Saturday, January 19, 2019

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 20 updates in 11 topics

Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:34PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:34PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:33PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 08:34PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 09:57PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 17 10:46PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 18 08:30PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 18 08:34PM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 19 09:10AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 19 09:10AM

Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 18 02:36PM -0800

Hello,
 
 
This was my last post about politics and poetry
 
From now on i will post about parallel programming .
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 18 02:04PM -0800

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
I have to explain something about my below poem:
 
When i am speaking about silence by saying for example:
 
"Because silence after death is also peace and the beautiful Dove
Since silence of death is also Love
But silence after patience is also the path
Since perfection is right."
 
How can we define "silence" ?
 
Since i am not logically saying a "short" silence..
 
In some of my poems i am using the word "silence"
to mean it also symbolically..
 
This is why i said about my poems that uses this meaning of silence the
following:
 
Silence is also like divine and it is also "perfection", i mean by
"silence" that it is complete silence of our thoughts etc. so complete
silence is also not having consciousness, it is like a piece of paper, a
piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not
consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very
very "strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have
difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the
reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex
objects. So that means that we can say Thunder too is complete silence
that is absence of consciousness, because the definition of Thunder
is:
 
"Thunder, sound caused by a lightning discharge. Lightning heats the air
in its path and causes a large over-pressure of the air within its
channel. The channel expands supersonically into the surrounding air as
a shock wave and creates an acoustic signal that is heard as thunder."
 
 
But as you are noticing when i say in my poem the following:
 
"Since thunder is silence"
 
So notice that Thunder is only the physical because we are not
specifying that Thunder is "heared", because we have
to say for example that: "We hear the Thunder", and when
we say it like this that's means that it is Thunder that is physical
that gives a "sound" and also that's also our ears and brain that listen
to the sound. So when you say only the word "Thunder" , Thunder becomes
like a piece of paper above, since it becomes physical that is complete
silence , so i think it is "logical" to say in my poem of love that:
"Since thunder is silence"
 
So this is why i am saying on my poems that:
 
"I love you as the silence."
 
Because silence is "divine", so it is as i am saying that my love is divine.
 
 
Read the rest to understand my poem below:
 
Is what you see is what you get ?
 
It is like doing philosophy, because it is the very basis
of philosophy and science, you have to know how to be more capable to
differentiate between the appearances and realities, between
the false and the truth and you have also to be able to see
more correctly what is beautifulness.. it is like the basis of
philosophy and science,look for example at my new poem below, it says that:
 
"Since life is sweetness of the untold"
 
 
This also like philosophy , because my poem is speaking
about an important thing that we notice today, and
it is also the goal of the arabic proverb that i am explaining below,
it is that we are looking at past history of white people
and saying that white people are not good , but
i don't think that this is correct thinking, because
we have like to be able to be "sweetness of the untold"
and we have also to be able to see beaututifulness more correctly,
it is like doing philosophy, this is why i am more "wise" and
more "mature" to see this "sweetness" and this "beautifulness",
this is why you are noticing that i have posted the arabic
proverb below, to make you understand that we have
to know how to be less complains of past history, because
past history was full of weaknesses and this is why it was
inferiority, so we have to know how to be sweetness of the untold,
i mean that we have to know how to complain less about past history
of white people, and this complaining less is also like sweetness
that you will be able to create , and i think our world needs
it to be less violence and less destructive. Other than that
in my new poem below i am also speaking about an important
thing that is nihilistic kind of philosophies by saying this:
 
I said in my following new poem the following:
 
"Because silence after death is also peace and the beautiful Dove
Since silence of death is also Love
But silence after patience is also the path
Because perfection is right."
 
 
Because that's inferred from what i have explained in my thoughts of
my political philosophy that i have posted previously, where i said that
patience of "silence after patience is also the path" of my poem
is also "patience" of "effort" necessary by "perfection" that we have
to be to attain more "advanced" perfection that permits us to be
happiness or absolute happiness, and i think we will attain it more
quickly because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating
returns, so we have to be this patience. This is why i wrote the
following in my political philosophy (and read my new poem below):
 
We have to be more precision and more smartness in political philosophy..
 
As you have noticed i said the following:
 
"Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanistic or more tolerance, but it is acceptable."
 
So to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?
 
A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.
 
But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read my thoughts of political philosophy about what i
am saying about Capitalism and egoism and you will notice that we have
not to be pessimistic. But there is still an important thing to talk
about , and that is the fact that we have to "analyze" and "evaluate"
correctly the "realities" of our democracies more correctly , and we
have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read my thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand better.
 
