- [Jesus Loves You] How'd we become so depraved? - 6 Updates
- Demo of semantic concept folding in "neos" my universal compiler! - 16 Updates
- Rick and his boyfriend... - 2 Updates
- Derezzing - 1 Update
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: May 26 06:15AM -0700 On Friday, May 24, 2019 at 2:04:58 PM UTC-4, Mr Flibble wrote: > Nobody cares you obtuse, [expletives deleted] Leigh, I don't mind if you disagree with everything I stand for in this world and lead a charge against it with the full force of your life's energy. But you can do it in a civil way. Be civil in all you do (not just to me). Respect other people because you don't know where they are, why they are the way they are, what they've been through, what they're going through. Try to be loving, caring, kind, considerate, even of positions that differ completely from your own. That's the general rule. There are exceptions (Jude 22-23), but on the whole it's the proper way to be. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jude+22-23&version=KJV 22 And of some have compassion, making a difference: 23 And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh. You can do it, Leigh. You're a most capable individual. Look at your skill set applied to coding. You are strong and can achieve what you set your mind to. Seek to do it rightly, helpfully, in building up and not tearing down. If you truly think I'm wrong, try and teach me. Go through your beliefs point by point and show me where I'm wrong so I'll know the truth. Be that kind of teacher seeking to make my life better, rather than having me be deceived as you believe I am today. If you're right, your efforts will not be un-rewarded. You would receive my thanks, and the thanks of how many other people in my life that would be impacted by your input? Help a brother out, man. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 02:24PM +0100 On 26/05/2019 14:15, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > be un-rewarded. You would receive my thanks, and the thanks of how > many other people in my life that would be impacted by your input? > Help a brother out, man. I have done this many times with you but each time your obtuseness turns the "debate" into a dead end. If evolution is a lie then why did your god make the universe (including the Earth and its fossils) look billions of years old? If your god didn't do that then the only alternative is that your devil, Satan, invented fossils to separate us from your god's grace. So which is it, dear? Does your god have a warped sense of humour or did Satan invent fossils? The third option of course is that you are full of shit and you continually spout nonsense. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: May 26 10:01AM -0700 On Sunday, May 26, 2019 at 9:24:47 AM UTC-4, Mr Flibble wrote: > If evolution is a lie then why did your god make the universe (including > the Earth and its fossils) look billions of years old? He didn't. Man has interpreted what he sees up in the sky to be something other than what God has told us. But none of us have been up there to verify any of it. In addition, I've responded to you about this. If you were going to instantiate a 3D space game with planets and galaxies and such things, would you instantiate everything where it is and then wait for the billions of years it would take for light to move from one part of the scene's construction to the other parts? Or would you instantiate it in a working form, with everything in place, includ- ing the light rays which would've come from some distant place so that those on the "Earth" there could see them? That idea negates the statement that the universe has to be billions of years old. God could've instantiated everything as it appears to be with one go. But beyond that, there's nothing that we KNOW for certain to prove that the universe is billions of years old. Nor that the Earth is billions of years old. Nor that any of it is more than the ~6,000 years old the Bible says it is. > If your god didn't > do that then the only alternative is that your devil, Satan, invented > fossils to separate us from your god's grace. There's nothing to prove fossils are millions of years old. And the fact that they're finding soft tissue, red blood cells, in tact cart- ilage, indicates it's not even likely thousands of years, but maybe one thousand years or less max. In addition, DNA doesn't last more than a few thousand years under pristine conditions. They are find- ing in tact segments of DNA that could not be more than a few thou- sand years old max. There is evidence of a young Earth. No coral reefs on Earth are more than a few thousand years old. No deserts are more than a few thousand years old. No trees are more than a few thousand years old. Everything here points to a young Earth. > your god have a warped sense of humour or did Satan invent fossils? The > third option of course is that you .. continually > spout nonsense. The option you reject summarily is that God is true and Satan has deceived man into believing that the universe formed by ways that are not God-created, and that God doesn't exist. That deception has come by way of sin, and the evil spirit ability to impact our sinful flesh, our thinking, or beliefs, or feelings, to give us an augmented physical experience that doesn't just come from the physical world here, but from their spiritual input giv- ing us input. It's like an ear piece, and a thought machine, plugged into our na- tural senses, so that we actually hear thoughts enter into our mind, feel feelings that we really do feel in our natural senses, but the source of them is not us, not our natural world around us, but it is those evil spirits tempting us, leading us, pumping us full of their agendas so that we will respond and do sinful things before God. Take those evil spirits away, cast them out from our surroundings, and none of us would feel those things we feel today which are the sinful feelings we think we feel (homosexuality, addiction, lust, and all such related things). In the Bible, when Legion was set free from the evil spirits inside of him (he had enough to enter in to ~2,000 pigs), he was then in his right mind, clothed (he had been naked when the evil spirits were in him), and in his right mind (he had been lunatic, crying out, hiding in the hills, cutting himself, given super strength to where he could break out of binders they tried to hold him down with). He was sitting at the feet of Jesus asking to go with Him and become His disciple. But the people there in that community told Jesus to leave, so Jesus left the man who identified as Legion there, to serve as a reminder, a witness of God's miracle and sav- ing power, so that perhaps some of them could be saved over time even though they told Him to leave and never return. It's not possible for the flesh-only person to receive this knowl- edge, or to understand how it's possible. That's something only God can give you the ability to know and understand, and that only comes when you come to Jesus and ask forgiveness for your sin and are saved, making your spirit alive so you can then know and under- stand those things through your spirit (for it is not flesh that is able to know the spirit, but the spirit influences the flesh, which is how the enemy deceives people so). Seek the truth. Investigate DNA research. Discover the not only intelligent design there, but the incredible, off-the-charts, beyond- belief, absolutely staggering and complex design that would make any software project you'd work on look like wooden toys 8 month old kids would play with. The design alone is amazing, let alone the execution in chemicals and self-replication. Even the process of replicating DNA is beyond astounding, as one of them zips off a copy like normal, but the other one has to stitch it together backwards. Leigh, the truth exists. The enemy is real. He's been deceiving all people world-wide since Adam and Eve, but what Jesus has come to do is set us free from that deception, to set our feet on the strait and narrow path that leads to salvation, to reveal truth and righteousness to us, so that we can be set free from the enemy's stranglehold over our flesh. If you will pursue these things with a truth-seeking, fact-finding, honest-in-pursuit heart and sincere effort ... you will find it. God does not lie. And the answers are ALL there. Ask your big questions of God, but then press in to seek the answers and be prepared to have your prior thinking changed by what He will reveal to you. Be flexible and adaptive like your software design seeks to be, giving people great benefit by a single tool able to do multiple things. It's a new way of thinking for them, and you invite them to experience it. God invites you to experience a new way of thinking regarding Him and His universe. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 06:10PM +0100 On 26/05/2019 18:01, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > than a few thousand years under pristine conditions. They are find- > ing in tact segments of DNA that could not be more than a few thou- > sand years old max. You demented, obtuse fuck. You know very well that we have already told you (this must be the third time now) that that so called fossil soft tissue research has been falsified: THAT SOFTWARE TISSUE WAS A FOREIGN *CONTAMINANT* OF THE FOSSIL NOT A PART OF THE FOSSIL. So, given that, explain fossils you demented, obtuse fuck. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 06:16PM +0100 On 26/05/2019 18:10, Mr Flibble wrote: > tissue research has been falsified: THAT SOFTWARE TISSUE WAS A FOREIGN > *CONTAMINANT* OF THE FOSSIL NOT A PART OF THE FOSSIL. > So, given that, explain fossils you demented, obtuse fuck. See, you made me do a word typo of SOFTWARE for SOFT. This is why we don't want religious fuckheads in the technical space rubbing our fucking rhubarb. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: May 26 01:31PM -0700 On Sunday, May 26, 2019 at 1:10:24 PM UTC-4, Mr Flibble wrote: > you (this must be the third time now) that that so called fossil soft > tissue research has been falsified: THAT SOFTWARE TISSUE WAS A FOREIGN > *CONTAMINANT* OF THE FOSSIL NOT A PART OF THE FOSSIL. It wasn't. These signatures have been found several times in different places around the globe. The following are documented cases of original proteins being observed in fossilized samples: Tyrannosaurus rex, Triceratops, and a duckbill dinosaur from Montana Dinosaur eggs from Argentina Embryonic sauropod from southern China Psittacosaurus bones from China's Gobi Desert Archaeopteryx from Germany Lizard from Wyoming Seismosaur from New Mexico Mosasaurs from Kansas and Belgium Scorpion from Pennsylvania There have been cases of contamination in the DNA samples. However, they do still find DNA sequences that are unknown: "Scientists have even reported that some fossils have DNA, not just collagen and other proteins. However, microbes or human handlers can contaminate the specimens. When scientists find DNA sequences that do not match known contaminants, they gain more confidence that they have original DNA from the fossil..." It's not just contamination. It's original DNA material and the associated proteins that DNA produced. It's also fully in tact hard structures, like blood vessels containing blood cells. https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/when-did-dinosaurs-live/solid-answers-soft-tissue/ "Hardly a month passes without new reports of 'soft tissue' discovered in fossils." "Of course, if fossils are traces of life that lived a million or more years ago, then we have no reason to believe original organic molecules should be preserved, let alone cells or whole tissues like blood vessels. But many fossils do have these stunning features. "Dr. Mary Schweitzer and her team caught the world's attention with a Science paper in 2005 that described intact blood vessels and red blood cells in a T. rex bone. But in fact, secular scientists have been reporting them for decades in sometimes seldom-read technical literature..." "Collagen Survival Rates ... 900,000 years max." "DNA Survival Rates ... 650,000 years max." ==> "With these cautions in mind, believers in creation should graciously challenge others to explain how original tissue fossils can exist in an old earth. If honest, they may eventually admit that recent creation, as recorded in God's Word, provides the most scientifically solid answer." The most scientifically solid answer comes from the Biblical account, which not only accounts for many questions in science that secular arguments are unable to answer, but it also addresses the full gambit of speciation, genetic distribution, how we find fish fossils in high mountains, etc. The global flood, the rapid burial of tremendous amounts of life, the natural sediment layers breaking them out by weight and size, it would all add up to what the enemy of God would be able to say are various pre-historic eras lasting millions of years, but we have much evidence which refutes that they are layers like that, including many trees fossilized vertically through multiple layers all over the world. You've been listening to lies, Leigh. Their arguments sound okay, plausible, even reasonable ... until you begin to look at the many details and many samples being produced, all of which align with God's Biblical teaching of history perfectly. You were created. You weren't created to be profane and rude and hateful and mean as you are presently. You were created for glory, and the kind of glories angels envy. You were made for greatness, Leigh. The enemy has deceived you into a loss of your birthright. You're prepared to accept the meta- phorical bowl of soup for the entirety of your would-be inheritance, had you trusted in God and moved toward / with Him. It's not too late though. Today is the day of your salvation. Today is the day you cast off this sinful world and embrace eternity with Christ, in Heaven, to know your name is written in the Lamb's Book of Life, the list of which will be those saved on the day of judgment, the rest being cast into the eternal lake of fire. Seek the truth, Leigh. It will literally MAKE you free. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Bart <bc@freeuk.com>: May 26 12:37AM +0100 On 25/05/2019 23:49, Mr Flibble wrote: > Here is an example session demoing neos semantic concept folding > working! As I write this the only concept to support folding is the > string concept from character concepts. That's great - but what does it mean? > return 1; > else > return add(fib(x-1), fib(x-2)); Any reason you can't use "+" here, or is this just to exercise more of the language? Because "+" seems to work for strings. > print("Fibonacci(" + s + "): " + to_string(fib(to_integer(s))) + (For a scripting language, this looks rather clunky. But maybe it's early days.) |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 01:05AM +0100 On 26/05/2019 00:37, Bart wrote: > (For a scripting language, this looks rather clunky. But maybe it's early > days.) I think you are missing the point: creating a scripting language is secondary to what I am actually doing which is creating a universal compiler that can compile any programming language. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Bart <bc@freeuk.com>: May 26 01:31AM +0100 On 26/05/2019 01:05, Mr Flibble wrote: > I think you are missing the point: creating a scripting language is > secondary to what I am actually doing which is creating a universal > compiler that can compile any programming language. Well, OK, I think many are sceptical about that. To implement a language, you need something that describes or dictates its syntax and semantics and features (plus a bunch of things you didn't know it needed until you start a project like yours), stuff that normally takes the form of a discrete, dedicated compiler. And a discrete, dedicated interpreter for some languages. And a discrete, dedicated something else for others. You want to be able to represent that as data instead of code, fed into a single universal program. My experience of such things tells me that it is likely to be much better to have lots of streamlined, dedicated programs that work properly, than one giant program that tries to do everything, and does it badly. I've recently tried to combine two languages into one hybrid language. That didn't really work - while I could have taken it to a conclusion, it would have been poor. Instead the languages are distinct (two compilers, which need to work very differently as one needs to be highly dynamic), but are yet closely integrated. And this is just two languages - which share syntax. |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 02:14AM +0100 On 26/05/2019 01:31, Bart wrote: > which need to work very differently as one needs to be highly dynamic), > but are yet closely integrated. > And this is just two languages - which share syntax. Just because you failed to get something to work it doesn't mean I will. I know what I am doing. I am NOT creating "one giant program that tries to do everything, and does it badly" and I am NOT "combining languages into a hybrid language". I hate having to repeat myself but it seems I must: I am making a universal compiler that can compile any programming language, nothing more, nothing less. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>: May 26 03:28AM > hybrid language". I hate having to repeat myself but it seems I must: I am > making a universal compiler that can compile any programming language, > nothing more, nothing less. Besto of luck! -- press any key to continue or any other to quit... U ničemu ja ne uživam kao u svom statusu INVALIDA -- Zli Zec Na divljem zapadu i nije bilo tako puno nasilja, upravo zato jer su svi bili naoruzani. -- Mladen Gogala |
| Bart <bc@freeuk.com>: May 26 11:49AM +0100 On 26/05/2019 02:14, Mr Flibble wrote: > into a hybrid language". I hate having to repeat myself but it seems I > must: I am making a universal compiler that can compile any programming > language, nothing more, nothing less. It won't be able to compile one of mine without some input from me that tells you how. Does it make much difference whether that input is a data file, or an executable program (a compiler)? You will need something different for each language, in the same way that you might need a different compiler for each one. But I can see some difficulty in describing everything about a language purely using data. (Think of what's necessary in describing exactly how the C macro preprocessor works using tables. Or how you would describe the C include-file search algorithm. Or the ad-hoc logic needed to compile of mine.) You need code. |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 11:52AM +0100 On 26/05/2019 11:49, Bart wrote: > the C macro preprocessor works using tables. Or how you would describe the > C include-file search algorithm. Or the ad-hoc logic needed to compile of > mine.) You need code. My universal compiler is turing complete. It will be able to compile your programming language as it can compile ANY programming language. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Bart <bc@freeuk.com>: May 26 12:05PM +0100 On 26/05/2019 11:52, Mr Flibble wrote: > My universal compiler is turing complete. It will be able to compile > your programming language as it can compile ANY programming language. I'm not sure that makes sense, nor that that conclusion follows. Just about every /language/ is Turing complete, and can therefore also be used to implement any program including any compiler of any language. There's just the small matter of writing that program. |
| leigh.v.johnston@googlemail.com: May 26 04:19AM -0700 On Sunday, May 26, 2019 at 12:05:35 PM UTC+1, Bart wrote: > Just about every /language/ is Turing complete, and can therefore also > be used to implement any program including any compiler of any language. > There's just the small matter of writing that program. The fact that you fail to grasp what I am doing doesn't change the fact that I am writing a universal compiler that can compile any programming language including yours. /Leigh |
| blt_acgupshq@023mckkh70e4ypdabual021.com: May 26 02:47PM On Sun, 26 May 2019 02:14:02 +0100 >hybrid language". I hate having to repeat myself but it seems I must: I am >making a universal compiler that can compile any programming language, >nothing more, nothing less. Either you're A) Suffering from a lack of sleep and running on caffeine B) Having a manic episode or C) Trolling Take your pick. And if your genius idea is to have some kind of plug in front end per language that talks to a common back end, errr, thats been done for years. |
| blt_9uc7nw5dl_@70_uwd4gabhkv.gov: May 26 02:49PM On Sun, 26 May 2019 04:19:46 -0700 (PDT) >The fact that you fail to grasp what I am doing doesn't change the fact that I >am writing a universal compiler that can compile any programming language >including yours. Probably not a coincidence that you call yourself Mr Flibble (except in the above post, wrong identity selected?) since you're beginning to sound like Rimmer when he went mad in that red dwarf episode. |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 03:58PM +0100 > B) Having a manic episode or > C) Trolling > Take your pick. You forgot: D) Telling the truth because you are that good. And the correct answer would be: D > And if your genius idea is to have some kind of plug in front end per language > that talks to a common back end, errr, thats been done for years. Plugins are part of the solution but not in the way you suggest so what I am doing, I believe, hasn't been done before. I am cleanrooming this project and with it I hope to turn all "established" compiler theory on its head. This will be a paradigm shift and perhaps even a technological singularity in the world of computer software. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 04:18PM +0100 > Probably not a coincidence that you call yourself Mr Flibble (except in the > above post, wrong identity selected?) since you're beginning to sound like > Rimmer when he went mad in that red dwarf episode. Red Dwarf episode "Quarantine" did indeed feature a mad Rimmer and of course Mr Flibble but I will NOT be requiring the luck virus to implement my universal compiler that can compile any programming language. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| blt_pO0pge3@dxcqkj09bcv1ov6dntww.edu: May 26 04:01PM On Sun, 26 May 2019 15:58:29 +0100 >D) Telling the truth because you are that good. >And the correct answer would be: >D I'll assume that D is actually a laugh smiley. >project and with it I hope to turn all "established" compiler theory on >its head. This will be a paradigm shift and perhaps even a technological >singularity in the world of computer software. Sure, and while you're at it you'll solve P vs NP and create world peace. Let us know when its done so we can bask in your magnificence. |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 05:08PM +0100 >> singularity in the world of computer software. > Sure, and while you're at it you'll solve P vs NP and create world peace. > Let us know when its done so we can bask in your magnificence. ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░▄░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░█░░▄░░░░▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▄▄░░▄░░░█░▄▄▄░░░ ░▄▄▄▄▄░░█░░░░░░▀░░░░▀█░░▀▄░░░░░█▀▀░██░░ ░██▄▀██▄█░░░▄░░░░░░░██░░░░▀▀▀▀▀░░░░██░░ ░░▀██▄▀██░░░░░░░░▀░██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀██░ ░░░░▀████░▀░░░░▄░░░██░░░▄█░░░░▄░▄█░░██░ ░░░░░░░▀█░░░░▄░░░░░██░░░░▄░░░▄░░▄░░░██░ ░░░░░░░▄█▄░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀░░▄▀░░ ░░░░░░█▀▀█████████▀▀▀▀████████████▀░░░░ ░░░░░░████▀░░███▀░░░░░░▀███░░▀██▀░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Bart <bc@freeuk.com>: May 26 09:24PM +0100 On 26/05/2019 15:58, Mr Flibble wrote: > I am doing, I believe, hasn't been done before. I am cleanrooming this > project and with it I hope to turn all "established" compiler theory on > its head. Even ordinary compilers can be complex and large bits of software (look at the monstrous llvm). Your sounds like it would have to be as complex as the worst of those. By contrast, my current compiler project will be one of the simplest that I've tackled (and mine are generally simple): it will make the task of compilation not only appear effortless, but actually be effortless. Also one of the fastest to compile (and mine are already fast). Compiler theory doesn't come into it (I've been doing this stuff too long to need any formal theory). |
| gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack): May 26 01:40PM Found this laying around in my archives, titled, appropriately enough, "BestCLCPostEver". Enjoy! On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 9:33:11 AM UTC-5, Kenny McCormack wrote: > I think David should ask you out on a date. Then you guys can settle this > thing in-person, like the manly men that you are. > Your using CLC for cyber is getting rather anxiety-generating for the rest of us. You consider such things because you don't know what real love is, Kenny. You've never met Jesus Christ and, therefore, can only look to the forms the enemy teaches you as being valid. You hold these primary and out front in application as the dominant forms of love which exist, thereby casting something like the mention of one man loving another man immediately into the realm of that which is inappropriate. You do so because there is an enemy spirit at work in this world which guides men towards those ends through sin, and in this case he is guiding you. The only way to overcome it is is through faith in Jesus Christ, and the born again nature, and that comes from seeking the truth honestly, with your whole heart. Kenny, you do not have the born again nature, and therefore you can only look at things in the false form as by the guiding hand of the enemy at work in your flesh, because you cannot discern or know God's call unto your spirit. If you were born again (of the spirit), then His Holy Spirit would guide you into a proper understanding, and you would know that the ways of the enemy are false, and the ways of God are true. I pray you do seek the truth and come to this realization at some point. I would like to see you in Heaven. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin -- I've been watching cat videos on YouTube. More content and closer to the truth than anything on Fox. |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: May 26 10:03AM -0700 On Sunday, May 26, 2019 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, Kenny McCormack wrote: > "BestCLCPostEver". > Enjoy! > [snip] Kenny, Read the post I just wrote to Leigh. Much of it applies to you as well. If you want to know the truth you can. It is available to you, and is before you desiring with great earnestness for you to receive and learn from all of your days. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: May 26 01:50PM +0100 Hi! All things being equal probability dictates that our universe is a second class simulation so heed this piece of advice: failure to keep our masters entertained may result in them switching us off. The following video by MUSE shows what will happen when they are switching us off (a process also known as derezzing): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXPoJAyeF8k Alas in an isolated system entropy can only increase so we cannot escape our fate. /Flibble -- "You won't burn in hell. But be nice anyway." – Ricky Gervais "I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment