- [Modération JNTP] Annulation de <q0h5ee$1rv$5@dont-email.me> - 13 Updates
- More of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
- I correct a last typo, read again.. - 1 Update
- I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy.. - 1 Update
- You have to understand my work - 1 Update
- About my "scalable" RWLocks.. - 1 Update
- Read again, more precision again - 1 Update
- More "precision" with a correction of a last typo - 1 Update
- I have just looked at the following Scalable hash map - 1 Update
- Carl Douglas ~ Kung Fu Fighting 1974 - 1 Update
- About my C++ synchronization objects library for Windows and Linux.. - 1 Update
- About a very important point about morality.. - 1 Update
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 09:29AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 09:29AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 03:03PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 03:03PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 03:03PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 07:03PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 07:03PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 07:03PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 07:03PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 09:07PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 10:32PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 02 10:44PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 03 11:54AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 04:15PM -0800 Hello.. Read this: More of my thoughts.. Here is one of my interesting post about: Can we travel back in time ? and about a philosophical problem, read it carefully: Can we travel back in time? Here is my thoughts that i have just wrote: It is a very interesting question that demands rationality and logical thinking to answer it ... To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the mathematical arithmetic series. An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something extra-ordinary in itself. Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question: Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the future time in which one arrives by the feet? I answer this in a more logical way: Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future, therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive characteristic. So there is no contradiction and therefore we can consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series. Here is one of my conclusion: If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris by airplane, and that another person swims and walk by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions, And if you travel to Paris by plane and you answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able to send an email quickly to the person who wants to to swim and walk to Paris and give him the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future, so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other mathematical inventions and others... Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic, so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into account the scientific and empirical evidence to be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the future.. If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice , and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE The future of the second person and will also live the future event of the second person, then those two theoretical and empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future will lead to the same certainty, and as a result the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future. Then you understand that I am also a Platonist, Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time machine that permits to travel in the future, you understand that it makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future. When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence. So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher Plato. It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the future. Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists, then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in fuzzy logic. Now about a philosophical problem.. I have explained with 2 + 2 = 4 that the "consciousness" is the "consequence" of "understanding", then once that you build a hierarchy of ideas and Logical relations and by also measure, then you will be able to understand mathematical equality Of 2 + 2 = 4, and once you understand that, at this very precise moment that you understand mathematical equality 2 + 2 = 4, then you will be ultimately conscious Of the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4, that is why I have said that the process of consciousness is much simpler than the process of intelligence in action, so I hope that my argumentation is clear. Now there remains something to be explained is that even if the process of intelligence in action has not been easy for humanity, the fact that a human being understands the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4, then this understanding will greatly reduce complexity and let us see the "truth" as it really is, a child who tries initially to understand the the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 will see this process as being "difficult", but is that really "truth"? I do not believe because the understanding of the essence of what is "truth" tells us that truth can only be reached when there is complete comprehension of a process or a thing, then the perception of the child who sees in the beginning of the process of understanding the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 as being "difficult" is not the truth, it is rather the perception of the one who understood "completely" the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 and which tells us that equality is easy which is the truth. I have spoken of the understanding of the very essence of what is the truth, for example, when you look at the door of a car, can you say that it's a car ? I do not think, it's who looks and understands everything that is Car that can say it's a car! do you understand ? Then, in my opinion, it can be inferred that it is understanding of a process or thing that greatly reduce or erase "complexity" and which reveals to us the truth, It is like this for the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 If a child in the beginning tries to understand this equality, he will say that the mathematical equality is "difficult", but is that the truth? I think no, because it's like the example of the car which I have just given you, it is once the understanding of equality is complete that it will greatly reduce or erase the "complexity" and will confirm that the equality is truly "easy", and This is the truth and that is the veridic perception and this is the very essence of truth. So if you have understood what I'm trying to explain, Is that we could say that mathematics is easy and simple, our universe is easy and simple and any thing or process is easy and simple, But it is because we are limited intellectually or physically that we do not understand it, i see this as in an axis of reality, i mean that the complexity of mathematics and knowledge of mathematics is 0.1 on a scale of 100, and we are still weaker at 0.001 on a scale of 100 , even though knowledge of the universe and mathematics is easy, we feel this as difficult. But my point of view is not complete, I will present my other reasoning: We can say, for example, that to define what a car is, we have to "understand" what a car is, then we can therefore affirm that the completeness of knowledge of the car brings us to understand in a perfect way what is a car .. now the important question in logic is: is it possible to state the same thing about the variable of the "complexity" of comprehension, that is to say: perfect knowledge leads us to understand the very nature of the complexity of knowledge, as in the case of the car i have just given you above, because it is the one who really knows the car who can define the car, can we say the same thing about the complexity of understanding? does it is the one who really knows knowledge that can say what is the complexity of the understanding of this knowledge? Do you understand my problem that use logic effectively to solve this problem? As in the problem of the car, above, what can we say about the heaviness or the size of the car which characterizes the car, we can say that it is the one who has knowledge about the car and who understands the car that can accurately state what the heaviness or the size of the car, but can we say the same thing about the characteristic which is called the "Complexity" of understanding? I mean that by analogy, if complexity is the characteristic of the size of the car and if comprehension is the understanding of the car, can we say the same thing and say that the completeness of understanding can be defined only when there is more complete understanding and that greatly reduce or erase complexity because when you understand more fully this leads us to say that understanding is easy? I think that to solve this problem it is necessary to look that in the case of the car, the size and the heaviness are not of the variables of the "comprehension" function, whereas in the case of complexity, comprehension is, on the other hand, a variable of the complexity of comprehension, so these are two different problems, so that the nature of the complexity of Comprehension is relative to comprehension, since comprehension is a variable of the complexity of comprehension, so the problem is better solved in this way and complexity should be seen as a function of comprehension, and more there is comprehension and more there is understand and more there is less complexity of understanding. And now here is i think my definitive proof and solution to this problem: As you noted in my second reasoning, I have concluded that understanding is a variable of complexity of understanding, for the more there is comprehension the more there is less complexity of understanding. The problem is not resolved as we can assert that understanding is the theoretical representation of the car example that i have given above, but since the more we understand theoretically the car, the more there is less complexity of understanding, so we can say that the theoretical representation of the understanding of the car system is easy, but this is not true because, first of all, there is a contradiction, since two theoretical systems, one which is more complex and another that is less complex system, can both become as easy when there is definitive understanding, and since the mechanism of awareness of the theoretical understanding of the understanding of the car system rely on the speed of our brain, that means that when you remember an understanding in your brain, the brain is quick in its computation to do it, and This rapidity of computation of the brain makes us see comprehension as easy, for example, when you look at an equality of 2 + 2 = 4, your brain has already understood this equality before when you were still a child, but when you look at this equality now, the brain brings back the understanding of this equality and it does so quickly , and this is what does our brain, you do not have to understand the equality yet again, no, the brain makes a quick computation and brings you back the understanding of this equality quickly, that's what makes it easy to understand the theoretical representation of the understanding of the car system, since the theoretical representation of the understanding of the system of a car is brought back quickly by the brain in the form of an understanding |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 02:43PM -0800 Hello, Read this: I correct a last typo, read again.. I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy.. Take for example the capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of the means of production, the free market and the competition between economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore, at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however, that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element, being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit. But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial nationalism that is build on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i don't think so because egoism is constrained by the consumer confidence index that we have to higher globally and is constrained by the fact that we have to give the necessary wages to others locally and around the world so that to be able for others to "buy" our products, like has done it Fordism, and notice also that today we are economically investing in many third world countries because of there higher economical growth , so this is getting better and better, so we have not to be pessimistic, and notice that the other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following: Offshoring increases demand for more workers "qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of order of about 10%, also according to some recent research the Offshoring of materials and services have both a positive and not negligible effect on productivity. When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 2006). For proof, read the following document: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm And about U.S. multinationals.. I said yesterday the following: == About our world.. I have studied operational research, and you have to understand a very important thing, you have to understand that science and technology and economy have to follow some rules of logistics in operational research, this is the deficiency of neo-nazism and such violent ideologies, they are not understanding the game of today that needs logistics to be more successful, so the world has changed and neo-nazism is not understanding this changing, changes such as you are seeing USA companies coming to Morocco my country such as the following(this is also following rules of logistics): I am a white arab from Morocco, here is US Companies Operating in Morocco: http://heymorocco.com/american-companies-in-morocco.aspx I think DXC Technology was not on the list, here it is: Look at the following video about DXC Technology in Morocco: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ_MyKQ-250 Read about DXC Technology here: http://www.dxc.technology/ So as you are noticing USA is also understanding that we have to know how to work together to be more efficient ! this is why it is working and investing in other countries such as Morocco ! So i think we have to be more optimistic about USA.. === Read the following to understand more about U.S. multinationals: • The worldwide operations of U.S. multinationals are highly concentrated in America in their U.S. parents, not abroad in their foreign affiliates. The idea that U.S. multinationals have somehow "abandoned" the United States is not supported by the facts. They maintain a large presence in America, both relative to the overall U.S. economy and relative to the size of their foreign affiliates. • International engagement drives the overall strength of U.S. multinational companies. Although the United States is still the world's largest single-country market, in the past generation it has been a slow-growth market compared with much of the world. Even with today's worldwide recession, this means that the overall strength of U.S. multinationals is increasingly tied to their success in both America and abroad. It also means that viewing the domestic and foreign operations of U.S. multinationals as unrelated is increasingly incorrect. U.S. multinationals must make strategic investment and employment decisions from a truly global perspective, with links across all locations and with dynamic variation in successful strategies both across companies at a point in time and within companies over time. • Foreign-affiliate activity tends to complement, not substitute for, key parent activities in the United States such as employment, worker compensation, and capital investment. Being globally engaged requires U.S. multinationals to establish operations abroad and also to expand and integrate these foreign activities with their U.S. parents. The idea that global expansion tends to "hollow out" U.S. operations is incorrect. Rather, the scale and scope of U.S. parent activities increasingly depends on successful engagement abroad. Expansion by U.S. parents and their affiliates contributes to the productivity and average standard of living of all Americans. Read more here: https://www.uscib.org/docs/foundation_multinationals.pdf And read all my following thoughts about economy.. About Russia's economy... Read this: Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ? The important characteristics of Switzerland are: 1. Rule of law 2. Optimization of the Government size 3. Regulatory efficiency 4. Open markets Read more here: https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/ So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong economy, read the following to notice it: "Russia's transition from a centrally planned economy to a more market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace. Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term economic development." Read more here: https://www.heritage.org/index/country/russia I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China, here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video: Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY And by analogy, because it is a risk that is dangerous, this risk that is dangerous look like the following risk when i said: == I said: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ == Still about economy and quality.. Why Doesn't DUBAI care about OIL? Dubai has done the following to diversify and make successful its economy and become rich: - Lower taxes - Special economic zones - High degree of immigration freedom - It has attracted more investment Look at this video to know more about DUBAI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEs1uOzt3KM Still about quality As you have noticed growth in France will lower the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption is also a way in economics to lower unemployment more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to build quality products and services like in Germany to be more competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality, because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in being more effective in economy and education France will attract more and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its challenges and I think it is able to meet them. Also I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators: First look at the growth of France here: "Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East - Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to decline, at a very measured pace . " and look also at this about France: According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy. Read more here to notice it: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the budget. Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do: I observed more closely the model of for example the French system, and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the public service in France is much more than that of England, so what can we also do in France to unlock economic growth and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces unemployment. I have to be more precise about USA: I said before on my previous post that: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ So reread my following thoughts: About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics.. I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts: Questions: What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics? Answer: At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy: Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he recommends doing the opposite. The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following: Offshoring increases demand for more workers "qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of order of about 10%, also according to some recent research the Offshoring of materials and services have both a positive and not negligible effect on productivity. When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 2006). For proof, read the following document: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm And about immigration now: Look at this following video about: Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS? You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also good for economic "growth". But please look |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 02:33PM -0800 Hello,, Read this: I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy.. Take for example to capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of the means of production, the free market and the competition between economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore, at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however, that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element, being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit. But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial nationalism that is build on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i don't think so because egoism is constrained by the consumer confidence index that we have to higher globally and is constrained by the fact that we have to give the necessary wages to others locally and around the world so that to be able for others to "buy" our products, like has done it Fordism, and notice also that today we are economically investing in many third world countries because of there higher economical growth , so this is getting better and better, so we have not to be pessimistic, and notice that the other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following: Offshoring increases demand for more workers "qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of order of about 10%, also according to some recent research the Offshoring of materials and services have both a positive and not negligible effect on productivity. When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 2006). For proof, read the following document: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm And about U.S. multinationals.. I said yesterday the following: == About our world.. I have studied operational research, and you have to understand a very important thing, you have to understand that science and technology and economy have to follow some rules of logistics in operational research, this is the deficiency of neo-nazism and such violent ideologies, they are not understanding the game of today that needs logistics to be more successful, so the world has changed and neo-nazism is not understanding this changing, changes such as you are seeing USA companies coming to Morocco my country such as the following(this is also following rules of logistics): I am a white arab from Morocco, here is US Companies Operating in Morocco: http://heymorocco.com/american-companies-in-morocco.aspx I think DXC Technology was not on the list, here it is: Look at the following video about DXC Technology in Morocco: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ_MyKQ-250 Read about DXC Technology here: http://www.dxc.technology/ So as you are noticing USA is also understanding that we have to know how to work together to be more efficient ! this is why it is working and investing in other countries such as Morocco ! So i think we have to be more optimistic about USA.. === Read the following to understand more about U.S. multinationals: • The worldwide operations of U.S. multinationals are highly concentrated in America in their U.S. parents, not abroad in their foreign affiliates. The idea that U.S. multinationals have somehow "abandoned" the United States is not supported by the facts. They maintain a large presence in America, both relative to the overall U.S. economy and relative to the size of their foreign affiliates. • International engagement drives the overall strength of U.S. multinational companies. Although the United States is still the world's largest single-country market, in the past generation it has been a slow-growth market compared with much of the world. Even with today's worldwide recession, this means that the overall strength of U.S. multinationals is increasingly tied to their success in both America and abroad. It also means that viewing the domestic and foreign operations of U.S. multinationals as unrelated is increasingly incorrect. U.S. multinationals must make strategic investment and employment decisions from a truly global perspective, with links across all locations and with dynamic variation in successful strategies both across companies at a point in time and within companies over time. • Foreign-affiliate activity tends to complement, not substitute for, key parent activities in the United States such as employment, worker compensation, and capital investment. Being globally engaged requires U.S. multinationals to establish operations abroad and also to expand and integrate these foreign activities with their U.S. parents. The idea that global expansion tends to "hollow out" U.S. operations is incorrect. Rather, the scale and scope of U.S. parent activities increasingly depends on successful engagement abroad. Expansion by U.S. parents and their affiliates contributes to the productivity and average standard of living of all Americans. Read more here: https://www.uscib.org/docs/foundation_multinationals.pdf And read all my following thoughts about economy.. About Russia's economy... Read this: Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ? The important characteristics of Switzerland are: 1. Rule of law 2. Optimization of the Government size 3. Regulatory efficiency 4. Open markets Read more here: https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/ So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong economy, read the following to notice it: "Russia's transition from a centrally planned economy to a more market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace. Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term economic development." Read more here: https://www.heritage.org/index/country/russia I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China, here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video: Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY And by analogy, because it is a risk that is dangerous, this risk that is dangerous look like the following risk when i said: == I said: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ == Still about economy and quality.. Why Doesn't DUBAI care about OIL? Dubai has done the following to diversify and make successful its economy and become rich: - Lower taxes - Special economic zones - High degree of immigration freedom - It has attracted more investment Look at this video to know more about DUBAI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEs1uOzt3KM Still about quality As you have noticed growth in France will lower the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption is also a way in economics to lower unemployment more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to build quality products and services like in Germany to be more competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality, because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in being more effective in economy and education France will attract more and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its challenges and I think it is able to meet them. Also I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators: First look at the growth of France here: "Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East - Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to decline, at a very measured pace . " and look also at this about France: According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy. Read more here to notice it: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the budget. Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do: I observed more closely the model of for example the French system, and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the public service in France is much more than that of England, so what can we also do in France to unlock economic growth and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces unemployment. I have to be more precise about USA: I said before on my previous post that: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ So reread my following thoughts: About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics.. I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts: Questions: What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics? Answer: At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy: Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he recommends doing the opposite. The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following: Offshoring increases demand for more workers "qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of order of about 10%, also according to some recent research the Offshoring of materials and services have both a positive and not negligible effect on productivity. When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 2006). For proof, read the following document: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm And about immigration now: Look at this following video about: Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS? You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also good for economic "growth". But please look carefully at the following video to |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 12:00PM -0800 Hello.. You have to understand my work, i am also an "inventor" who has invented many "scalable" algorithms and there implementations in Delphi and FreePascal and C++ that scale on multicores and NUMA systems, here they are: - Scalable MLock - Scalable AMLock - Scalable SeqlockX - Many kind of Scalable RWLocks that are starvation-free - Scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that is starvation-free - Scalable Rwlocks that are starvation-free using scalable counting networks - Scalable Hashtable - Scalable Parallel Varfiler - Fully scalable Threadpool - Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references - Scalable FIFO queues both node-based and array-based You can find many of my scalable algorithms and there implementations in my following website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ About my next projects... My next project is that i will document and try to sell my following scalable algorithms and there implementations to Intel or Embarcadero or Microsoft or Google: - My enhanced version of my scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references - My fully scalable Threadpool engine - My Scalable FIFO queues both node-based and array-based So as you have noticed i am a an "inventor" that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations. You can find some of my scalable algorithms and there implementations here on my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ As you have noticed i am a white arab, i live in Quebec Canada since year 1989. Now if you ask me how i am making "money" so that to be able to live.. You have to understand my way of doing, I have gotten my Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics in 1988, it is not a college level diploma, my Diploma is a university level Diploma, it looks like an Associate degree or the french DEUG. Read here about the Associate degree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associate_degree And after i have gotten my Diploma , I have also succeeded one year of pure 'mathematics" at the university level of mathematics. So i have studied and succeeded 3 years at the university level.. Now after that i have come to Canada in year 1989 and i have started to study more software computing and to study network administration in Quebec Canada, and after that i have started to work as a network administrator for many years, after that around years 2001 and 2002 i have started to implement some of my softwares like PerlZip that looked like PkZip of PKware software company, but i have implemented it for Perl , and i have implemented the Dynamic Link Libraries of my PerlZip that permits to compress and decompress etc. with the "Delphi" compiler, so my PerlZip software product was very fast and very efficient, in year 2002 i have posted the Beta version on internet, and as a proof , please read about it here: http://computer-programming-forum.com/52-perl-modules/ea157f4a229fc720.htm And after that i have sold the release version of my PerlZip product to many many companies and to many individuals around the world, and i have even sold it to many Banks in Europe, and with that i have made more money. And after that i have started to work like a software developer consultant, the name of my company was and is CyberNT Communications, here it is: Here is my company in Quebec(Canada) called CyberNT Communications, i have worked as a software developer and as a network administrator, read the proof here: https://opencorporates.com/companies/ca_qc/2246777231 And more about the moral contract.. As you have noticed i am a white arab and i just written and posted here a new poem, i have also posted other of my poems , hope you have liked them, other than that you have to understand more my way of doing, i think that building the moral "contract" between me and others is something important, how do you think i am building it? my moral contract with others is like creating one of my "jobs" that has as a goal to convince the others that i am "useful" to society, not only that but i have to be "usefulness" that is more "sophisticated", so this is why you have seen me writing and posting in front of you my "poems", those poems have as a goal to show to others that i am capable of writing beautiful poems, so you are noticing my philosophy by reading my poems, i mean that showing that you are capable of writing beautiful poems is also my philosophy of life that has as a goal to build "confidence" between me and the others, since this confidence that i am building is also like a "glue" that connects me to others, so confidence is really important ! not only that but my moral contract that i am building has also as a goal to show that i am "useful" for the society, not only that but i want also to show that i am more "smart" and that i am more "sophisticated" ! this is all part of my moral contract between me and you that i am building, so as you are noticing i am in accordance with my words and i am more in accordance with morality that is perfection at best (as i have proved it), so as you are noticing that this perfection that we have to be is guided by the today "context" of the society and the context of our world, and by observing this "context" we notice that it needs more efficiency and more sophistication and more professionalism to be capable of "surviving" better and to be able to "transcend" our living conditions, so this is why i am not only writing beautiful poems and posting them here, but i am showing that i am more "professionalism" that is more technical, since i am a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, look for example at my Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library that scales very well here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library As you have noticed it says the following: "Sparse linear system solvers are ubiquitous in high performance computing (HPC) and often are the most computational intensive parts in scientific computing codes etc." This is why i have "invented" my Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library that scales very well. Here is another scalable algorithm that i have "invented", read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references So as you are noticing i have "invented" many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and you will find some of them here on my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ There are other scalable algorithms and there implementations that i have also invented and that i will sell to the following software companies: Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero or to Intel. So as you are noticing "inventing" many scalable algorithms as i am doing is also building the moral contract between me and you and it is also like creating one of my jobs. Read the rest of my thought to understand better: More political philosophy now.. Why do you think i am here to talk to you ? I am a white arab who is building the moral contract between me and you so that to bring "confidence" ! and i have talked about it in some parts of my political philosophy ! so i think that by reading my political philosophy you are feeling more what is the essence of morality ! i love it this way because it is responsability that brings more efficiency that is needed by our democracy ! so all in all as you are noticing i am here to be responsable ! now what about the moral contract ? step by step i am building and explaining my political philosophy to you, my moral contract with you is that i have also to explain that there is a necessary requirement for me, is that i have to know how to play it smartly like playing smartly a game of chess ! and when you are more smart you will have the tendency to know more quickly what is the best way to maximize your success ! this is why you are seeing me talking about the best way to maximize success ! for example you have to know that to be more smart you have to be able in morality to define what is the right "imperfections" that give you the right perfection ! you see ? that's very important to know ! because i am a more serious computer programmer and imperfections like "failing" to be able to be a success is part of a more serious computer programming ! if you are like a "purist" that doesn't want to fail at all in computer programming , that's not efficient ! this is the deficiency of neo-nazism and white supremacism ! they have to know how to be imperfections(it is like being failures) so that to be successful ! but neo-nazism and white supremacism are more like racial "purism" and this purism is inefficient as is inefficient socialism ! other than that we are today more efficient than before ! and democracy is more efficient than before because people are more educated and more experienced today and more aware today than before ! so they are becoming more efficient and this render democracy more efficient ! but can we ask ourselves the following question: is populism of today not in accordance with the fact that we are becoming more efficient ? i don't think this is a logical contradiction because democracy is adapting quickly to the realities and to the necessities of today ! and populism is also becoming more aware of all the advantages of globalization(see the study below that talks about it), so i think that democracy is getting more and more efficient because of that ! also i think that people are becoming more aware of the necessities that the legislative branch or power of the government has to know how to be moderation to avoid extremism that hurts the system ! this is getting better and better , so we have to be positive about politics ! and i think that even Donald Trump is adapting more quickly to the necessities of today. So all in all i think that you are understanding better my political philosophy, so read my following thoughts to understand better: The contrast of diversity.. I think that neo-nazism and white supremacism have a necessary requirement that is "order", also they want to be the right responsability because they want to be a "level" of perfection that is the right perfection for them, i am a white arab and i understand there requirements, but the problem with there philosophy is that it has difficiencies that must be corrected, first since i have proved that morality is perfection at best, and it is inherent to perfection at best that it must respect a certain decency and responsability that our civilization must be an "effort" that avoids at best "savagery", also we notice that the essence of our democracy is that we have to know how to be "moderation" in the legislative power so that to avoid extremism that causes violence and that hurts the system and that can cause a civil war, so i think that white supremacism and neo-nazism are constrained by the actual realities of politics and the necessities of today that i think don't accept neo-nazism and white supremacism because they are too much risk and they are too dangerous for the system, also i have noticed that neo-nazism and white supremacism are racial "purism" that is not what we call efficiency , because i have explained that optimization of today is "prioritizing" to be able to be successful, so if you look at the necessities of immigration of today is that with immigration we want to improve productivity and want to improve economic growth and want to improve the social system and also because of the low birth rate of many western countries, so i don't think that racial purism of neo=nazism and white supremacism is in accordance with morality that is perfection at best as i have proved it, also neo-nazism and white supremacism have the tendency to easily be hateful towards immigrants, but i don't think that this is the right way, because i think that we have first to be the right intellectual effort and be correct realism that permit us to be awareness and that permit us to be capable to think correctly and be capable of solving problems, and i don't think that it is the case of neo-nazism and white supremacism, so i think that neo-nazism and white supremacism have to be reformed to be in accordance with the right efficiency. And I have just released the new version of my Parallel archiver and my Parallel Compression Library, and the Zstandard Dynamic Link Libraries for Windows and the Zstandard Shared Libraries for Linux were updated to the newer versions. You can download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver And from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-compression-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 10:42AM -0800 Hello, Read this: About my "scalable" RWLocks.. Based on Intel and Micron's claim, 3D Xpoint is 1000x faster than NAND and 10x higher density than conventional memory (assume DRAM here). So latency of PCIe NAND is about 100us, and 1000x faster 3D Xpoint gives 100ns, which is 2 times slower than DRAM's speed of 50ns, so this makes my scalable RWLocks very useful for 3D Xpoint, so my scalable RWLocks are for example very useful for Optane SSD 900P that uses 3D Xpoint and thus they are very useful for such SSDs that use 3D XPoint and that are used in a "scalable" RAID manner. Read about Intel Optane SSD 900P Review: 3D XPoint Unleashed https://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel-optane-ssd-900p-3d-xpoint,review-34076.html And here is my scalable RWLocks that i have invented, i have also invented Starvation-free scalable RWLocks, please look at my scalable RWLocks that i have invented inside my C++ synchronization objects library for Windows and Linux here, because it is really powerful: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library You will find the Delphi and FreePascal versions of my scalable RWLocks and there source code here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ As you have noticed i am an "inventor" of many "scalable" algorithms and there implementations, i have also invented a fully scalable Threadpool that is really powerful and i have invented scalable FIFO queues that are node-based and array-based and i have invented a scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references. So Stay tunned ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 08:29AM -0800 Hello... Read again, more precision again: I have just looked at the following Scalable hash map: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lock-free/qCYGGkrwbcA As you can read that its cost of read transaction (find operation) is about 30 cycles, this is what makes it interesting. But you have to know that i have "invented" the following scalable algorithms and there implementations, read about them: "LW_Asym_RWLockX that is a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does spin-wait, and my Asym_RWLockX, a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does not spin-wait, but waits on my SemaMonitor, so it is energy efficient." You can download them from my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library And as you have noticed since my scalable algorithms above are costless in the reader side , so i will use them in my following scalable parallel hashtable to make it scalable and costless in the reader side of my scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-hashlist And i will use them inside my following scalable Parallel Varfiler to make it scalable and costless in the reader side of my scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler And I just "enhanced" my Scalable Parallel Varfiler benchmarks, please run the following multicore benchmark for my scalable Parallel Varfiler called "test3.exe" that you will find inside the zip file , you can download the zip file from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-varfiler-benchmarks And you can download my Scalable Parallel Varfiler from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 08:00AM -0800 Hello... More "precision" with a correction of a last typo: I have just looked at the following Scalable hash map: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lock-free/qCYGGkrwbcA As you can read that its cost of read transaction (find operation) is about 30 cycles, this is what makes it interesting. But you have to know that i have "invented" the following scalable algorithms and there implementations, read about them: "LW_Asym_RWLockX that is a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does spin-wait, and my Asym_RWLockX, a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does not spin-wait, but waits on my SemaMonitor, so it is energy efficient." You can download them from my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library And as you have noticed since my scalable algorithms above are costless in the reader side , so i will use them in my following scalable parallel hashtable to make it scalable and costless in the reader side: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-hashlist And i will use them inside my following scalable Parallel Varfiler to make it scalable and costless in the reader side: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler And I just "enhanced" my Scalable Parallel Varfiler benchmarks, please run the following multicore benchmark for my scalable Parallel Varfiler called "test3.exe" that you will find inside the zip file , you can