Also as you have noticed i said previously that:
 
There is an arab proverb that says in arabic:
 
"Laa taqoulou kaana abii, bal qoul haana da'"
 
And I translate it in english:
 
"Don't say my father was, but say that here i am"
 
This is also my philosophy, the meaning also of this arabic proverb is
that we have to be less complains about past history that was also
"full" of weaknesses, and we have today to construct a much more
enhanced system than past history systems. This is my philosophy in
life, this is why i must be more "professionalism" that knows more how
to think more efficiently, and this is why i am a more serious computer
programmer, and this is why i am thinking and writing political
philosophy and this is why i am thinking and writing my poems in front
of you, this is how i am constructing the one that i call "myself", it
is like the arab proverb above, because like in the proverb above, i am
saying "here i am" by showing that i am more capable.
 
 
And here is my new poem:
 
 
Coming in from the old
 
Where we were bought and sold like slaves
 
Since life is not only what we are told
 
Since life is saying wait and behold
 
Since life is sweetness of the untold
 
Since life is making it new and old
 
Since life is also coming from above
 
So one word
 
So two words
 
So three words
 
So many words
 
To avoid the hate
 
To avoid the sword
 
Because it is also one world
 
Because it is as if it is from Lord
 
Because it is wisdom from the new and the old
 
Because it is like the light of angels from above
 
Because silence after death is also peace and the beautiful Dove
 
Since silence of death is also Love
 
But silence after patience is also the path
 
Since perfection is right.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 18 12:34PM -0800

Hello,,
 
Read this:
 
 
Let us be more smart..
 
 
I have to be more "smart", as you have noticed i have just written the
following (and it is also like a logical proof by contradiction):
 
===
 
walt hampton the neo-nazi on soc.culture.israel posted this:
 
 
https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/01/true-morality-is-from-nature-and-natures-god/
 
 
It says this:
 
"Males must be males according to their true nature and females must be
females according to their nature."
 
This is "stupidity", because there is a set that we call the set of
"males" and there is a set that we call a set of "females", first, the
set of males contains many sub-sets, a part of them are
more violent males that we have to "control" with morality
that is about perfectioning. And the goal of morality is perfectioning
or more precisely i have defined it as perfection at best , and i have
defined more what is the at best of perfection at best, morality is not
about only nature.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
===
 
 
 
Now i have to be more "precise", as you have noticed i have spoken about
morality in my thoughts of my political philosophy, but as you are
noticing my answer above is like a "quick" logical proof by
contradiction, but i can go and explain more that the goal of morality
is about perfectioning towards the absolute perfection, and as you
have noticed in my thoughts of my political philosophy i have
defined (and proved) that morality is perfection at best, and i have
also defined more what is the at best of perfection at best,
but to answer more precisely the above post of this neo-nazi,
we have to say that to be "capable" of constructing more correctly
morality you have to be capable also of knowing how to "model" more
correctly our humanity, for example we can ask a question of
who is capable of governing ? and we can also ask: is empathy an
important characteristic of humans ? i am asking those question because
as you will notice that empathy is a characteristic that can permit to
help others and it can permit also to be more efficient as a group by
helping and learning others more efficiently, so it can be a
characteristic that is really important, so this is why you have seen me
asking some questions such as:
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
and from where comes order ?
 
Read my following thoughts to understand more:
 
Now i have come to an interesting subject about philosophy..
 
I think you know me more now..
 
Now you have also to understand my way of doing, i am
trying to find a way that permits me to "model" more efficiently
"humanity", this is why you are seeing me answering some
questions such as: From where comes a scientific mind ?
and from where comes order ?
 
Now you have to understand my way, let's for example look at me,
as you have noticed i am a more "rational" type of person that
is more technical and that is mathematics and i am
also a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person,
now let us return to the basis of being more "rational" type of person,
as you are noticing since i am more rational type of person,
this more rational, in me, permits me to be more "precise" and more
"measure" and more "logic" and more "rational", and this causes that it
makes me see less rational type of persons as "inferior" thinking, so
this more rational in me permits me to be higher level of quality of
thinking, and i am not a narcissist, but a narcissist has the same
effect as he want to be superior thinking, but a narcissist has an
abnormal behavior that leads him to problems in society, look
for example at Donald Trump, he is a narcissist type of person,
but he is having problems with his behavior that we can
judge as abnormal behavior that causes problems, so
as you have noticed i am not a narcissist, because i am
a gentleman type of person, but the very basis is that
i am being a higher level of quality of thinking because
i am a more rational type of person, so this permits
us to model more correctly humanity, this is why
you have seen me writing the following:
 
About quality and about security..
 
I am more "smart", and you have to understand my work,
being more rational is not sufficient, you have
to know how to play it "safer", and i am also showing you how to be able
to "model" our humanity, and i am showing you how to be "quality" and
how to be "security", first here is what i said about being more rational:
 
I have come to an interesting subject..
 
So i was asking myself the following question:
 
From where comes a scientific mind ?
 
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
 
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.
 
Second, but being more rational that brings quality is not sufficient,
you have also to be security, and here is what i said about security:
 
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
 
This is an interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Because even a violent ideology like nazism bases its ideology
on "order" first !
 
So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order !
 
You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied !
 
So from wich causes we get more order ?
 
I think that order comes from the fact that we are security
for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we
are security for oneself and others ? we are security
for oneself and others for different causes, here they
are:
 
1- We are good morality that takes
care of security.
 
2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security
 
3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system
as a critical system that needs the right requirements
for the right security both locally and globally.
 
4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself
or others.
 
 
And this is related to my following thoughts:
 
You have to understand Buddha
 
I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us
to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us
to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline
his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that
are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be
more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security
is also like love and compassion.
 
This is why i said before:
 
If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ?
 
I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this..
 
Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of
more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others
and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but
if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for
oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like
emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more
disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs
"security", so you have to be more capable, so
more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for
security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality
and more perfection.
 
But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of
today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit
us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more
"hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step,
psychology wants
also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and
"discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of
empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding
our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this
is like the main point of Buddha.
 
The main point of Buddha is the Path of "Serenity" and "Insight",
from this "Insight" you get more knowledge of yourself by more
"hindsight" and more "introspection" that permits you to guide your more
savage instincts in the right direction.
 
There is a smart question inherent to my previous question of:
 
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
 
and it is:
 
Do we need to fear capitalism of today or fear "more" free market
internationally of today because it is not "order" ?
 
I think we have to understand the "spirit" of capitalism of today
to understand more what is happening, i think capitalism of today
is more "soften", and it ressembles a "sportive" competition,
but it can not be called a violent fight, because the actual capitalism
lives in a more appropriate "context" that constrain it to be more
respect ! because capitalism has to not ignore "Fordism", and has to not
ignore consumer confidence index that it must higher globally and
locally and this causes more respect, and high economic growth of many
countries like african countries and arab countries is more
attractive for economic investment etc. etc. and i think that this more
interconnected economies bring more peace and more stability and Fordism
has noticed it.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 18 11:23AM -0800

Hello...
 
 
walt hampton the neo-nazi on soc.culture.israel posted this:
 
 
https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/01/true-morality-is-from-nature-and-natures-god/
 
 
It says this:
 
"Males must be males according to their true nature and females must be
females according to their nature."
 
This is "stupidity", because there is a set that we call the set of
"males" and there is a set that we call a set of "females", first, the
set of males contains many sub-sets, a part of them are
more violent males that we have to "control" with morality
that is about perfectionning. And the goal of morality is perfectionning
or more precisely i have defined it as perfection at best , and i have
defined more what is the at best of perfection at best, morality is not
about only nature.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 18 09:35AM -0800

Hello...
 
Read the following webpages to understand better my
following thoughts, notice that it says:
 
"If Kurzweil and others who agree with him are correct, then we may be
as blown away by 2030 as our 1750 guy was by 2015—i.e. the next DPU
might only take a couple decades—and the world in 2050 might be so
vastly different than today's world that we would barely recognize it."
 
Read here:
 
The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence
 
https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html
 
 
Neo-nazism and the like are a failure.
 
I think those kind of ideologies are a failure because they
are not adapting themselves to what will be our "near" future,
this is why they are like idiots ! i am a more serious computer
programmer who has invented many scalable algorithms
and there implementations, and i am more educated to know
more about the exponential progress of technology etc.
and about the law of accelerating returns. Many
are thinking that our near future will be like our today,
but this is a big mistake ! because in about 20 years from now we will
be "so" powerful and we will be so different from today,
because the exponential progress of technology etc, and the law of
accelerating returns will make us soon so powerful, this is
what you have to understand to be more capable at political philosophy,
and this is what i am trying to explain to those neo-nazis and the like
that are so violent.
 
Read the rest of my previous thoughts:
 
 
About neo-nazism and white supremacism..
 
I have done more political philosophy, and i have just come across this
post of those white neo-nazis and white supremacists, and read what is
saying Carolina Reb the neo-nazi:
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.israel/IKb1IhRCiBo
 
 
As you have noticed they are hating and wanting to violent and wanting
to kill others and wanting to reduce violently the population of the
earth etc. so as you are noticing they are being violence, but notice
that this violence lacks the "basics" of what must be a political
philosophy , because the first requirement of a political philosophy is
that we have to be an "effort" of perfection or perfectionning, this is
also what must be morality today , and we have to be more optimistic
because of the exponential progress of technology etc and because of the
law of accelerating returns that will make us soon so powerful (in about
20 years from now), and this will permit us to transcend many of our
problems,
so as you are noticing we are making exponential progress even in
genetics, read what i have posted a few days ago about it:
 
==
You have to be aware that our Exponential progress and our law of
accelerating returns will make us "soon" really powerful, so we have to
know how to be patience and not be destructive..
 
Also, researchers are finding more and more genetic variants associated
with intelligence all the time, as sample sizes in these studies
continue to increase. And we are used in more general terms to the
application of machine learning in dredging these kinds of
high-dimensional data for meaningful patterns that give almost godlike
powers of classification and prediction in other areas. It seems
reasonable to assume that the power of genetic information will continue
to increase, even for complex traits like intelligence, which involves
variations in thousands of genes.
 
Read more here:
 
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/is-our-future-really-written-in-our-genes/
==
 
 
And i think we have also to be more optimistic because of the following:
 
AI Will Create Millions More Jobs Than It Will Destroy. Here's How
 
Read more here:
 
https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/#sm.0000jl57td15saeevxu0p87884x2f
 
 
And about the "effort" of perfection that we must be, read what i said
in my poem about silence after "patience":
 
 
Is what you see is what you get ?
 
It is like doing philosophy, because it is the very basis
of philosophy and science, you have to know how to be more capable to
differentiate between the appearances and realities, between
the false and the truth and you have also to be able to see
more correctly what is beautifulness.. it is like the basis of
philosophy and science,look for example at my new poem below, it says that:
 
"Since life is sweetness of the untold"
 
 
This also like philosophy , because my poem is speaking
about an important thing that we notice today, and
it is also the goal of the arabic proverb that i am explaining below,
it is that we are looking at past history of white people
and saying that white people are not good , but
i don't think that this is correct thinking, because
we have like to be able to be "sweetness of the untold"
and we have also to be able to see beaututifulness more correctly,
it is like doing philosophy, this is why i am more "wise" and
more "mature" to see this "sweetness" and this "beautifulness",
this is why you are noticing that i have posted the arabic
proverb below, to make you understand that we have
to know how to be less complains of past history, because
past history was full of weaknesses and this is why it was
inferiority, so we have to know how to be sweetness of the untold,
i mean that we have to know how to complain less about past history
of white people, and this complaining less is also like sweetness
that you will be able to create , and i think our world needs
it to be less violence and less destructive. Other than that
in my new poem below i am also speaking about an important
thing that is nihilistic kind of philosophies by saying this:
 
I said in my following new poem the following:
 
"Because silence after death is also peace and the beautiful Dove
Since silence of death is also Love
But silence after patience is also the path
Because perfection is right."
 
 
Because that's inferred from what i have explained in my thoughts of
my political philosophy that i have posted previously, where i said that
patience of "silence after patience is also the path" of my poem
is also "patience" of "effort" necessary by "perfection" that we have
to be to attain more "advanced" perfection that permits us to be
happiness or absolute happiness, and i think we will attain it more
quickly because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating
returns, so we have to be this patience. This is why i wrote the
following in my political philosophy (and read my new poem below):
 
We have to be more precision and more smartness in political philosophy..
 
As you have noticed i said the following:
 
"Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanistic or more tolerance, but it is acceptable."
 
So to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?
 
A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.
 
But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read my thoughts of political philosophy about what i
am saying about Capitalism and egoism and you will notice that we have
not to be pessimistic. But there is still an important thing to talk
about , and that is the fact that we have to "analyze" and "evaluate"
correctly the "realities" of our democracies more correctly , and we
have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read my thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand better.
 
Also as you have noticed i said previously that:
 
There is an arab proverb that says in arabic:
 
"Laa taqoulou kaana abii, bal qoul haana da'"
 
And I translate it in english:
 
"Don't say my father was, but say that here i am"
 
This is also my philosophy, the meaning also of this arabic proverb is
that we have to be less complains about past history that was also
"full" of weaknesses, and we have today to construct a much more
enhanced system than past history systems. This is my philosophy in
life, this is why i must be more "professionalism" that knows more how
to think more efficiently, and this is why i am a more serious computer
programmer, and this is why i am thinking and writing political
philosophy and this is why i am thinking and writing my poems in front
of you, this is how i am constructing the one that i call "myself", it
is like the arab proverb above, because like in the proverb above, i am
saying "here i am" by showing that i am more capable.
 
 
And here is my new poem:
 
 
Coming in from the old
 
Where we were bought and sold like slaves
 
Since life is not only what we are told
 
Since life is saying wait and behold
 
Since life is sweetness of the untold
 
Since life is making it new and old
 
Since life is also coming from above
 
So one word
 
So two words
 
So three words
 
So many words
 
To avoid the hate
 
To avoid the sword
 
Because it is also one world
 
Because it is as if it is from Lord
 
Because it is wisdom from the new and the old
 
Because it is like the light of angels from above
 
Because silence after death is also peace and the beautiful Dove
 
Since silence of death is also Love
 
But silence after patience is also the path
 
Since perfection is right.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 17 03:20PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
My efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales very well was
updated to version 3.62
 
Now the priority parameter of the Execute() method is working correctly.
 
And now i think that my Threadpool with priorities is working correctly
and it scales very well and it is powerful and fast.
 
You can download it from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
 
 
And about Active Object Pattern..
 
Read about it here:
 
https://madhuraoakblog.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/active-object-pattern/
 
 
As you have noticed i have "invented" a really powerful Threadpool with
priorities that scales very well, and it implements ParallelFor() with
priorities that too scales very well, also you can "easily" emulate an
Active Object Pattern with it, so no need to implement the Active Object
Pattern.
 
More precision about my efficient Threadpool that scales very well, my
Threadpool is much more scalable than the one of Microsoft, in the
workers side i am using scalable counting networks to distribute on the
many queues or stacks, so it is scalable on the workers side, on the
consumers side i am also using lock striping to be able to scale very
well, so it is scalable on those parts, on the other part that is work
stealing, i am using scalable counting networks, so globally it scales
very well, and since work stealing is "rare" so i think that my
efficient Threadpool that scales very well is really powerful, and it is
much more optimized and the scalable counting networks eliminate false
sharing, and it works with Windows and Linux.
 
You can download it from my website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
 
The Execute() method now supports passing a method or passing a procedure.
 
I have also implemented a ParallelFor() that scales well, here is the
method:
 
procedure ParallelFor(nMin, nMax:integer;aProc:
TParallelProc;Ptr:pointer=nil;pmode:TParallelMode=pmBlocking;Priority:TPriorities=NORMAL_PRIORITY);
 
You can pass a parameter in Ptr as a allocated memory, and you can set
pmode parameter to pmBlocking so that ParallelFor() is blocking or to
pmNonBlocking so that ParallelFor() is non-blocking, and Priority
parameter is the priority. Look inside the test.pas example to see how
to use it.
 
Also i have implemented a portable and efficient Future:
 
My portable and efficient implementation of a future in Delphi and
FreePascal was updated to version 1.05
 
I have just enhanced it, and now it is working correctly and efficiently.
 
You can download it from my website:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-and-efficient-implementation-of-a-future-in-delphi-and-freepascal
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 17 02:26PM -0800

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
 
Software Developer Repeats as 'Best Job' for 2019
 
Read more here:
 
https://adtmag.com/articles/2019/01/10/best-job.aspx
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 17 01:34PM -0800

Hello,
 
Read this:
 
 
About Active Object Pattern..
 
Read about it here:
 
https://madhuraoakblog.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/active-object-pattern/
 
 
As you have noticed i have "invented" a really powerful Threadpool with
priorities that scales very well, and it implements ParallelFor() with
priorities that too scales very well, also you can "easily" emulate an
Active Object Pattern with it, so no need to implement the Active Object
Pattern.
 
More precision about my efficient Threadpool that scales very well, my
Threadpool is much more scalable than the one of Microsoft, in the
workers side i am using scalable counting networks to distribute on the
many queues or stacks, so it is scalable on the workers side, on the
consumers side i am also using lock striping to be able to scale very
well, so it is scalable on those parts, on the other part that is work
stealing, i am using scalable counting networks, so globally it scales
very well, and since work stealing is "rare" so i think that my
efficient Threadpool that scales very well is really powerful, and it is
much more optimized and the scalable counting networks eliminate false
sharing, and it works with Windows and Linux.
 
You can download it from my website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
 
The Execute() method now supports passing a method or passing a procedure.
 
I have also implemented a ParallelFor() that scales well, here is the
method:
 
procedure ParallelFor(nMin, nMax:integer;aProc:
TParallelProc;Ptr:pointer=nil;pmode:TParallelMode=pmBlocking;Priority:TPriorities=NORMAL_PRIORITY);
 
You can pass a parameter in Ptr as a allocated memory, and you can set
pmode to pmBlocking so that ParallelFor() is blocking or to
pmNonBlocking so that ParallelFor() is non-blocking. Look inside the
test.pas example to see how to use it.
 
Also i have implemented a portable and efficient Future:
 
My portable and efficient implementation of a future in Delphi and
FreePascal was updated to version 1.05
 
I have just enhanced it, and now it is working correctly and efficiently.
 
You can download it from my website:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-and-efficient-implementation-of-a-future-in-delphi-and-freepascal
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 17 11:25AM -0800

Hello..
 
 
I correct a last typo, read again..
 
More about communism and socialism..
 
I think that big debt and rising deficit of the government can be solved
more efficiently by reducing the "size" of the government and by making
the government more efficient and more efficient at "spending".
I think this is another problem of communism and communism of China,
because communism needs a "big" and less "efficient" government,
and this can cause problems, and we are noticing that communism of China
today is getting into a big problem of debt resulting from
inefficiencies of the communist government.
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems
 
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/09/economy/china-economy-risks/index.html
 
But look at why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation
in Europe , look especially at the its optimization of the Government
size(that includes more efficiency of government spending):
 
The important characteristics of Switzerland are:
 
1. Rule of law
 
2. Optimization of the Government size
 
3. Regulatory efficiency
 
4. Open markets
 
 
Read more here:
 
https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand my views:
 
We have to be more smart about communism of China..
 
As you have noticed i said that democracy is more efficient in fighting
corruption, so i will give you an example, i said the following:
 
 
==
I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is
the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those
investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad
investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this
China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China,
here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video:
 
Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION?
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY
==
 
 
So here we are again at what we call "corruption", since how
can you be "confidence" with communism ? i mean that communism
of China says that it has also to "help" other third world countries and
such because it is communism that wants much more "equality", and this
can bring problems and inefficiencies, because communism can help others
by economically investing in other third world countries even if the
economic investments is inefficient because communism want to be much
more equality, and i think that this is what happened to communism
of China(look at the video above to notice it), and this can
be called corruption.
 
 
Read all the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
 
About socialism..
 
I think that there is a real "impact" of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
Now about communism..
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
I will try to answer this question:
 
First you have to read my thoughts of my political philosophy
below to understand more my thoughts and to understand that
an acceptable abstraction is also that i am defining
morality as perfection at best and i am defining more the "at best"
of perfection at best , please read my thoughts
of my political philosophy below to understand better.
 
Now comes the very important question:
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
Is for example communism of China acceptable ?
 
So since as i have defined morality below that it is
perfection at best, so you have to notice that communism of China
has to "survive" to be able to be acceptable, so i think
the main advantage of communism of China is the capacity of China
that is its big population and also its quality
of smartness and its level of perfection, and i think that this is the
main advantage that makes communism of China be able to survive,
now since communism of China is more "apt" to survive, so the next
smart question is what is the nest very important thing
to notice about communism of China ? i think
communism of China is judging that its people has
to be more "controlled" by morality so that
to make successful morality, and since as i have
defined it , morality is perfection at best,
so we understand that morality is about perfectionning
and about perfection, this is the goal of morality, it is
to "perfect" and to perfect people, and this is why i think that even
though that the act of communism of China that is to control more
the people than the West to make them more perfect can be viewed as
extremism by the West, i think that morality
that is perfection at best can consider and define this act of communism
of China of controlling more the people to make them more "perfect"
as an act that is more "acceptable" by morality that is perfection at
best,but i think communism of China has a weakness that it is not as
efficient
as democracies of the West at fighting "corruption".
 
And I think that debt rising deficit resulting can be solved more
efficiently by reducing the "size" of the government and by
making the government more efficient and more efficient at "spending".
I think this is another problem of communism and communism of China,
because communism needs a "big" and less "efficient" government,
and can cause problems, and we are noticing that communism of China
today is getting into a big problem of debt resulting from
inefficiencies of the communist government.
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems
 
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/09/economy/china-economy-risks/index.html
 
And i think there is another problem of socialism and socialism of
China, and that is the following:
 
I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
 
So now comes the next question:
 
Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanistic or more tolerance, but it is acceptable.
 
And to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?
 
A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.
 
But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read below what i am saying about Capitalism and
egoism and you will notice that we have not to be pessimistic. But there
is still an important thing to talk about , and that is the fact that we
have to "analyze" and "evaluate" correctly the "realities" of our
democracies more correctly , and we have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read below my
thoughts of my political philosophy to understand better.
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
better:
 
My political philosophy..
 
As promised, and so that you understand my previous poem,
here is many of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read them all to
understand my thoughts:
 
About my thoughts..
 
As you are noticing in my following thoughts of my political philosophy
that i am also talking economy and talking about economies of some
countries such as Russia and France and Dubai etc. i am choosing
"carefully" those countries to be able to talk about some important
things that we have to know about macroeconomics and that we have to
apply to be more efficient, please reread all my following thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand more:
 
In the Protestant work ethic, the first to justify, theologically and
morally, the idea of work for the job, The ardor at work being defined
as the confirmation of personal salvation. By rendering obsolete the
previous social and theological schemes in which the pursuit of profit
was contrary to the ideals of salvation and charity, the Protestant
ethic favored the great deployment of utilitarian and instrumental
logics. In short, the idea that capitalism is "natural" would be, above
all, a sociohistoric construction.
 
And notice that Utilitarianism is an ethical and philosophical theory
that states that the best action is the one that maximizes utility,
which is usually defined as that which produces the greatest well-being
of the greatest number of people
 
So as you are noticing that the Protestant work ethic was not so
realistic, because i think it was based too much on Utilitarianism, so i
think it was a kind of extremism, so as you are noticing that the
capitalism philosophy does build also a lot over race for profit and
over Utilitarianism too, so this can lead to problems if it gets too
extremistic , that means it gets on too much Utilitarianism and too
much race of profit that can cause problems to society and to humanity,
such as the "envirenmental" problems that we face today, so we have to
be careful and be responsable, but we have not to be pessimistic about
capitalism, because we are more aware today and we are today perfecting
ourselves more efficiently to be more capable of transending this kind
of problems.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts:
 
I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Take for example the capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions
of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of
the means of production, the free market and the competition between
economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three
elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation
of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore,
at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however,
that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element,
being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit.
 
But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in
capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example
capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial
nationalism that is built on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this
egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past
has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be
pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i don't think so because
egoism is constrained by the consumer confidence index that we have
to higher globally and is constrained by the fact that we have
to give the necessary wages to others locally and around the world so
that to be able for others to "buy" our products, like has done it
Fordism, and notice also that today we are economically investing in
many third world countries because of there higher economical growth ,
so this is getting better and better, so we have not to be pessimistic,
and notice that the other criticism I make on the far right political
parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just
bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following:
 
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
 
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
 
For proof, read the following document:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
 
 
And about U.S. multinationals..
 
 
I said yesterday the following:
 
==
 
About our world..
 
I have studied operational research, and you have to understand
a very important thing, you have to understand that science
and technology and economy have to follow some rules
of logistics in operational research, this is the deficiency
Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 17 11:20AM -0800

Hello,,
 
 
Read this:
 
More about communism and socialism..
 
I think that big debt and rising deficit of the government can be solved
more efficiently by reducing the "size" of the governement and by making
the government more efficient and more efficient at "spending".
I think this is another problem of communism and communism of China,
because communism needs a "big" and less "efficient" government,
and this can cause problems, and we are noticing that communism of China
today is getting into a big problem of debt resulting from
inefficiencies of the communist government.
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems
 
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/09/economy/china-economy-risks/index.html
 
But look at why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation
in Europe , look especially at the its optimization of the Government
size(that includes more efficiency of government spending):
 
The important characteristics of Switzerland are:
 
1. Rule of law
 
2. Optimization of the Government size
 
3. Regulatory efficiency
 
4. Open markets
 
 
Read more here:
 
https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand my views:
 
We have to be more smart about communism of China..
 
As you have noticed i said that democracy is more efficient in fighting
corruption, so i will give you an example, i said the following:
 
 
==
I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is
the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those
investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad
investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this
China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China,
here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video:
 
Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION?
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY
==
 
 
So here we are again at what we call "corruption", since how
can you be "confidence" with communism ? i mean that communism
of China says that it has also to "help" other third world countries and
such because it is communism that wants much more "equality", and this
can bring problems and inefficiencies, because communism can help others
by economically investing in other third world countries even if the
economic investments is inefficient because communism want to be much
more equality, and i think that this is what happened to communism
of China(look at the video above to notice it), and this can
be called corruption.
 
 
Read all the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
 
About socialism..
 
I think that there is a real "impact" of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
Now about communism..
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
I will try to answer this question:
 
First you have to read my thoughts of my political philosophy
below to understand more my thoughts and to understand that
an acceptable abstraction is also that i am defining
morality as perfection at best and i am defining more the "at best"
of perfection at best , please read my thoughts
of my political philosophy below to understand better.
 
Now comes the very important question:
 
Is communism acceptable ?
 
Is for example communism of China acceptable ?
 
So since as i have defined morality below that it is
perfection at best, so you have to notice that communism of China
has to "survive" to be able to be acceptable, so i think
the main advantage of communism of China is the capacity of China
that is its big population and also its quality
of smartness and its level of perfection, and i think that this is the
main advantage that makes communism of China be able to survive,
now since communism of China is more "apt" to survive, so the next
smart question is what is the nest very important thing
to notice about communism of China ? i think
communism of China is judging that its people has
to be more "controlled" by morality so that
to make successful morality, and since as i have
defined it , morality is perfection at best,
so we understand that morality is about perfectionning
and about perfection, this is the goal of morality, it is
to "perfect" and to perfect people, and this is why i think that even
though that the act of communism of China that is to control more
the people than the West to make them more perfect can be viewed as
extremism by the West, i think that morality
that is perfection at best can consider and define this act of communism
of China of controlling more the people to make them more "perfect"
as an act that is more "acceptable" by morality that is perfection at
best,but i think communism of China has a weakness that it is not as
efficient
as democracies of the West at fighting "corruption".
 
And I think that debt rising deficit resulting can be solved more
efficiently by reducing the "size" of the government and by
making the government more efficient and more efficient at "spending".
I think this is another problem of communism and communism of China,
because communism needs a "big" and less "efficient" government,
and can cause problems, and we are noticing that communism of China
today is getting into a big problem of debt resulting from
inefficiencies of the communist government.
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems
 
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/09/economy/china-economy-risks/index.html
 
And i think there is another problem of socialism and socialism of
China, and that is the following:
 
I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.
 
Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.
 
This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:
 
It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
 
 
So now comes the next question:
 
Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanistic or more tolerance, but it is acceptable.
 
And to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?
 
A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.
 
But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read below what i am saying about Capitalism and
egoism and you will notice that we have not to be pessimistic. But there
is still an important thing to talk about , and that is the fact that we
have to "analyze" and "evaluate" correctly the "realities" of our
democracies more correctly , and we have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read below my
thoughts of my political philosophy to understand better.
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
better:
 
My political philosophy..
 
As promised, and so that you understand my previous poem,
here is many of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read them all to
understand my thoughts:
 
About my thoughts..
 
As you are noticing in my following thoughts of my political philosophy
that i am also talking economy and talking about economies of some
countries such as Russia and France and Dubai etc. i am choosing
"carefully" those countries to be able to talk about some important
things that we have to know about macroeconomics and that we have to
apply to be more efficient, please reread all my following thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand more:
 
In the Protestant work ethic, the first to justify, theologically and
morally, the idea of work for the job, The ardor at work being defined
as the confirmation of personal salvation. By rendering obsolete the
previous social and theological schemes in which the pursuit of profit
was contrary to the ideals of salvation and charity, the Protestant
ethic favored the great deployment of utilitarian and instrumental
logics. In short, the idea that capitalism is "natural" would be, above
all, a sociohistoric construction.
 
And notice that Utilitarianism is an ethical and philosophical theory
that states that the best action is the one that maximizes utility,
which is usually defined as that which produces the greatest well-being
of the greatest number of people
 
So as you are noticing that the Protestant work ethic was not so
realistic, because i think it was based too much on Utilitarianism, so i
think it was a kind of extremism, so as you are noticing that the
capitalism philosophy does build also a lot over race for profit and
over Utilitarianism too, so this can lead to problems if it gets too
extremistic , that means it gets on too much Utilitarianism and too
much race of profit that can cause problems to society and to humanity,
such as the "envirenmental" problems that we face today, so we have to
be careful and be responsable, but we have not to be pessimistic about
capitalism, because we are more aware today and we are today perfecting
ourselves more efficiently to be more capable of transending this kind
of problems.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts:
 
I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy..
 
Take for example the capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions
of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of
the means of production, the free market and the competition between
economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three
elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation
of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore,
at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however,
that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element,
being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit.
 
But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in
capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example
capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial
nationalism that is built on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this
egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past
has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be
pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i don't think so because
egoism is constrained by the consumer confidence index that we have
to higher globally and is constrained by the fact that we have
to give the necessary wages to others locally and around the world so
that to be able for others to "buy" our products, like has done it
Fordism, and notice also that today we are economically investing in
many third world countries because of there higher economical growth ,
so this is getting better and better, so we have not to be pessimistic,
and notice that the other criticism I make on the far right political
parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just
bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following:
 
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
 
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
 
For proof, read the following document:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
 
 
And about U.S. multinationals..
 
 
I said yesterday the following:
 
==
 
About our world..
 
I have studied operational research, and you have to understand
a very important thing, you have to understand that science
and technology and economy have to follow some rules
of logistics in operational research, this is the deficiency
of neo-nazism and such
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)