Monday, January 21, 2019

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 19 updates in 12 topics

Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 13 08:14PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 13 08:14PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 14 10:09PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 14 10:08PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 14 10:09PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 21 08:53AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 21 08:53AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 21 08:53AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 20 12:44PM -0800

Hello...
 
 
Here is some of my new thoughts of my political philosophy, i have
extended them, and this was my last post on politics and poetry..
 
About the essence of: socialism and communism and neo-nazism..
 
It is like doing political philosophy, and we will start it
by asking the following questions:
 
What is the essence of communism ?
 
And what is the essence of socialism ?
 
And what is the essence of neo-nazism ?
 
We have to be more smart to answer those questions, and
we have to prioritize by also giving weights of importance so that to be
able to be successful !
 
I think the essence of communism comes from the fact that communism
has noticed that humans are not equal and are "egoism" and this is the
most problematic thing for communism ! communism today is like being too
much purism of morality, i mean that communism wants to make humans
"much" more equal and "much" less egoism, but is it corruption of
morality ? as i have defined it, morality is about perfectioning humans
and humanity towards absolute perfection, and to be more correct
abstraction i have defined morality as being: perfection at best, and i
have defined more the "at best" of perfection at best (read below) , so
now if we think communism in the current "context" of today, so
communism is corruption of morality , since communism is not correct
pragmatism that takes correctly into account the "constraints" so that
to be successful ! (read my thoughts below to notice it), this is
why communism is not correct morality in today "context".
 
neo-nazism is like too much purism of morality that is not in accordance
with morality, this too much purism of morality of neo-nazism doesn't
take into account correctly the contraints of today world, so neo-nazism
is not correct morality, please read all my below thoughts to understand:
 
More about communism and socialism..
 
I think that big debt and rising deficit of the government can be solved
more efficiently by reducing the "size" of the government and by making
the government more efficient and more efficient at "spending".
I think this is another problem of communism and communism of China,
because communism needs a "big" and less "efficient" government,
and this can cause problems, and we are noticing that communism of China
today is getting into a big problem of debt resulting from
inefficiencies of the communist government.
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems
 
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/09/economy/china-economy-risks/index.html
 
But look at why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation
in Europe , look especially at the its optimization of the Government
size(that includes more efficiency of government spending):
 
The important characteristics of Switzerland are:
 
1. Rule of law
 
2. Optimization of the Government size
 
3. Regulatory efficiency
 
4. Open markets
 
 
Read more here:
 
https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand my views:
 
We have to be more smart about communism of China..
 
As you have noticed i said that democracy is more efficient in fighting
corruption, so i will give you an example, i said the following:
 
 
==
I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is
the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those
investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad
investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this
China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China,
here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video:
 
Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION?
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY
==
 
 
So here we are again at what we call "corruption", since how
can you be "confidence" with communism ? i mean that communism
of China says that it has also to "help" other third world countries and
such because it is communism that wants much more "equality", and this
can bring problems and inefficiencies, because communism can help others
by economically investing in other third world countries even if the
economic investments is inefficient because communism want to be much
more equality, and i think that this is what happened to communism
of China(look at the video above to notice it), and this can
be called corruption.
 
 
Read all the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
 
About socialism..
 
I think that there is a real "impact" of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
Now about communism..
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
I will try to answer this question:
 
First you have to read my thoughts of my political philosophy
below to understand more my thoughts and to understand that
an acceptable abstraction is also that i am defining
morality as perfection at best and i am defining more the "at best"
of perfection at best , please read my thoughts
of my political philosophy below to understand better.
 
Now comes the very important question:
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
Is for example communism of China acceptable ?
 
So since as i have defined morality below that it is
perfection at best, so you have to notice that communism of China
has to "survive" to be able to be acceptable, so i think
the main advantage of communism of China is the capacity of China
that is its big population and also its quality
of smartness and its level of perfection, and i think that this is the
main advantage that makes communism of China be able to survive,
now since communism of China is more "apt" to survive, so the next
smart question is what is the nest very important thing
to notice about communism of China ? i think
communism of China is judging that its people has
to be more "controlled" by morality so that
to make successful morality, and since as i have
defined it , morality is perfection at best,
so we understand that morality is about perfectioning
and about perfection, this is the goal of morality, it is
to "perfect" and to perfect people, and this is why i think that even
though that the act of communism of China that is to control more
the people than the West to make them more perfect can be viewed as
extremism by the West, i think that morality
that is perfection at best can consider and define this act of communism
of China of controlling more the people to make them more "perfect"
as an act that is more "acceptable" by morality that is perfection at
best,but i think communism of China has a weakness that it is not as
efficient
as democracies of the West at fighting "corruption".
 
And I think that debt rising deficit resulting can be solved more
efficiently by reducing the "size" of the government and by
making the government more efficient and more efficient at "spending".
I think this is another problem of communism and communism of China,
because communism needs a "big" and less "efficient" government,
and can cause problems, and we are noticing that communism of China
today is getting into a big problem of debt resulting from
inefficiencies of the communist government.
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems
 
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/09/economy/china-economy-risks/index.html
 
And i think there is another problem of socialism and socialism of
China, and that is the following:
 
I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
 
So now comes the next question:
 
Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanistic or more tolerance, but it is acceptable.
 
And to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?
 
A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.
 
But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read below what i am saying about Capitalism and
egoism and you will notice that we have not to be pessimistic. But there
is still an important thing to talk about , and that is the fact that we
have to "analyze" and "evaluate" correctly the "realities" of our
democracies more correctly , and we have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read below my
thoughts of my political philosophy to understand better.
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
better:
 
My political philosophy..
 
As promised, and so that you understand my previous poem,
here is many of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read them all to
understand my thoughts:
 
About my thoughts..
 
As you are noticing in my following thoughts of my political philosophy
that i am also talking economy and talking about economies of some
countries such as Russia and France and Dubai etc. i am choosing
"carefully" those countries to be able to talk about some important
things that we have to know about macroeconomics and that we have to
apply to be more efficient, please reread all my following thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand more:
 
In the Protestant work ethic, the first to justify, theologically and
morally, the idea of work for the job, The ardor at work being defined
as the confirmation of personal salvation. By rendering obsolete the
previous social and theological schemes in which the pursuit of profit
was contrary to the ideals of salvation and charity, the Protestant
ethic favored the great deployment of utilitarian and instrumental
logics. In short, the idea that capitalism is "natural" would be, above
all, a sociohistoric construction.
 
And notice that Utilitarianism is an ethical and philosophical theory
that states that the best action is the one that maximizes utility,
which is usually defined as that which produces the greatest well-being
of the greatest number of people
 
So as you are noticing that the Protestant work ethic was not so
realistic, because i think it was based too much on Utilitarianism, so i
think it was a kind of extremism, so as you are noticing that the
capitalism philosophy does build also a lot over race for profit and
over Utilitarianism too, so this can lead to problems if it gets too
extremistic , that means it gets on too much Utilitarianism and too
much race of profit that can cause problems to society and to humanity,
such as the "envirenmental" problems that we face today, so we have to
be careful and be responsable, but we have not to be pessimistic about
capitalism, because we are more aware today and we are today perfecting
ourselves more efficiently to be more capable of transending this kind
of problems.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts:
 
I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Take for example the capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions
of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of
the means of production, the free market and the competition between
economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three
elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation
of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore,
at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however,
that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element,
being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit.
 
But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in
capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example
capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial
nationalism that is built on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this
egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past
has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be
pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 20 04:45PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
We have to be more smart about my posts..
 
 
Look at what responded to me David Brown and Chad, those are like
expert programmers, and i am more smart to notice that around year 2001
there was only experts type of programmers that were posting on
comp.programming and comp.programming.threads, and they were talking
more to each other, for example Dmitry Vyukov on
comp.programming.threads that was an expert on parallel programming and
synchronization algorithms was talking to more to experts in parallel
programming and synchronization algorithms like Chriss
Thomasson etc. so it was like experts talking to other experts on those
two forums, and there was almost no beginners talking on those two
forums, and around 2015 those experts have leaved those two forums, not
because of me, i think that they were no more writing on those two
forums but they were perhaps just looking from time to time to what was
written on those two forums, and around 2015 i have noticed that those
two forums became void from people, so i have decided to fill a little
bit this emptiness of those two forums by posting some posts of mine,
but you have to understand that i have done it because i have noticed
that those two forums were becoming almost empty or empty from posting,
but you have to be sure that if i have noticed that those experts were
still
writing on those two forums, i will sure not behaved the way
i have behaved, here is also the way i have behaved
read my previous thoughts to understand:
 
I am a more rational type of person, and around year 2000 when
the newsgroups such as comp.programming and comp.programming.threads
were still alive, i was posting on them a little bit and from time to
time about programming and parallel programming, it was not spamming,
but around year 2015 i have noticed that those two forums became void
from people, and there was almost no one posting on those two forums,
and it was not because of me, i think it was because newsgroups were
becoming a very old thing or technology, this is why i have decided
around 2018 to post just some posts about politics and about poetry to
fill a little bit this emptiness of those two forums, and after posting
just some posts about
about politics and poetry, i have decided today to stop posting about
politics and poetry and i have decided to post on topic about
programming and parallel programming, that`s all.`
 
 
This is why i have responded the following:
 
 
I will post about two persons on comp.programming forum who has
said the following:
 
 
I wrote the following:
> This was my last post about politics and poetry
 
> From now on i will post about programming.
 
And Chad responded the following:
 
>States. If he gets annoyed with you spamming this group with off topic
>posts, well, I don't think he could pull your account. But I'm 99.9%
>sure that he does know someone that could.
 
And Elephant man responded to Chad the following:
 
>Horizon/Amine doesn't post by Google Groups so he just doesn't care. But
>you could tell your friend to filter his junk posts.
 
 
And i responded the following to Elephant man:
 
 
>other one that is posting here because newsgroups are becoming an "old"
>thing, so this is why i am posting some posts of mine to fill the void
> that we have here on this forum.
 
And Elephant man responded the following:
 
>So the last people who still read usenet are leaving it because of your
>stupid posts, brilliant.
 
And i responded to Elephant man the following:
 
===
 
You are again a stupid man, because notice that you wrote this:
 
"Horizon/Amine doesn't post by Google Groups so he just doesn't care"
 
You are lacking rationality because you are a stupid man, because
how are saying that: "so he just doesn't care", how can you be sure
that i just don't care ? because as you have noticed you have
not asked me so that you be sure of it, so as you are noticing , you are
lacking rationality because you are a stupid man.
 
You also responded:
> So the last people who still read usenet are leaving it because of your
> stupid posts, brilliant.
 
 
You are like stupid again, how are you sure that the last people who
still read usenet are leaving ? you are like a stupid man , because
how can you be sure that they are leaving, you are again lacking
rationality.
 
Also as you have noticed that globally i am just posting very "few"
posts everyday, and as you have noticed i have said that i am stopping
to post about politics and about poetry, and i will from now on post on
programming, so i don't think that i am a problem here on this forum.
===
 
 
 
So as you are noticing this has also to do with "rationality",
notice how Elephant man is not capable of rationality..
 
And here is what i said about more rationality in my thoughts of
political philosophy:
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have.
 
 
 
So as you are noticing from my above writing that Elephant man is
like stupid and less rational type of man.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.
 
 
So i think that from my writing above that the person that is called
Elephant man is like a stupid man and he is less rational.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 20 04:13PM -0800

On 1/20/2019 3:43 PM, David Brown wrote:> On 20/01/2019 22:33, Horizon68
wrote:
>>>> know someone
>>>> that could.
 
>>> Horizon/Amine doesn't post by Google Groups so he just doesn't
care. But
> easy and free. If anyone is interested in what you write, you'll earn
> money off it too. And then Usenet groups like this can return to being
> Usenet groups and not dumping grounds for your drivel.
 
You are lacking rationality..
 
 
I am a more rational type of person, and around year 2000 when
the newsgroups such as comp.programming and comp.programming.threads
were still alive, i was posting on them a little bit and from time to
time about programming and parallel programming, it was not spamming,
but around year 2015 i have noticed that those two forums became void
from people, and there was almost no one posting on those two forums,
and it was not because of me, i think it was because newsgroups were
becoming a very old thing or technology, this is why i have decided
around 2018 to post just some posts about politics and about poetry to
fill a little bit this emptiness of those two forums, and after posting
just some posts about
about politics and poetry, i have decided today to stop posting about
politics and poetry and i have decided to post on topic about
programming and parallel programming, that`s all.`
 
 
This is why i have responded the following:
 
 
I will post about two persons on comp.programming forum who has
said the following:
 
 
I wrote the following:
> This was my last post about politics and poetry
 
> From now on i will post about programming.
 
And Chad responded the following:
 
>States. If he gets annoyed with you spamming this group with off topic
>posts, well, I don't think he could pull your account. But I'm 99.9%
>sure that he does know someone that could.
 
And Elephant man responded to Chad the following:
 
>Horizon/Amine doesn't post by Google Groups so he just doesn't care. But
>you could tell your friend to filter his junk posts.
 
 
And i responded the following to Elephant man:
 
 
>other one that is posting here because newsgroups are becoming an "old"
>thing, so this is why i am posting some posts of mine to fill the void
> that we have here on this forum.
 
And Elephant man responded the following:
 
>So the last people who still read usenet are leaving it because of your
>stupid posts, brilliant.
 
And i responded to Elephant man the following:
 
===
 
You are again a stupid man, because notice that you wrote this:
 
"Horizon/Amine doesn't post by Google Groups so he just doesn't care"
 
You are lacking rationality because you are a stupid man, because
how are saying that: "so he just doesn't care", how can you be sure
that i just don't care ? because as you have noticed you have
not asked me so that you be sure of it, so as you are noticing , you are
lacking rationality because you are a stupid man.
 
You also responded:
> So the last people who still read usenet are leaving it because of your
> stupid posts, brilliant.
 
 
You are like stupid again, how are you sure that the last people who
still read usenet are leaving ? you are like a stupid man , because
how can you be sure that they are leaving, you are again lacking
rationality.
 
Also as you have noticed that globally i am just posting very "few"
posts everyday, and as you have noticed i have said that i am stopping
to post about politics and about poetry, and i will from now on post on
programming, so i don't think that i am a problem here on this forum.
===
 
 
 
So as you are noticing this has also to do with "rationality",
notice how Elephant man is not capable of rationality..
 
And here is what i said about more rationality in my thoughts of
political philosophy:
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have.
 
 
 
So as you are noticing from my above writing that Elephant man is
like stupid and less rational type of man.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.
 
 
So i think that from my writing above that the person that is called
Elephant man is like a stupid man and he is less rational.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 13 12:00PM -0800

Hello,
 
Read this:
 
 
An efficient Timer for Delphi and Freepascal
 
Description:
 
It's a timer enhanced by Amine Moulay Ramdane based on TSC Pentium
register that is portable to Windows and Linux and Mac OSX.
 
 
You can download it from my website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-timer-for-delphi-and-freepascal
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 13 11:52AM -0800

Hello..
 
 
A portable Timer for Delphi and Freepascal
 
Description:
 
It's a timer enhanced by Amine Moulay Ramdane based on TSC Pentium
register that is portable to Windows and Linux and Mac OSX.
 
 
You can download it from my website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-timer-for-delphi-and-freepascal
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 20 03:11PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
I will post about two persons on comp.programming forum who has
said the following:
 
 
I wrote the following:
> This was my last post about politics and poetry
 
> From now on i will post about programming.
 
And Chad responded the following:
 
>States. If he gets annoyed with you spamming this group with off topic
>posts, well, I don't think he could pull your account. But I'm 99.9%
>sure that he does know someone that could.
 
And Elephant man responded to Chad the following:
 
>Horizon/Amine doesn't post by Google Groups so he just doesn't care. But
>you could tell your friend to filter his junk posts.
 
 
And i responded the following to Elephant man:
 
 
>other one that is posting here because newsgroups are becoming an "old"
>thing, so this is why i am posting some posts of mine to fill the void
> that we have here on this forum.
 
And Elephant man responded the following:
 
>So the last people who still read usenet are leaving it because of your
>stupid posts, brilliant.
 
And i responded to Elephant man the following:
 
===
 
You are again a stupid man, because notice that you wrote this:
 
"Horizon/Amine doesn't post by Google Groups so he just doesn't care"
 
You are lacking rationality because you are a stupid man, because
how are saying that: "so he just doesn't care", how can you be sure
that i just don't care ? because as you have noticed you have
not asked me so that you be sure of it, so as you are noticing , you are
lacking rationality because you are a stupid man.
 
You also responded:
> So the last people who still read usenet are leaving it because of your
> stupid posts, brilliant.
 
 
You are like stupid again, how are you sure that the last people who
still read usenet are leaving ? you are like a stupid man , because
how can you be sure that they are leaving, you are again lacking
rationality.
 
Also as you have noticed that globally i am just posting very "few"
posts everyday, and as you have noticed i have said that i am stopping
to post about politics and about poetry, and i will from now on post on
programming, so i don't think that i am a problem here on this forum.
===
 
 
 
So as you are noticing this has also to do with "rationality",
notice how Elephant man is not capable of rationality..
 
And here is what i said about more rationality in my thoughts of
political philosophy:
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have.
 
 
 
So as you are noticing from my above writing that Elephant man is
like stupid and less rational type of man.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.
 
 
So i think that from my writing above that the person that is called
Elephant man is like a stupid man and he is less rational.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 14 01:27PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
My Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library that
scales very well was updated to version 1.74
 
Here is what i have enhanced:
 
The Solve() method is now thread-safe, so you can you call it from
multiple threads, everything else is thread-safe except for the
constructor , you have to call the constructor one time from a process
and use the object from multiple threads.
 
I think that my library is much more stable and fast and it works
on both Windows and Linux.
 
You can read about it and download it from my website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 14 11:51AM -0800

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
 
AI Will Create Millions More Jobs Than It Will Destroy. Here's How
 
Read more here:
 
https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/#sm.0000jl57td15saeevxu0p87884x2f
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 20 10:23AM -0800

Hello...
 
 
About my C++ synchronization objects library for Windows and Linux..
 
Here is what i have enhanced:
 
- My Scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex was enhanced, now you can
pass the number of reader threads to the constructor.
 
- And my SemaMonitor was enhanced, the wait() method returns true if it
is signaled and false if it is not.
 
- And also i have added a Mutex that works correctly.
 
Please read more about my C++ synchronization objects library on
my following website:
 
You can download my C++ synchronization objects library that i have
just updated from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 20 10:16AM -0800

Hello..
 
 
About memory models and sequential consistency:
 
As you have noticed i am working with x86 architecture..
 
Even though x86 gives up on sequential consistency, it's among the most
well-behaved architectures in terms of the crazy behaviors it allows.
Most other architectures implement even weaker memory models.
 
ARM memory model is notoriously underspecified, but is essentially a
form of weak ordering, which provides very few guarantees. Weak ordering
allows almost any operation to be reordered, which enables a variety of
hardware optimizations but is also a nightmare to program at the lowest
levels.
 
Read more here:
 
https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/memory-models.html
 
 
Memory Models: x86 is TSO, TSO is Good
 
Essentially, the conclusion is that x86 in practice implements the old
SPARC TSO memory model.
 
The big take-away from the talk for me is that it confirms the
observation made may times before that SPARC TSO seems to be the optimal
memory model. It is sufficiently understandable that programmers can
write correct code without having barriers everywhere. It is
sufficiently weak that you can build fast hardware implementation that
can scale to big machines.
 
Read more here:
 
https://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/1435
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 20 10:15AM -0800

Hello...
 
 
About C++ memory model and about Delphi and Freepascal..
 
The abstract machine in the C++98/C++03 specification is fundamentally
single-threaded. So it is not possible to write multi-threaded C++ code
that is "fully portable" with respect to the spec. The spec does not
even say anything about the atomicity of memory loads and stores or the
order in which loads and stores might happen.
 
Of course, you can write multi-threaded code in practice for particular
concrete systems – like pthreads or Windows. But there is no standard
way to write multi-threaded code for C++98/C++03.
 
The abstract machine in C++11 and above is multi-threaded by design. It
also has a well-defined memory model; that is, it says what the compiler
may and may not do when it comes to accessing memory.
 
The default mode for atomic loads/stores in C++11 and above is to
enforce sequential consistency. This just means all loads and stores
must be "as if" they happened in the order you wrote them within each
thread, while operations among threads can be interleaved however the
system likes. So the default behavior of atomics provides both atomicity
and ordering for loads and stores.
 
Now, on a modern CPU, ensuring sequential consistency can be expensive.
In particular, the compiler is likely to emit full-blown memory barriers
between every access here. But if your algorithm can tolerate
out-of-order loads and stores, you can use memory_order_relaxed.
 
So, bottom line. Mutexes are great, and C++11 standardizes them. But
sometimes for performance reasons you want lower-level primitives (e.g.,
the classic double-checked locking pattern). The new standard provides
high-level gadgets like mutexes and condition variables, and it also
provides low-level gadgets like atomic types and the various flavors of
memory barrier. So now you can write sophisticated, high-performance
concurrent routines entirely within the language specified by the
standard, and you can be certain your code will compile and run
unchanged on both today's systems and tomorrow's.
 
Although, unless you are an expert and working on some serious low-level
code, you should probably stick to mutexes and condition variables.
 
And now about Delphi and Freepascal(because as you have noticed i am
working with C++ and with Delphi and Freepascal)
 
As you have noticed i have invented many scalable algorithms and
there implementations, and they are now working on x86 architecture,
and even if Delphi and Freepascal have no memory model as the one of
C++11, i will soon make my scalable algorithms implementations in Delphi
and Freepascal and all my Delphi and Freepascal softwares "portable" by
first using a portable CLH lock that i will write in C and using it from
Delphi and Freepascal and second by using the functions of TInterlocked
class of Delphi and correspondent functions in Freepascal, and after
that all my Delphi and Freepascal projects will become portable on other
architectures than x86, and thus my Delphi and Freepascal scalable
algorithms implementations and all my Delphi and Freepascal softwares
will permit Delphi and Freepascal to become really much more capable and
powerful.
 
Here is my scalable algorithms that i have invented that i will make
portable:
 
- Scalable MLock
- Scalable AMLock
- Scalable SeqlockX
- Many kind of Scalable RWLocks that are starvation-free
- Scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that is starvation-free
- Scalable Rwlocks that are starvation-free using scalable counting networks
- Scalable Hashtable
- Scalable Parallel Varfiler
- Fully scalable Threadpool
- Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references
- Scalable FIFO queues both node-based and array-based
- ParallelFor() that scales very well.
 
You can find many of my scalable algorithms and there implementations
in C++ and Delphi and Freepascal on my following website:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)