download the zip file from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-varfiler-benchmarks And you can download my Scalable Parallel Varfiler from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 07:42AM -0800 Hello... I have just looked at the following Scalable hash map: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lock-free/qCYGGkrwbcA As you can read that its cost of read transaction (find operation) is about 30 cycles, this is what makes it interesting. But you have to know that i have "invented" the following scalable algorithms and there implementations, read about them: "LW_Asym_RWLockX that is a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does spin-wait, and my Asym_RWLockX, a lightweight scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex that uses a technic that looks like Seqlock without looping on the reader side like Seqlock, and this has permited the reader side to be costless, it is FIFO fair on the writer side and FIFO fair on the reader side and it is of course Starvation-free and it does not spin-wait, but waits on my SemaMonitor, so it is energy efficient." You can download them from my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library And as you have noticed since my scalable algoritms above are costless in the reader side , so i will use them in my following scalable parallel hashtable: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-hashlist And i will use them inside my scalable Parallel Varfiler here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler And I just "enhanced" my Scalable Parallel Varfiler benchmarks, please run the following multicore benchmark for my scalable Parallel Varfiler called "test3.exe" that you will find inside the zip file , you can download the zip file from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-varfiler-benchmarks And you can download my Scalable Parallel Varfiler from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-varfiler Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 04:43AM -0800 Hello, I want to share with you this beautiful Disco song: Carl Douglas ~ Kung Fu Fighting 1974 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g75QS0nNldA&list=RDg75QS0nNldA&start_radio=1 Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 04:40AM -0800 Hello.. About my C++ synchronization objects library for Windows and Linux.. Here is what i have enhanced: - My Scalable Asymmetric Reader-Writer Mutex was enhanced, now you can pass the number of reader threads to the constructor. - And my SemaMonitor was enhanced, the wait() method returns true if it is signaled and false if it is not. - And also i have added a Mutex that works correctly. Please read more about my C++ synchronization objects library on my following website: You can download my C++ synchronization objects library that i have just updated from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/c-synchronization-objects-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 02 04:39AM -0800 Hello.. About a very important point about morality.. As you are noticing morality is not an "exact" science , but it has to use rationality and use measure and use science so that to maximize correctly "perfection" that is the "goal" of morality, so this is why i am talking about the way of how to maximize correctly perfection by showing why this or that "diversity" is necessary and this or that "quantity" is necessary or this or that "quality" is necessary, this is why you are noticing that i am for example speaking about "smartness" in terms of or taking into account "quantity" and "diversity" and "quality" so that you are able to set more correctly morality. Please reread all my thoughts carefully to notice it: I think that i am more positive about morality.. Because i am able to do much better political philosophy, so i am able to feel more what is morality and what is today morality, I think that morality of today democracies is a beautiful thing, and you have to understand my way of doing to be able to make morality successful, you have to think more efficiently by asking for example the following questions: - How to be "security" locally and globally , because security is important. - How to be the right "diversity" that gives the right perfection - And how to be the right "quantity" that gives the right perfection. - And how to be the right perfection. Those are the important questions to ask , and you have to be more efficient to answer them, because that's the most important parts of morality, so this is why i am looking carefully at how must we be this "diversity" that gives the right perfection, and this "quantity" that gives the right perfection etc. and you will notice that i am "prioritizing" like this to be more successful in my political philosophy, please read all my following thoughts to notice it: About neo-nazis and white supremacists.. As you have noticed i am a white arab that is more sophisticated like a thinker, so i am seeing neo-nazis or white supremacists as being inferior thinking, why ? because they have the tendency to be too violent and they have the tendency to see morality as if it has to be like a pure morality, i mean that they are too much "purism" of morality, so they want to purify the society from "imperfections" too much ! so they are not understanding the requirements of today morality ! because the very basis of today morality is that it has to know how to be the right "diversity" and the right "imperfections" and the right "quantity" that bring the right perfection that is needed by morality ! but neo-nazis are not understanding the game of today morality because they lack sophistication of political philosophy, so neo-nazis and white supremacists wants "naively" to "purify" too much from imperfections, because they are like purists of morality ! but there act is not in accordance with science and with political philosophy. So i think that they have to "reform" there political ideologies, and they have to read my following thoughts to understand better: About political philosophy.. As you are noticing i am a white arab that is more sophisticated type of person, that is a more serious computer programmer and a more rational type of person and a gentleman type of person, this is why i don't believe in God, because God is not love and that's the important thing to know. Other than that you have seen me writing in front of you many poems of love, and you have seen me posting about my software projects and you have seen me speaking to you about my political philosophy, but we have to be aware of the requirements, for example when we say "righteousness" , what is it to be righteousness ? that's the most important part of morality ! and to be more capable of morality you have to know how to be the right diversity and the right perfection and you have to be able to see what is bringing democracy to morality, that's why i have posted more about my political philosophy, here is again some of my thoughts and my architectural ideas of my political philosophy, read them again to be able to understand my thoughts: Now i have come to an interesting subject about philosophy.. I think you know me more now.. Now you have also to understand my way of doing, i am trying to find a way that permits me to "model" more efficiently "humanity", this is why you are seeing me answering some questions such as: From where comes a scientific mind ? and from where comes order ? Now you have to understand my way, let's for example look at me, as you have noticed i am a more "rational" type of person that is more technical and that is mathematics and i am also a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person, now let us return to the basis of being more "rational" type of person, as you are noticing since i am more rational type of person, this more rational, in me, permits me to be more "precise" and more "measure" and more "logic" and more "rational", and this causes that it makes me see less rational type of persons as "inferior" thinking, so this more rational in me permits me to be higher level of quality of thinking, and i am not a narcissist, but a narcissist has the same effect as he want to be superior thinking, but a narcissist has an abnormal behavior that leads him to problems in society, look for example at Donald Trump, he is a narcissist type of person, but he is having problems with his behavior that we can judge as abnormal behavior that causes problems, so as you have noticed i am not a narcissist, because i am a gentleman type of person, but the very basis is that i am being a higher level of quality of thinking because i am a more rational type of person, so this permits us to model more correctly humanity, this is why you have seen me writing the following: About quality and about security.. I am more "smart", and you have to understand my work, being more rational is not sufficient, you have to know how to play it "safer", and i am also showing you how to be able to "model" our humanity, and i am showing you how to be "quality" and how to be "security", first here is what i said about being more rational: I have come to an interesting subject.. So i was asking myself the following question: From where comes a scientific mind ? I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this question: When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture, because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to "recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person. Second, but being more rational that brings quality is not sufficient, you have also to be security, and here is what i said about security: How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ? This is an interesting subject of political philosophy.. Because even a violent ideology like nazism bases its ideology on "order" first ! So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order ! You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied ! So from wich causes we get more order ? I think that order comes from the fact that we are security for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we are security for oneself and others ? we are security for oneself and others for different causes, here they are: 1- We are good morality that takes care of security. 2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security 3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system as a critical system that needs the right requirements for the right security both locally and globally. 4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself or others. And this is related to my following thoughts: You have to understand Buddha I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security is also like love and compassion. This is why i said before: If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ? I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this.. Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs "security", so you have to be more capable, so more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality and more perfection. But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more "hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step, psychology wants also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and "discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this is like the main point of Buddha. The main point of Buddha is the Path of "Serenity" and "Insight", from this "Insight" you get more knowledge of yourself by more "hindsight" and more "introspection" that permits you to guide your more savage instincts in the right direction. There is a smart question inherent to my previous question of: How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ? and it is: Do we need to fear capitalism of today or fear "more" free market internationally of today because it is not "order" ? I think we have to understand the "spirit" of capitalism of today to understand more what is happening, i think capitalism of today is more "soften", and it ressembles a "sportive" competition, but it can not be called a violent fight, because the actual capitalism lives in a more appropriate "context" that constrain it to be more respect ! because capitalism has to not ignore "Fordism", and has to not ignore consumer confidence index that it must higher globally and locally and this causes more respect, and high economic growth of many countries like african countries and arab countries is more attractive for economic investment etc. etc. and i think that this more interconnected economies bring more peace and more stability and Fordism has noticed it. Philosophy about philosophy.. You will notice that i am more smart, because you have to understand my way of doing political philosophy, so i will ask the following question that will permit us ti understand more my way of doing political philosophy: Why are we doing political philosophy? This type of question gives rise to something similar to human Metathought, it is philosophy about philosophy, but how can we address this problem of why are we doing political philosophy, i think that by reading my political philosophy you will notice that i am more smart because political philosophy is part of morality that is perfection at best as i have proved it(read about it below), and you will notice that this abstraction of my definition of morality is also correct, but you have to define more the "at best" of perfection at best that is morality, and now you will notice that it is the basis of political philosophy, it is also about how to make "safer" morality, it is also about "security", and this permits us to know more about political philosophy, because as you will notice that "democracy" and what we call the separation of powers in the USA system and other systems all are today part of morality, this is a very important part of morality ! and this democracy and separation of powers forces us more to be more moderation to avoid extremism that hurts the system and this is also one of the most important parts of morality that permits morality to be more safer today, this is why i will invite you to read all my following thoughts to understand more my political philosophy: Philosophy about science... I have come to an interesting subject.. So i was asking myself the following question: From where comes a scientific mind ? I have been able to extract the architectural idea that answer this question: When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture, because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to "recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person. And please read my following thoughts, i have corrected a last typo in them: About nihilism and such ideologies.. I am a white arab, and i am a more "wise" type of person, and i am a gentleman kind of person, so i am more capable at thinking political philosophy, and now i am coming to a very interesting subject.. As you are noticing today that people can become more violent when they don't understand what is morality and when they don't understand political philosophy, i will give you more of my wisdom to understand me more: What do you think is also morality ? I have proved that morality is perfection at best, i think that this definition is also correct because it shows that morality has also to be perfectioning and to be correct efficiency so that to be able to be successful ! but you have to be able to see more correctly morality ! morality is not absolute perfection yet ! because morality of today is constructing perfection by also needing "imperfections" to be able to be the right perfection ! this is how you have to be mature in political philosophy ! because if you say that imperfections that are needed by morality so |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment