also i think that the tendency of today is that Perfection at best of today is balancing perfection with "civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder. Now i also said also that: And i said that: 2- Morality is reliability at best And i said that: 3- Morality is perfection at best. And that can be understood by my above proof and my above writing. More political philosophy now.. I will speak about an important subject in political philosophy: As you have noticed beauty and love has been created by wildness of nature, and after that in the past since perfection was not enough to ensure a decent morality , that is a decent perfection, humans have behaved more violently with wars and by practicing slavery etc, so in that past people were suffering more desorder and violence etc, so i think we have to be wiser by looking at our actual morality that is perfection at best,and to be able to judge it more "wisely", so do we have to be pessimistic of our morality, i don't think so, because there is a also a big constrain that morality has to be at least a decent morality that is a decent perfection to avoid desorder and violence inside the system, but here comes an important question: How to judge that it is a decent morality ? here again there is also interpretation of neo-nazism that is too violent that don't know how to tune perfection correctly, because neo-nazism is racism and it is extremism of "perfection" this is why they are discriminating too much, and this is not perfection at best that is morality, because perfection(and thus morality) is also knowing how to maximize at best success by minimizing at best failures, here again to be successful at minimizing the failures you have to "prioritize", this is why neo-nazism must know how to accept the right "imperfections" to be able to be "correct" perfection, this is why countries such as Canada and other european countries are accepting arab immigrants even if some arab immigrants are less beautiful than white europeans, because beautifulness is interpreted as being less important than the fact that arab immigrants are useful for economic growth and for the the social system etc. and this is morality that prioritize to be able to be successful, this is why neo-nazism that is too violent towards immigrants is not correct morality that knows how to manage itself, so i don't agree with neo-nazism and such idelogies that contain many bugs. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment