- Linguistics. Re: if cargo blocks - 9 Updates
- [Modération JNTP] Annulation de <q0j5c1$4se$8@dont-email.me> - 3 Updates
- Hell is real, so is Heaven - 8 Updates
- You have to understand my work - 1 Update
- Read again, more precision again - 1 Update
- I have just looked at the following Scalable hash map - 1 Update
- Multi-channel rand() - 1 Update
- OT: Github - 1 Update
| Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>: Jan 01 04:27PM -0800 In article <20181230061224.2ec7fd6a@assi.fritz.box>, > heard about that damnation only rather recently. Does that mean you are > not supposed to say "What are you looking for?" but should say "For what > are you looking?" instead? The former /feels/ correct because I hear it 'A preposition is something you shouldn't end a sentence with.' For a long time latin was regarded as the best language, and language loons tried to force english to be more like latin. This was part of that. The former is preferred among native speakers so that makes it correct. English has distinct features from latin. It has very little morphology: it makes sense in latin to distinguish nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc, but in english they are essentially the same thing. And what are called prepositions in latin are closer to what are called adjectives or adverb. Put the cat OUT. Felix was OUTed as a cat. Cats know the ins and OUTs of apartment life. That green cat stands OUT. That white cat is OUTstanding. OUT! OUT! damned Spot; let Felix in. The cat is OUTside. > very often, I guess more often than the latter. But then I also very > often hear "What do you got?" in American TV shows which feels like a > horrible abuse of language… Semantic shifts, a normal part of language evolution. 'get' is expanding into the semantic space of 'have'. A knight in shining armour started as a cniht in his master's servitude. It happens. -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \ to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed |
| Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>: Jan 01 04:30PM -0800 In article <q0akdp$74k$1@dont-email.me>, David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote: > "To boldly go where no man has gone before" - is it bad grammar, or has > it changed the language? It's been part of english for centuries. This was another silly attempt to force latin grammar on english. -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \ to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed |
| rbowman <bowman@montana.com>: Jan 01 10:30PM -0700 On 01/01/2019 05:27 PM, Siri Cruise wrote: > Semantic shifts, a normal part of language evolution. 'get' is expanding into > the semantic space of 'have'. A knight in shining armour started as a cniht in > his master's servitude. It happens. I'm reading a study that touches in part on linguistic paleontology as regards the differentiation of languages from a hypothetical proto Indo-European root. If humans don't self destruct in 2000 years I wonder what future linguists will have to work with? In a way C is the proto programming language. There certainly are other lineages but its influence is apparent in many newer languages. |
| Louis Krupp <lkrupp@nospam.pssw.com.invalid>: Jan 02 04:18AM -0700 >what future linguists will have to work with? >In a way C is the proto programming language. There certainly are other >lineages but its influence is apparent in many newer languages. There are programmers alive today who have written code in languages that predated -- and formed a basis for -- C. ALGOL is one of them, and ALGOL in turn was influenced by FORTRAN. And the modern version, spelled Fortran, is still in use. Louis |
| "Öö Tiib" <ootiib@hot.ee>: Jan 02 03:23AM -0800 On Monday, 31 December 2018 13:19:16 UTC+2, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > a time schedule associated with my task schedule, but life things come > up unexpectedly. This one is of my own doing and I have needs to > address it ahead of other things. Then perhaps concentrate on addressing what you need to. Ideas about oddball keywords, blocks, operators and punctuations are likely worthless in that other context. |
| gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack): Jan 02 06:09PM In article <7345f1c7-b181-4258-9d79-1738bc9857cc@googlegroups.com>, ร รถ Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> wrote: ... >Then perhaps concentrate on addressing what you need to. Ideas about >oddball keywords, blocks, operators and punctuations are likely worthless >in that other context. You totally misunderstand Rick's outlook on life. His programming projects are just like his religion. The idea is to keep talking about it - keeping hyping it up - rather than to provide anything that is actually tangible. I've worked in companies (*) that have had this same outlook - keep talking - keep inflating it - keep telling everybody how great it will be - but never actually produce anything. Because if you ever produce anything tangible, it will a) never be as good as what you're talking about and b) actually never be any good at all. It is no coincidence that his programming is just like his religion. It is no coincidence that the same sort of guy who goes in for the religious nonsense he peddles is the sort of guy who does this pie-in-the-sky programming. It's all the same scam. Think about typical religions. Think about what they talk about vs. what they actually produce. The difference couldn't be starker. Like with Rick's programming, they (religious leaders) have to keep coming up with new shit. If they ever stop coming up with new shit to keep themselves in the headlines, the whole enterprise comes crashing down. There's nothing as uninteresting as yesterday's garbage. You've got to keep coming up with new garbage to keep the sheep enthralled. Footnotes: (*) A couple of notes re: companies: 1) You'd be amazed how long you can keep this scam going. 2) To be fair, all companies have to do some of this. That is, hyping the "next big thing" - that is "just around the corner" - in order to keep people interested. But realistic companies try to keep it under control, and be sure to provide their customers with usable, tangible, products in the here and now. Neither religion nor Rick Hodgin, Inc., ever do. -- When I was growing up we called them "retards", but that's not PC anymore. Now, we just call them "Trump Voters". The question is, of course, how much longer it will be until that term is also un-PC. |
| Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>: Jan 03 09:50AM +1300 On 30/12/2018 04:42, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > should be done, possibly to undo something done in the in clause, > including possibly calling the out clause to undo that setup, and > prepare it for whatever other code is needed within the block. Why are proposing (at lest in c.l.c++) an unpleasant replacement for something the language already supports? -- Ian. |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 02 03:54PM -0500 On 1/2/2019 3:50 PM, Ian Collins wrote: >> prepare it for whatever other code is needed within the block. > Why are proposing (at lest in c.l.c++) an unpleasant replacement for > something the language already supports? I am unaware of its existence. Enlighten me, sir Ian. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 02 04:29PM -0500 On 1/2/2019 3:54 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> Why are proposing (at lest in c.l.c++) an unpleasant replacement for >> something the language already supports? > I am unaware of its existence. Enlighten me, sir Ian. [crickets] Cluck cluck cluck cluck.. :-) -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 09:07PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 09:07PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 09:08PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>: Jan 01 11:20PM -0800 On 12/29/2018 2:30 AM, Mr Flibble wrote: > The Bible of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is correct > because it is so written in The Bible of the Church of the Flying > Spaghetti Monster This alien ship, rendered with math looks pretty real... http://funwithfractals.atspace.cc/ct_gf_explore/ct_alien_ship.html (not a image, it is rendered... can you run it?) Humm, start a new religion? lol. |
| Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Jan 02 09:21AM -0800 On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 10:57:50 AM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > Jesus commanded us against sin. Homosexuality is a sin. On the other hand, Luke 17:34-35 suggests that homosexuality is not a factor in who would be chosen, and who not: "I tell you, in that night, there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left. Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left." Luke 17:34-35, KJV Daniel |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 02 12:51PM -0500 On 1/2/2019 12:21 PM, Daniel wrote: > the one shall be taken, and the other left." > Luke 17:34-35, KJV > Daniel These passages are not referring to a homosexual relationship. You have to look to how scripture backs up scripture. One verse can be taken to mean a particular thing when it really does not. That's actually how many cults begin. People look at one small portion of the Bible and conclude an entire offshoot/branch of religion around it. Seek the truth, Daniel. Don't just be a joker / mocker. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Jan 02 10:20AM -0800 On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 12:49:47 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > Luke 17:34-35, KJV > > Daniel > These passages are not referring to a homosexual relationship. Rick, you're not qualified to have an opinion on this subject, as you know no Greek or Aemenic, and are unschooled in the meaning of the texts. I believe the opinion expressed below is not a particularly radical one: https://redeeminggod.com/two-men-in-one-bed-luke_17_34/ It's consistent with the broad theme of Christianity - a movement away from ancient Judaic law, and towards the Judaic idea of "do unto others..." I don't think it's an accident that the societies that have embraced women's rights and gay rights and have accepted atheism have largely had Christian heritages. Best regards, Daniel |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 02 10:52AM -0800 On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 1:20:16 PM UTC-5, Daniel wrote: > Rick, you're not qualified to have an opinion on this subject, > as you know no Greek or Aemenic, and are unschooled in the meaning > of the texts. There are people who are experts in the languages of the Bible, and they have already done the research: https://biblehub.com/lexicon/luke/17-34.htm https://biblehub.com/text/luke/17-34.htm https://biblehub.com/greek/2825.htm The definition of Strong's #2825 is: kline: a couch, bed, mat, bier Original Word: κλίνη, ης, ἡ Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine Transliteration: kline Phonetic Spelling: (klee'-nay) Definition: a small couch Usage: a couch, bed, portable bed or mat, a couch for reclining at meals, possibly also a bier. You have to do more research, Daniel. Here's Young's Literal Translation which the passage reads differently: https://biblehub.com/ylt/luke/17.htm 34 'I say to you, In that night, there shall be two men on one couch, the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left; 35 two women shall be grinding at the same place together, the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left; 36 two men shall be in the field, the one shall be taken, and the other left.' You should read this passage too, Daniel. It describes those who seek to pervert scripture for their own love of sin, and their acceptance of it: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Timothy+4%3A3-4&version=KJV 3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Jan 02 11:20AM -0800 On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 1:52:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left; > 36 two men shall be in the field, the one shall be taken, > and the other left.' The good news is that none of the above are inconsistent with Jeremy Myers' interpretation, https://redeeminggod.com/two-men-in-one-bed-luke_17_34/ Best regards, Daniel |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Jan 02 11:50AM -0800 On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 2:21:06 PM UTC-5, Daniel wrote: > > and the other left.' > The good news is that none of the above are inconsistent with Jeremy Myers' interpretation, > https://redeeminggod.com/two-men-in-one-bed-luke_17_34/ If you only look at Luke 17:34, correct. If you look at the other verses in the Bible (New Testament) which condemn homosexuality, and re-affirm the Old Testament's condemnation of it (Jude 1:7), then you see the true meaning, and the true pattern. You're one of those people with itching ears, Daniel, who likes to hear what you want to hear rather than the truth. You're wil- ling to listen to fables because they align with what your heart wants to hear. Homosexuality is flatly condemned in the Bible: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+1%3A24%2C26-27%2CJude+7%2C1+Timothy+1%3A10%2C1+Corinthians+6%3A9%2CLeviticus+18%3A22-28%2CGenesis+19%3A5%2CEphesians+4%3A19%2CRomans+1%3A24%2CJudges+19%3A22%2C1+Thessalonians+4%3A5%2CRomans+1%3A28%2CJude+10%2CEphesians+5%3A12%2CDeuteronomy+23%3A17-18&version=KJV Passages in the New Testament: Romans 1:24,26-28 Jude 7, 10 1 Timothy 1:10 1 Corinthians 6:9 Ephesians 4:19 Romans 1:24 1 Thessalonians 4:5 Ephesians 5:12 In the Old Testament: Leviticus 18:22-28 Genesis 19:5 Judges 19:22 Deuteronomy 23:17-18 The terms used for homosexuality in the KJV are "abusers of themselves with mankind," "effeminate," and when it refers to knowing another man "carnally" or to "know" or "lie" with them (have sex with them, as in "Adam knew his wife, and she conceived"). Itching ears, Daniel ... wanting to hear what you want to hear, not what the truth is. The truth is given to men (from God, and through men and women like me) so that people can know the truth, repent of their sin, ask forgiveness, and receive the same, and be set free from judgment for their sin. The only people entering into Hell are those who will not turn from their sin, but cling to it despite the multiple calls of God throughout their life, the multiple attempts made to get a soul's attention, to say, "Look here! There's a warning! This life is not the end! Pay close attention! There's something more, and it is the true long-lasting form of our life!" -- Rick C. Hodgin |
| gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack): Jan 02 08:26PM In article <03b15571-2969-44c9-a840-12bdb396cf38@googlegroups.com>, Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote nothing of any value, as usual: ... You are so full of shit. -- "Everything Roy (aka, AU8YOG) touches turns to crap." --citizens of alt.obituaries-- |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 12:02PM -0800 Hello... You have to understand my work, i am also an "inventor" who has invented many "scalable" algorithms and there implementations in Delphi and FreePascal and C++ that scale on multicores and NUMA systems, here they are: - Scalable MLock - Scalable AMLock - Scalable SeqlockX - Many kind of Scalable RWLocks that are starvation-free - Scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that is starvation-free - Scalable Rwlocks that are starvation-free using scalable counting networks - Scalable Hashtable - Scalable Parallel Varfiler - Fully scalable Threadpool - Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references - Scalable FIFO queues both node-based and array-based You can find many of my scalable algorithms and there implementations in my following website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ About my next projects... My next project is that i will document and try to sell my following scalable algorithms and there implementations to Intel or Embarcadero or Microsoft or Google: - My enhanced version of my scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references - My fully scalable Threadpool engine - My Scalable FIFO queues both node-based and array-based So as you have noticed i am a an "inventor" that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations. You can find some of my scalable algorithms and there implementations here on my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ As you have noticed i am a white arab, i live in Quebec Canada since year 1989. Now if you ask me how i am making "money" so that to be able to live.. You have to understand my way of doing, I have gotten my Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics in 1988, it is not a college level diploma, my Diploma is a university level Diploma, it looks like an Associate degree or the french DEUG. Read here about the Associate degree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associate_degree And after i have gotten my Diploma , I have also succeeded one year of pure 'mathematics" at the university level of mathematics. So i have studied and succeeded 3 years at the university level.. Now after that i have come to Canada in year 1989 and i have started to study more software computing and to study network administration in Quebec Canada, and after that i have started to work as a network administrator for many years, after that around years 2001 and 2002 i have started to implement some of my softwares like PerlZip that looked like PkZip of PKware software company, but i have implemented it for Perl , and i have implemented the Dynamic Link Libraries of my PerlZip that permits to compress and decompress etc. with the "Delphi" compiler, so my PerlZip software product was very fast and very efficient, in year 2002 i have posted the Beta version on internet, and as a proof , please read about it here: http://computer-programming-forum.com/52-perl-modules/ea157f4a229fc720.htm And after that i have sold the release version of my PerlZip product to many many companies and to many individuals around the world, and i have even sold it to many Banks in Europe, and with that i have made more money. And after that i have started to work like a software developer consultant, the name of my company was and is CyberNT Communications, here it is: Here is my company in Quebec(Canada) called CyberNT Communications, i have worked as a software developer and as a network administrator, read the proof here: https://opencorporates.com/companies/ca_qc/2246777231 And more about the moral contract.. As you have noticed i am a white arab and i just written and posted here a new poem, i have also posted other of my poems , hope you have liked them, other than that you have to understand more my way of doing, i think that building the moral "contract" between me and others is something important, how do you think i am building it? my moral contract with others is like creating one of my "jobs" that has as a goal to convince the others that i am "useful" to society, not only that but i have to be "usefulness" that is more "sophisticated", so this is why you have seen me writing and posting in front of you my "poems", those poems have as a goal to show to others that i am capable of writing beautiful poems, so you are noticing my philosophy by reading my poems, i mean that showing that you are capable of writing beautiful poems is also my philosophy of life that has as a goal to build "confidence" between me and the others, since this confidence that i am building is also like a "glue" that connects me to others, so confidence is really important ! not only that but my moral contract that i am building has also as a goal to show that i am "useful" for the society, not only that but i want also to show that i am more "smart" and that i am more "sophisticated" ! this is all part of my moral contract between me and you that i am building, so as you are noticing i am in accordance with my words and i am more in accordance with morality that is perfection at best (as i have proved it), so as you are noticing that this perfection that we have to be is guided by the today "context" of the society and the context of our world, and by observing this "context" we notice that it needs more efficiency and more sophistication and more professionalism to be capable of "surviving" better and to be able to "transcend" our living conditions, so this is why i am not only writing beautiful poems and posting them here, but i am showing that i am more "professionalism" that is more technical, since i am a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, look for example at my Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library that scales very well here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library As you have noticed it says the following: "Sparse linear system solvers are ubiquitous in high performance computing (HPC) and often are the most computational intensive parts in scientific computing codes etc." This is why i have "invented" my Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library that scales very well. Here is another scalable algorithm that i have "invented", read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references So as you are noticing i have "invented" many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and you will find some of them here on my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ There are other scalable algorithms and there implementations that i have also invented and that i will sell to the following software companies: Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero or to Intel. So as you are noticing "inventing" many scalable algorithms as i am doing is also building the moral contract between me and you and it is also like creating one of my jobs. Read the rest of my thought to understand better: More political philosophy now.. Why do you think i am here to talk to you ? I am a white arab who is building the moral contract between me and you so that to bring "confidence" ! and i have talked about it in some parts of my political philosophy ! so i think that by reading my political philosophy you are feeling more what is the essence of morality ! i love it this way because it is responsability that brings more efficiency that is needed by our democracy ! so all in all as you are noticing i am here to be responsable ! now what about the moral contract ? step by step i am building and explaining my political philosophy to you, my moral contract with you is that i have also to explain that there is a necessary requirement for me, is that i have to know how to play it smartly like playing smartly a game of chess ! and when you are more smart you will have the tendency to know more quickly what is the best way to maximize your success ! this is why you are seeing me talking about the best way to maximize success ! for example you have to know that to be more smart you have to be able in morality to define what is the right "imperfections" that give you the right perfection ! you see ? that's very important to know ! because i am a more serious computer programmer and imperfections like "failing" to be able to be a success is part of a more serious computer programming ! if you are like a "purist" that doesn't want to fail at all in computer programming , that's not efficient ! this is the deficiency of neo-nazism and white supremacism ! they have to know how to be imperfections(it is like being failures) so that to be successful ! but neo-nazism and white supremacism are more like racial "purism" and this purism is inefficient as is inefficient socialism ! other than that we are today more efficient than before ! and democracy is more efficient than before because people are more educated and more experienced today and more aware today than before ! so they are becoming more efficient and this render democracy more efficient ! but can we ask ourselves the following question: is populism of today not in accordance with the fact that we are becoming more efficient ? i don't think this is a logical contradiction because democracy is adapting quickly to the realities and to the necessities of today ! and populism is also becoming more aware of all the advantages of globalization(see the study below that talks about it), so i think that democracy is getting more and more efficient because of that ! also i think that people are becoming more aware of the necessities that the legislative branch or power of the government has to know how to be moderation to avoid extremism that hurts the system ! this is getting better and better , so we have to be positive about politics ! and i think that even Donald Trump is adapting more quickly to the necessities of today. So all in all i think that you are understanding better my political philosophy, so read my following thoughts to understand better: The contrast of diversity.. I think that neo-nazism and white supremacism have a necessary requirement that is "order", also they want to be the right responsability because they want to be a "level" of perfection that is the right perfection for them, i am a white arab and i understand there requirements, but the problem with there philosophy is that it has difficiencies that must be corrected, first since i have proved that morality is perfection at best, and it is inherent to perfection at best that it must respect a certain decency and responsability that our civilization must be an "effort" that avoids at best "savagery", also we notice that the essence of our democracy is that we have to know how to be "moderation" in the legislative power so that to avoid extremism that causes violence and that hurts the system and that can cause a civil war, so i think that white supremacism and neo-nazism are constrained by the actual realities of politics and the necessities of today that i think don't accept neo-nazism and white supremacism because they are too much risk and they are too dangerous for the system, also i have noticed that neo-nazism and white supremacism are racial "purism" that is not what we call efficiency , because i have explained that optimization of today is "prioritizing" to be able to be successful, so if you look at the necessities of immigration of today is that with immigration we want to improve productivity and want to improve economic growth and want to improve the social system and also because of the low birth rate of many western countries, so i don't think that racial purism of neo=nazism and white supremacism is in accordance with morality that is perfection at best as i have proved it, also neo-nazism and white supremacism have the tendency to easily be hateful towards immigrants, but i don't think that this is the right way, because i think that we have first to be the right intellectual effort and be correct realism that permit us to be awareness and that permit us to be capable to think correctly and be capable of solving problems, and i don't think that it is the case of neo-nazism and white supremacism, so i think that neo-nazism and white supremacism have to be reformed to be in accordance with the right efficiency. And I have just released the new version of my Parallel archiver and my Parallel Compression Library, and the Zstandard Dynamic Link Libraries for Windows and the Zstandard Shared Libraries for Linux were updated to the newer versions. You can download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver And from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-compression-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 08:29AM -0800 Hello... Read again, more precision again: I have just looked at the following Scalable hash map: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lock-free/qCYGGkrwbcA As you can read that its cost of read transaction (find operation) is about 30 cycles, this is what makes it interesting. But you have to know that i have "invented" the following scalable algorithms and there implementations, read about them: "LW_Asym_RWLockX that is a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does spin-wait, and my Asym_RWLockX, a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does not spin-wait, but waits on my SemaMonitor, so it is energy efficient." You can download them from my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library And as you have noticed since my scalable algorithms above are costless in the reader side , so i will use them in my following scalable parallel hashtable to make it scalable and costless in the reader side of my scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-hashlist And i will use them inside my following scalable Parallel Varfiler to make it scalable and costless in the reader side of my scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler And I just "enhanced" my Scalable Parallel Varfiler benchmarks, please run the following multicore benchmark for my scalable Parallel Varfiler called "test3.exe" that you will find inside the zip file , you can download the zip file from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-varfiler-benchmarks And you can download my Scalable Parallel Varfiler from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 08:00AM -0800 Hello... I have just looked at the following Scalable hash map: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lock-free/qCYGGkrwbcA As you can read that its cost of read transaction (find operation) is about 30 cycles, this is what makes it interesting. But you have to know that i have "invented" the following scalable algorithms and there implementations, read about them: "LW_Asym_RWLockX that is a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does spin-wait, and my Asym_RWLockX, a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does not spin-wait, but waits on my SemaMonitor, so it is energy efficient." You can download them from my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library And as you have noticed since my scalable algorithms above are costless in the reader side , so i will use them in my following scalable parallel hashtable to make it scalable and costless in the reader side: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-hashlist And i will use them inside my following scalable Parallel Varfiler to make it scalable and costless in the reader side: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler And I just "enhanced" my Scalable Parallel Varfiler benchmarks, please run the following multicore benchmark for my scalable Parallel Varfiler called "test3.exe" that you will find inside the zip file , you can download the zip file from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-varfiler-benchmarks And you can download my Scalable Parallel Varfiler from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| queequeg@trust.no1 (Queequeg): Jan 02 12:43PM > No need to reply (if you do I will add you to my spam filter). Which would be the best thing you could do for this group, instead of contributing to the noise. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lSzL1DqQn0 |
| woodbrian77@gmail.com: Jan 01 07:55PM -0800 > Thanks, that worked. > Building the original version takes 6.4 seconds. The latest > version takes 2.2 seconds. I'm trying to get something going as far as continuous integration on github. A while back I tried codeship or something like that. Now I'm trying circleci. Does anyone have a config.yml file that works for a C++ repo? My config.yml is from their website: version: 2 jobs: build: docker: - image: circleci/ruby:2.4.1 steps: - checkout - run: echo "A first hello" ------------- Or maybe there's another company that has better C++ support? Thanks. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises http://webEbenezer.net |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment