- [Modération JNTP] Annulation de <q0lkon$r5o$9@dont-email.me> - 3 Updates
- I will explain more my following poem of love - 1 Update
- More of my thoughts on political philosophy.. - 1 Update
- Here is my other poem of love - 1 Update
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 03 07:31PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 03 07:31PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Jan 03 07:31PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 03 10:37AM -0800 Hello, Read this: I will explain more my following poem of love: You are reading in my following poem of love this: "And beyond the shadows And beyond the moon And beyond the stars And beyond the lightness and darkness We will live forever And we will live over and over" I am speaking of our "humanity" that i think will be able in the future with science and technology and artificial intelligence to transcend death and will be capable to live forever and will be capable to be really so powerful like a God etc. Please reread my poem and you will understand what i mean: I am a white arab and you know me more now.. Here is my other poem of love that i wrote, i will invite you to read it carefully listening at the same time at this beautiful song of Jean-Jacques Goldman - Et l'on n'y peut rien: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvuqS0nxFvA Here is my poem of love: And beyond the shadows And beyond the moon And beyond the stars And beyond the lightness and darkness We will live forever And we will live over and over And beyond the Universe Will our love rest forever ! And with just a flower, and a last wisper of love ! It is like the sound of thunder ! It is like the sound of thunder ! We will keep it like a silence We will keep it like a secret We will keep it like a light We will keep it from inside our hearts Because it is like a fight ! Because it is like time that is running away Because it is like a river that is running away Because it is like suffering that is going away We will walk like the night And we walk like the day And we will surrender like the dark and bright Because we are both life and death Because it is like sadness, love and hope Because the time is walking Because the time is running Because time is disappearing And with just a flower, and a last wisper of love ! It is like the sound of thunder ! It is like the sound of thunder ! We will keep it like a light We will keep it like a silence We will keep it like a secret We will keep it from inside our hearts Because it is like a fight ! Because it's life ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 03 10:29AM -0800 Hello... More of my thoughts on political philosophy.. In the Protestant work ethic, the first to justify, theologically and morally, the idea of work for the job, The ardor at work being defined as the confirmation of personal salvation. By rendering obsolete the previous social and theological schemes in which the pursuit of profit was contrary to the ideals of salvation and charity, the Protestant ethic favored the great deployment of utilitarian and instrumental logics. In short, the idea that capitalism is "natural" would be, above all, a sociohistoric construction. And notice that Utilitarianism is an ethical and philosophical theory that states that the best action is the one that maximizes utility, which is usually defined as that which produces the greatest well-being of the greatest number of people So as you are noticing that the Protestant work ethic was not so realistic, because i think it was based too much on Utilitarianism, so i think it was a kind of extremism, so as you are noticing that the capitalism philosophy does build also a lot over race for profit and over Utilitarianism too, so this can lead to problems if it gets too extremistic , that means it gets on too much Utilitarianism and too much race of profit that can cause problems to society and to humanity, such as the "envirenmental" problems that we face today, so we have to be careful and be responsable, but we have not to be pessimistic about capitalism, because we are more aware today and we are today perfecting ourselves more efficiently to be more capable of transending this kind of problems. Read the rest of my thoughts: I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy.. Take for example the capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of the means of production, the free market and the competition between economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore, at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however, that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element, being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit. But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial nationalism that is built on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i don't think so because egoism is constrained by the consumer confidence index that we have to higher globally and is constrained by the fact that we have to give the necessary wages to others locally and around the world so that to be able for others to "buy" our products, like has done it Fordism, and notice also that today we are economically investing in many third world countries because of there higher economical growth , so this is getting better and better, so we have not to be pessimistic, and notice that the other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following: Offshoring increases demand for more workers "qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of order of about 10%, also according to some recent research the Offshoring of materials and services have both a positive and not negligible effect on productivity. When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 2006). For proof, read the following document: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm And about U.S. multinationals.. I said yesterday the following: == About our world.. I have studied operational research, and you have to understand a very important thing, you have to understand that science and technology and economy have to follow some rules of logistics in operational research, this is the deficiency of neo-nazism and such violent ideologies, they are not understanding the game of today that needs logistics to be more successful, so the world has changed and neo-nazism is not understanding this changing, changes such as you are seeing USA companies coming to Morocco my country such as the following(this is also following rules of logistics): I am a white arab from Morocco, here is US Companies Operating in Morocco: http://heymorocco.com/american-companies-in-morocco.aspx I think DXC Technology was not on the list, here it is: Look at the following video about DXC Technology in Morocco: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ_MyKQ-250 Read about DXC Technology here: http://www.dxc.technology/ So as you are noticing USA is also understanding that we have to know how to work together to be more efficient ! this is why it is working and investing in other countries such as Morocco ! So i think we have to be more optimistic about USA.. === Read the following to understand more about U.S. multinationals: • The worldwide operations of U.S. multinationals are highly concentrated in America in their U.S. parents, not abroad in their foreign affiliates. The idea that U.S. multinationals have somehow "abandoned" the United States is not supported by the facts. They maintain a large presence in America, both relative to the overall U.S. economy and relative to the size of their foreign affiliates. • International engagement drives the overall strength of U.S. multinational companies. Although the United States is still the world's largest single-country market, in the past generation it has been a slow-growth market compared with much of the world. Even with today's worldwide recession, this means that the overall strength of U.S. multinationals is increasingly tied to their success in both America and abroad. It also means that viewing the domestic and foreign operations of U.S. multinationals as unrelated is increasingly incorrect. U.S. multinationals must make strategic investment and employment decisions from a truly global perspective, with links across all locations and with dynamic variation in successful strategies both across companies at a point in time and within companies over time. • Foreign-affiliate activity tends to complement, not substitute for, key parent activities in the United States such as employment, worker compensation, and capital investment. Being globally engaged requires U.S. multinationals to establish operations abroad and also to expand and integrate these foreign activities with their U.S. parents. The idea that global expansion tends to "hollow out" U.S. operations is incorrect. Rather, the scale and scope of U.S. parent activities increasingly depends on successful engagement abroad. Expansion by U.S. parents and their affiliates contributes to the productivity and average standard of living of all Americans. Read more here: https://www.uscib.org/docs/foundation_multinationals.pdf And read all my following thoughts about economy.. About Russia's economy... Read this: Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ? The important characteristics of Switzerland are: 1. Rule of law 2. Optimization of the Government size 3. Regulatory efficiency 4. Open markets Read more here: https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/ So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong economy, read the following to notice it: "Russia's transition from a centrally planned economy to a more market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace. Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term economic development." Read more here: https://www.heritage.org/index/country/russia I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China, here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video: Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY And by analogy, because it is a risk that is dangerous, this risk that is dangerous look like the following risk when i said: == I said: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ == Still about economy and quality.. Why Doesn't DUBAI care about OIL? Dubai has done the following to diversify and make successful its economy and become rich: - Lower taxes - Special economic zones - High degree of immigration freedom - It has attracted more investment Look at this video to know more about DUBAI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEs1uOzt3KM Still about quality As you have noticed growth in France will lower the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption is also a way in economics to lower unemployment more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to build quality products and services like in Germany to be more competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality, because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in being more effective in economy and education France will attract more and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its challenges and I think it is able to meet them. Also I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators: First look at the growth of France here: "Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East - Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to decline, at a very measured pace . " and look also at this about France: According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy. Read more here to notice it: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the budget. Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do: I observed more closely the model of for example the French system, and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the public service in France is much more than that of England, so what can we also do in France to unlock economic growth and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces unemployment. I have to be more precise about USA: I said before on my previous post that: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ So reread my following thoughts: About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics.. I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts: Questions: What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics? Answer: At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Jan 03 10:12AM -0800 Hello, Read this: I am a white arab and you know me more now.. Here is my other poem of love that i wrote, i will invite you to read it carefully listening at the same time at this beautiful song of Jean-Jacques Goldman - Et l'on n'y peut rien: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvuqS0nxFvA Here is my poem of love: And beyond the shadows Beyond the moon And beyond the stars And beyond the lightness and darkness We will live forever And we will live over and over And beyond the Universe Will our love rest forever ! And with just a flower, and a last wisper of love ! It is like the sound of thunder ! It is like the sound of thunder ! We will keep it like a silence We will keep it like a secret We will keep it like a light We will keep it from inside our hearts Because it is like a fight ! Because it is like time that is running away Because it is like a river that is running away Because it is like suffering that is going away We will walk like the night And we walk like the day And we will surrender like the dark and bright Because we are both life and death Because it is like sadness, love and hope Because the time is walking Because the time is running Because time is disappearing And with just a flower, and a last wisper of love ! It is like the sound of thunder ! It is like the sound of thunder ! We will keep it like a light We will keep it like a silence We will keep it like a secret We will keep it from inside our hearts Because it is like a fight ! Because it's life ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment