Thursday, January 17, 2019

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 7 topics

Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 16 09:34PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:45AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:45AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:45AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:45AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:45AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 16 05:57PM -0800

Hello,,
 
Read this:
 
 
 
We have to be more smart about communism of China..
 
As you have noticed i said that democracy is more efficient in fighting
corruption, so i will give you an example, i said the following:
 
 
==
I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is
the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those
investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad
investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this
China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China,
here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video:
 
Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION?
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY
==
 
 
So here we are again at what we call "corruption", since how
can you be "confidence" with communism ? i mean that communism
of China says that it has also to "help" other third world countries and
such because it is communism that wants much more "equality", and this
can bring problems and inefficiencies, because communism can help others
by economically investing in other third world countries even if the
economic investments is inefficient because communism want to be much
more equality, and i think that this is what happened to communism
of China(look at the video above to notice it), and this can
be called corruption.
 
 
Read all the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
 
About socialism..
 
I think that there is a real "impact" of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
Now about communism..
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
I will try to answer this question:
 
First you have to read my thoughts of my political philosophy
below to understand more my thoughts and to understand that
an acceptable abstraction is also that i am defining
morality as perfection at best and i am defining more the "at best"
of perfection at best , please read my thoughts
of my political philosophy below to understand better.
 
Now comes the very important question:
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
Is for example communism of China acceptable ?
 
So since as i have defined morality below that it is
perfection at best, so you have to notice that communism of China
has to "survive" to be able to be acceptable, so i think
the main advantage of communism of China is the capacity of China
that is its big population and also its quality
of smartness and its level of perfection, and i think that this is the
main advantage that makes communism of China be able to survive,
now since communism of China is more "apt" to survive, so the next
smart question is what is the nest very important thing
to notice about communism of China ? i think
communism of China is judging that its people has
to be more "controlled" by morality so that
to make successful morality, and since as i have
defined it , morality is perfection at best,
so we understand that morality is about perfectionning
and about perfection, this is the goal of morality, it is
to "perfect" and to perfect people, and this is why i think that even
though that the act of communism of China that is to control more
the people than the West to make them more perfect can be viewed as
extremism by the West, i think that morality
that is perfection at best can consider and define this act of communism
of China of controlling more the people to make them more "perfect"
as an act that is more "acceptable" by morality that is perfection at
best,but i think communism of China has a weakness that it is not as
efficient
as democracies of the West at fighting "corruption".
 
So now comes the next question:
 
Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanist or more tolerance, but it is acceptable.
 
And to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?
 
A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.
 
But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read below what i am saying about Capitalism and
egoism and you will notice that we have not to be pessimistic. But there
is still an important thing to talk about , and that is the fact that we
have to "analyze" and "evaluate" correctly the "realities" of our
democracies more correctly , and we have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read below my
thoughts of my political philosophy to understand better.
 
And i think there is another problem of socialism and socialism of
China, and that is the following:
 
I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
better:
 
My political philosophy..
 
As promised, and so that you understand my previous poem,
here is many of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read them all to
understand my thoughts:
 
About my thoughts..
 
As you are noticing in my following thoughts of my political philosophy
that i am also talking economy and talking about economies of some
countries such as Russia and France and Dubai etc. i am choosing
"carefully" those countries to be able to talk about some important
things that we have to know about macroeconomics and that we have to
apply to be more efficient, please reread all my following thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand more:
 
In the Protestant work ethic, the first to justify, theologically and
morally, the idea of work for the job, The ardor at work being defined
as the confirmation of personal salvation. By rendering obsolete the
previous social and theological schemes in which the pursuit of profit
was contrary to the ideals of salvation and charity, the Protestant
ethic favored the great deployment of utilitarian and instrumental
logics. In short, the idea that capitalism is "natural" would be, above
all, a sociohistoric construction.
 
And notice that Utilitarianism is an ethical and philosophical theory
that states that the best action is the one that maximizes utility,
which is usually defined as that which produces the greatest well-being
of the greatest number of people
 
So as you are noticing that the Protestant work ethic was not so
realistic, because i think it was based too much on Utilitarianism, so i
think it was a kind of extremism, so as you are noticing that the
capitalism philosophy does build also a lot over race for profit and
over Utilitarianism too, so this can lead to problems if it gets too
extremistic , that means it gets on too much Utilitarianism and too
much race of profit that can cause problems to society and to humanity,
such as the "envirenmental" problems that we face today, so we have to
be careful and be responsable, but we have not to be pessimistic about
capitalism, because we are more aware today and we are today perfecting
ourselves more efficiently to be more capable of transending this kind
of problems.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts:
 
I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Take for example the capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions
of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of
the means of production, the free market and the competition between
economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three
elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation
of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore,
at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however,
that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element,
being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit.
 
But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in
capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example
capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial
nationalism that is built on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this
egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past
has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be
pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i don't think so because
egoism is constrained by the consumer confidence index that we have
to higher globally and is constrained by the fact that we have
to give the necessary wages to others locally and around the world so
that to be able for others to "buy" our products, like has done it
Fordism, and notice also that today we are economically investing in
many third world countries because of there higher economical growth ,
so this is getting better and better, so we have not to be pessimistic,
and notice that the other criticism I make on the far right political
parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just
bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following:
 
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
 
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
 
For proof, read the following document:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
 
 
And about U.S. multinationals..
 
 
I said yesterday the following:
 
==
 
About our world..
 
I have studied operational research, and you have to understand
a very important thing, you have to understand that science
and technology and economy have to follow some rules
of logistics in operational research, this is the deficiency
of neo-nazism and such violent ideologies, they are not
understanding the game of today that needs logistics
to be more successful, so the world has changed and neo-nazism
is not understanding this changing, changes such as you are seeing USA
companies coming to Morocco my country such as the following(this is
also following rules of logistics):
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, here is US Companies Operating in Morocco:
 
http://heymorocco.com/american-companies-in-morocco.aspx
 
 
I think DXC Technology was not on the list, here it is:
 
Look at the following video about DXC Technology in Morocco:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ_MyKQ-250
 
 
Read about DXC Technology here:
 
http://www.dxc.technology/
 
 
So as you are noticing USA is also understanding that we have to know
how to work together to be more efficient ! this is why it is working
and investing in other countries such as Morocco !
 
So i think we have to be more optimistic about USA..
 
===
 
 
Read the following to understand more about U.S. multinationals:
 
 
• The worldwide operations of U.S. multinationals are highly
concentrated in America in their U.S. parents, not abroad in their
foreign affiliates. The idea that U.S. multinationals have somehow
"abandoned" the United States is not supported by the facts. They
maintain a large presence in America, both relative to the
overall U.S. economy and relative to the size of their foreign affiliates.
 
• International engagement drives the overall strength of U.S.
multinational companies. Although the United States is still the world's
largest single-country market, in the past generation it has been a
slow-growth market compared with much of the world. Even with today's
worldwide recession, this means that the overall strength of U.S.
multinationals is increasingly tied to their success in both America and
abroad. It also means that viewing the domestic and foreign operations
of U.S.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 16 04:52PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
About socialism..
 
I think that there is a real "impact" of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
Now about communism..
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
I will try to answer this question:
 
First you have to read my thoughts of my political philosophy
below to understand more my thoughts and to understand that
an acceptable abstraction is also that i am defining
morality as perfection at best and i am defining more the "at best"
of perfection at best , please read my thoughts
of my political philosophy below to understand better.
 
Now comes the very important question:
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
Is for example communism of China acceptable ?
 
So since as i have defined morality below that it is
perfection at best, so you have to notice that communism of China
has to "survive" to be able to be acceptable, so i think
the main advantage of communism of China is the capacity of China
that is its big population and also its quality
of smartness and its level of perfection, and i think that this is the
main advantage that makes communism of China be able to survive,
now since communism of China is more "apt" to survive, so the next
smart question is what is the nest very important thing
to notice about communism of China ? i think
communism of China is judging that its people has
to be more "controlled" by morality so that
to make successful morality, and since as i have
defined it , morality is perfection at best,
so we understand that morality is about perfectionning
and about perfection, this is the goal of morality, it is
to "perfect" and to perfect people, and this is why i think that even
though that the act of communism of China that is to control more
the people than the West to make them more perfect can be viewed as
extremism by the West, i think that morality
that is perfection at best can consider and define this act of communism
of China of controlling more the people to make them more "perfect"
as an act that is more "acceptable" by morality that is perfection at
best,but i think communism of China has a weakness that it is not as
efficient
as democracies of the West at fighting "corruption".
 
So now comes the next question:
 
Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanist or more tolerance, but it is acceptable.
 
And to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?
 
A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.
 
But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read below what i am saying about Capitalism and
egoism and you will notice that we have not to be pessimistic. But there
is still an important thing to talk about , and that is the fact that we
have to "analyze" and "evaluate" correctly the "realities" of our
democracies more correctly , and we have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read below my
thoughts of my political philosophy to understand better.
 
And i think there is another problem of socialism and socialism of
China, and that is the following:
 
I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
better:
 
My political philosophy..
 
As promised, and so that you understand my previous poem,
here is many of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read them all to
understand my thoughts:
 
About my thoughts..
 
As you are noticing in my following thoughts of my political philosophy
that i am also talking economy and talking about economies of some
countries such as Russia and France and Dubai etc. i am choosing
"carefully" those countries to be able to talk about some important
things that we have to know about macroeconomics and that we have to
apply to be more efficient, please reread all my following thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand more:
 
In the Protestant work ethic, the first to justify, theologically and
morally, the idea of work for the job, The ardor at work being defined
as the confirmation of personal salvation. By rendering obsolete the
previous social and theological schemes in which the pursuit of profit
was contrary to the ideals of salvation and charity, the Protestant
ethic favored the great deployment of utilitarian and instrumental
logics. In short, the idea that capitalism is "natural" would be, above
all, a sociohistoric construction.
 
And notice that Utilitarianism is an ethical and philosophical theory
that states that the best action is the one that maximizes utility,
which is usually defined as that which produces the greatest well-being
of the greatest number of people
 
So as you are noticing that the Protestant work ethic was not so
realistic, because i think it was based too much on Utilitarianism, so i
think it was a kind of extremism, so as you are noticing that the
capitalism philosophy does build also a lot over race for profit and
over Utilitarianism too, so this can lead to problems if it gets too
extremistic , that means it gets on too much Utilitarianism and too
much race of profit that can cause problems to society and to humanity,
such as the "envirenmental" problems that we face today, so we have to
be careful and be responsable, but we have not to be pessimistic about
capitalism, because we are more aware today and we are today perfecting
ourselves more efficiently to be more capable of transending this kind
of problems.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts:
 
I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Take for example the capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions
of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of
the means of production, the free market and the competition between
economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three
elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation
of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore,
at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however,
that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element,
being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit.
 
But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in
capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example
capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial
nationalism that is built on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this
egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past
has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be
pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i don't think so because
egoism is constrained by the consumer confidence index that we have
to higher globally and is constrained by the fact that we have
to give the necessary wages to others locally and around the world so
that to be able for others to "buy" our products, like has done it
Fordism, and notice also that today we are economically investing in
many third world countries because of there higher economical growth ,
so this is getting better and better, so we have not to be pessimistic,
and notice that the other criticism I make on the far right political
parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just
bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following:
 
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
 
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
 
For proof, read the following document:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
 
 
And about U.S. multinationals..
 
 
I said yesterday the following:
 
==
 
About our world..
 
I have studied operational research, and you have to understand
a very important thing, you have to understand that science
and technology and economy have to follow some rules
of logistics in operational research, this is the deficiency
of neo-nazism and such violent ideologies, they are not
understanding the game of today that needs logistics
to be more successful, so the world has changed and neo-nazism
is not understanding this changing, changes such as you are seeing USA
companies coming to Morocco my country such as the following(this is
also following rules of logistics):
 
I am a white arab from Morocco, here is US Companies Operating in Morocco:
 
http://heymorocco.com/american-companies-in-morocco.aspx
 
 
I think DXC Technology was not on the list, here it is:
 
Look at the following video about DXC Technology in Morocco:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ_MyKQ-250
 
 
Read about DXC Technology here:
 
http://www.dxc.technology/
 
 
So as you are noticing USA is also understanding that we have to know
how to work together to be more efficient ! this is why it is working
and investing in other countries such as Morocco !
 
So i think we have to be more optimistic about USA..
 
===
 
 
Read the following to understand more about U.S. multinationals:
 
 
• The worldwide operations of U.S. multinationals are highly
concentrated in America in their U.S. parents, not abroad in their
foreign affiliates. The idea that U.S. multinationals have somehow
"abandoned" the United States is not supported by the facts. They
maintain a large presence in America, both relative to the
overall U.S. economy and relative to the size of their foreign affiliates.
 
• International engagement drives the overall strength of U.S.
multinational companies. Although the United States is still the world's
largest single-country market, in the past generation it has been a
slow-growth market compared with much of the world. Even with today's
worldwide recession, this means that the overall strength of U.S.
multinationals is increasingly tied to their success in both America and
abroad. It also means that viewing the domestic and foreign operations
of U.S. multinationals as unrelated is increasingly incorrect. U.S.
multinationals must make strategic investment and employment decisions
from a truly global perspective, with links across all locations and
with dynamic variation in successful strategies both across
companies at a point in time and within companies over time.
 
• Foreign-affiliate activity tends to complement, not substitute for,
key parent activities in the United States such as employment, worker
compensation, and capital investment. Being globally engaged requires
U.S. multinationals to establish operations abroad and also to expand
and integrate these foreign activities with their U.S. parents. The idea
that global expansion tends to "hollow out" U.S. operations is
incorrect. Rather, the scale and scope of U.S. parent activities
increasingly depends on successful engagement abroad. Expansion by
U.S. parents and their affiliates contributes to the productivity and
average standard of living of all Americans.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.uscib.org/docs/foundation_multinationals.pdf
 
 
And read all my following thoughts about economy..
 
About Russia's economy...
 
Read this:
 
Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ?
 
The important characteristics of Switzerland are:
 
1. Rule of law
 
2. Optimization of the Government size
 
3. Regulatory efficiency
 
4. Open markets
 
 
Read more here:
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 16 04:21PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
Here is my new poem with more "philosophy"..
 
Is what you see is what you get ?
 
It is like doing philosophy, because it is the very basis
of philosophy and science, you have to know how to be more capable to
differentiate between the appearances and realities, between
the false and the truth and you have also to be able to see
more correctly what is beautifulness.. it is like the basis of
philosophy and science,look for example at my new poem below, it says that:
 
"Since life is sweetness of the untold"
 
 
This also like philosophy , because my poem is speaking
about an important thing that we notice today, and
it is also the goal of the arabic proverb that i am explaining below,
it is that we are looking at past history of white people
and saying that white people are not good , but
i don't think that this is correct thinking, because
we have like to be able to be "sweetness of the untold"
and we have also to be able to see beaututifulness more correctly,
it is like doing philosophy, this is why i am more "wise" and
more "mature" to see this "sweetness" and this "beautifulness",
this is why you are noticing that i have posted the arabic
proverb below, to make you understand that we have
to know how to be less complains of past history, because
past history was full of weaknesses and this is why it was
inferiority, so we have to know how to be sweetness of the untold,
i mean that we have to know how to complain less about past history
of white people, and this complaining less is also like sweetness
that you will be able to create , and i think our world needs
it to be less violence and less destructive. Other than that
in my new poem below i am also speaking about an important
thing that is nihilistic kind of philosophies by saying this:
 
I said in my following new poem the following:
 
"Because silence after death is also peace and the beautiful Dove
Since silence of death is also Love
But silence after patience is also the path
Because perfection is right."
 
 
Because that's inferred from what i have explained in my thoughts of
my political philosophy that i have posted previously, where i said that
patience of "silence after patience is also the path" of my poem
is also "patience" of "effort" necessary by "perfection" that we have
to be to attain more "advanced" perfection that permits us to be
happiness or absolute happiness, and i think we will attain it more
quickly because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating
returns, so we have to be this patience. This is why i wrote the
following in my political philosophy (and read my new poem below):
 
We have to be more precision and more smartness in political philosophy..
 
As you have noticed i said the following:
 
"Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanistic or more tolerance, but it is acceptable."
 
So to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?
 
A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.
 
But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read my thoughts of political philosophy about what i
am saying about Capitalism and egoism and you will notice that we have
not to be pessimistic. But there is still an important thing to talk
about , and that is the fact that we have to "analyze" and "evaluate"
correctly the "realities" of our democracies more correctly , and we
have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read my thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand better.
 
Also as you have noticed i said previously that:
 
There is an arab proverb that says in arabic:
 
"Laa taqoulou kaana abii, bal qoul haana da'"
 
And I translate it in english:
 
"Don't say my father was, but say that here i am"
 
This is also my philosophy, the meaning also of this arabic proverb is
that we have to be less complains about past history that was also
"full" of weaknesses, and we have today to construct a much more
enhanced system than past history systems. This is my philosophy in
life, this is why i must be more "professionalism" that knows more how
to think more efficiently, and this is why i am a more serious computer
programmer, and this is why i am thinking and writing political
philosophy and this is why i am thinking and writing my poems in front
of you, this is how i am constructing the one that i call "myself", it
is like the arab proverb above, because like in the proverb above, i am
saying "here i am" by showing that i am more capable.
 
 
And here is my new poem:
 
 
Coming in from the old
 
Where we were bought and sold like slaves
 
Since life is not only what we are told
 
Since life is saying wait and behold
 
Since life is sweetness of the untold
 
Since life is making it new and old
 
Since life is also coming from above
 
So one word
 
So two words
 
So three words
 
So many words
 
To avoid the hate
 
To avoid the sword
 
Because it is also one world
 
Because it is as if it is from Lord
 
Because it is wisdom from the new and the old
 
Because it is like the light of angels from above
 
Because silence after death is also peace and the beautiful Dove
 
Since silence of death is also Love
 
But silence after patience is also the path
 
Since perfection is right.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 16 04:06PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
About memory models and sequential consistency:
 
As you have noticed i am working with x86 architecture..
 
Even though x86 gives up on sequential consistency, it's among the most
well-behaved architectures in terms of the crazy behaviors it allows.
Most other architectures implement even weaker memory models.
 
ARM memory model is notoriously underspecified, but is essentially a
form of weak ordering, which provides very few guarantees. Weak ordering
allows almost any operation to be reordered, which enables a variety of
hardware optimizations but is also a nightmare to program at the lowest
levels.
 
Read more here:
 
https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/memory-models.html
 
 
Memory Models: x86 is TSO, TSO is Good
 
Essentially, the conclusion is that x86 in practice implements the old
SPARC TSO memory model.
 
The big take-away from the talk for me is that it confirms the
observation made may times before that SPARC TSO seems to be the optimal
memory model. It is sufficiently understandable that programmers can
write correct code without having barriers everywhere. It is
sufficiently weak that you can build fast hardware implementation that
can scale to big machines.
 
Read more here:
 
https://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/1435
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 16 04:01PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
About C++ memory model and about Delphi and Freepascal..
 
The abstract machine in the C++98/C++03 specification is fundamentally
single-threaded. So it is not possible to write multi-threaded C++ code
that is "fully portable" with respect to the spec. The spec does not
even say anything about the atomicity of memory loads and stores or the
order in which loads and stores might happen.
 
Of course, you can write multi-threaded code in practice for particular
concrete systems – like pthreads or Windows. But there is no standard
way to write multi-threaded code for C++98/C++03.
 
The abstract machine in C++11 and above is multi-threaded by design. It
also has a well-defined memory model; that is, it says what the compiler
may and may not do when it comes to accessing memory.
 
The default mode for atomic loads/stores in C++11 and above is to
enforce sequential consistency. This just means all loads and stores
must be "as if" they happened in the order you wrote them within each
thread, while operations among threads can be interleaved however the
system likes. So the default behavior of atomics provides both atomicity
and ordering for loads and stores.
 
Now, on a modern CPU, ensuring sequential consistency can be expensive.
In particular, the compiler is likely to emit full-blown memory barriers
between every access here. But if your algorithm can tolerate
out-of-order loads and stores, you can use memory_order_relaxed.
 
So, bottom line. Mutexes are great, and C++11 standardizes them. But
sometimes for performance reasons you want lower-level primitives (e.g.,
the classic double-checked locking pattern). The new standard provides
high-level gadgets like mutexes and condition variables, and it also
provides low-level gadgets like atomic types and the various flavors of
memory barrier. So now you can write sophisticated, high-performance
concurrent routines entirely within the language specified by the
standard, and you can be certain your code will compile and run
unchanged on both today's systems and tomorrow's.
 
Although, unless you are an expert and working on some serious low-level
code, you should probably stick to mutexes and condition variables.
 
And now about Delphi and Freepascal(because as you have noticed i am
working with C++ and with Delphi and Freepascal)
 
As you have noticed i have invented many scalable algorithms and
there implementations, and they are now working on x86 architecture,
and even if Delphi and Freepascal have no memory model as the one of
C++11, i will soon make my scalable algorithms implementations in Delphi
and Freepascal and all my Delphi and Freepascal softwares "portable" by
first using a portable CLH lock that i will write in C and using it from
Delphi and Freepascal and second by using the functions of TInterlocked
class of Delphi and correspondent functions in Freepascal, and after
that all my Delphi and Freepascal projects will become portable on other
architectures than x86, and thus my Delphi and Freepascal scalable
algorithms implementations and all my Delphi and Freepascal softwares
will permit Delphi and Freepascal to become really much more capable and
powerful.
 
Here is my scalable algorithms that i have invented that i will make
portable:
 
- Scalable MLock
- Scalable AMLock
- Scalable SeqlockX
- Many kind of Scalable RWLocks that are starvation-free
- Scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that is starvation-free
- Scalable Rwlocks that are starvation-free using scalable counting networks
- Scalable Hashtable
- Scalable Parallel Varfiler
- Fully scalable Threadpool
- Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references
- Scalable FIFO queues both node-based and array-based
- ParallelFor() that scales very well.
 
You can find many of my scalable algorithms and there implementations
in C++ and Delphi and Freepascal on my following website:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 16 11:25AM -0800

Hello..
 
 
About my C++ synchronization objects library for Windows and Linux..
 
Here is what i have enhanced:
 
- My Scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex was enhanced, now you can
pass the number of reader threads to the constructor.
 
- And my SemaMonitor was enhanced, the wait() method returns true if it
is signaled and false if it is not.
 
- And also i have added a Mutex that works correctly.
 
Please read more about my C++ synchronization objects library on
my following website:
 
You can download my C++ synchronization objects library that i have
just updated from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)